Manic Declares on PM `post menstrual`

[DeletedUser]

So you admit your point is mute as you can not prove what was sent as an escort.

You can guess but you can not prove beyond reasonable doubt that you are right or they are wrong.

There is ODD from fakes, you dont know how the trains were escorted. Again there is too much you dont know.

So you guess and just hope that if you say they are wrong enough times people will believe you.

Its always good to have actual facts rather then just theory, as theory is easy to rip apart. Good day.

 

[DeletedUser]

So you admit your point is mute as you can not prove what was sent as an escort.

You can guess but you can not prove beyond reasonable doubt that you are right or they are wrong.

There is ODD from fakes, you dont know how the trains were escorted. Again there is too much you dont know.

So you guess and just hope that if you say they are wrong enough times people will believe you.

Its always good to have actual facts rather then just theory, as theory is easy to rip apart. Good day.

first off its a non fake limit world. so who bothers to factor in fakes lol..

your just grasping at straws mate, a full nuke is roughly 75k ODD.

he tried to bring up the point nobles was alot of ODD when infact it wasnt.. so your point is mute and stop reaching for thin air.

and im going based off what they are telling me, reason i never added the escorts up lol..unless they start sending 8 nobles per train then yeah im off.

 

[DeletedUser]

Wanna borrow my crayon when I'm done with it mate ?

 

[DeletedUser]

Im grasping at nothing.

Im just proving you sound off at anything, even when you have no clue what you are talking about. That is all you have done.

The guy sending could have split his nuke in 4 to try and avoid snipe. Hence such a hike in ODD, the fakes may only offer a small amount od ODD, but it is ODD an does count no matter how you try and riggle out of it.

You are a complete bafoon, who is just rambeling and is trying to prove something he can not. You theory here is if you post it enough people will listen. I can say now they will not, with each post you look more and more clueless.

200 ODD per noble. you said he had 19 ish trains. so roughly thats about 74 nobles which is only 15k ODD asfar as the nobles are concerned, he still has 785k ODD uncounted for, so yeah he stacked quite abit lol. rather he shifted troops or not..

so basically he trys to defend every incoming, hawt.

hmmm 19 trains. So that would be 19 nukes.

75k per nuke times 19 nukes = 1.45 million ODD, this is just nukes not nobles.

The guy rose 800k not 1.45 million + nobles + fakes + nukes that went before to clear village.

So please explain to me how he stacked them off, but got way less then half the ODD he should gain :icon_eek:

I call you clueless, i believe that proves it

ps. bold proved totally wrong = you wrong = you just guessing and the forum should just disregard everything you say

 

[DeletedUser]

hmmm 19 trains. So that would be 19 nukes.

75k per nuke times 19 nukes = 1.45 million ODD, this is just nukes not nobles.

The guy rose 800k not 1.45 million + nobles + fakes + nukes that went before to clear village.

So please explain to me how he stacked them off, but got way less then half the ODD he should gain :icon_eek:

I call you clueless, i believe that proves it

ps. bold proved totally wrong = you wrong = you just guessing and the forum should just disregard everything you say

So you admit your point is mute as you can not prove what was sent as an escort.

You can guess but you can not prove beyond reasonable doubt that you are right or they are wrong.

There is ODD from fakes, you dont know how the trains were escorted. Again there is too much you dont know.

So you guess and just hope that if you say they are wrong enough times people will believe you.

Its always good to have actual facts rather then just theory, as theory is easy to rip apart. Good day.

everything i say? you proved one thing possibly wrong and now you say everything i say is wrong. lol i dont follow your logic. we cant always be right and the 75k OD was a estimate of a FULL nuke, as you said mate. we dont even know if they sent FULL nukes. so unless you got the reports, i advise you to take your own advice before you call somebody wrong :icon_wink:

and the whole 75k thing was a rough estimate, not neccassrly saying what they sent.. as you said about the escorts. cant have your cake and eat to.

perhaps you should borrow that guys crayon and go back to your coloring book. :lol:

like i said it was a theory, we have no relation to them, if he just totally sniped everything then he wouldnt have but 70k ODD tops. he stacked over 70-75% of the incomings. thats still alot

 

[DeletedUser]

everything i say? you proved one thing possibly wrong and now you say everything i say is wrong. lol i dont follow your logic. we cant always be right and the 75k OD was a estimate of a FULL nuke, as you said mate. we dont even know if they sent FULL nukes. so unless you got the reports, i advise you to take your own advice before you call somebody wrong :icon_wink:

and the whole 75k thing was a rough estimate, not neccassrly saying what they sent.. as you said about the escorts. cant have your cake and eat to to.

perhaps you should borrow that guys crayon and go back to your coloring book. :lol:

like i said it was a theory, we have no relation to them, if he just totally sniped everything then he wouldnt have but 70k ODD tops. he stacked over 70-75% of the incomings. thats still alot

Ahhh nice, you try and flip. (yawn) your too easy.

I never claimed to be right, i claimed you dont know what your talking about +1 to me as you say above.

The only thing i said anything about being wrong was the bolded part above, which states and i quote "he defends every incoming hawt"

I proved beyond doubt that is not correct. +2 to me.

Your arguement drops to childish insults becuase im proving you wrong, which is the first sign of someone knowing they are wrong but dont want to admit it = +3 to me

I said you have no clue about how the guy split his nuke and nobles. you dont = +4 to me.

I also said the guy could have split his nuke in 4 to escort nobles and with 19 nukes worth 1.45 million and half that being 700k ODD, this would mean the guy could snipe and gain close to 800K with sniping. Showing that it is possible to gain that ODD by sniping = +5 to me.

I really dont care about this subject but the fact you will reply to anything and try and prove it wrong, even when your answers are absolutely clueless means your word is not of facts but mearly for posting purposes only.

When people see the above line it shows they should disregard your word due to the simple fact you talk and talk about things you have no clue about. So how we do know if you are right or even have a clue what your talking. This is why people should disregard your word as mear fiction.

I think you will find that is you totally trashed, now run along and find a new hobby rather then trawling theses forums for someone to talk to

 

[DeletedUser]

Ahhh nice, you try and flip. (yawn) your too easy.

I never claimed to be right, i claimed you dont know what your talking about +1 to me as you say above.

The only thing i said anything about being wrong was the bolded part above, which states and i quote "he defends every incoming hawt"

I proved beyond doubt that is not correct. +2 to me.

Your arguement drops to childish insults becuase im proving you wrong, which is the first sign of someone knowing they are wrong but dont want to admit it = +3 to me

I said you have no clue about how the guy split his nuke and nobles. you dont = +4 to me.

I also said the guy could have split his nuke in 4 to escort nobles and with 19 nukes worth 1.45 million and half that being 700k ODD, this would mean the guy could snipe and gain close to 800K with sniping. Showing that it is possible to gain that ODD by sniping = +5 to me.

I really dont care about this subject but the fact you ill reply to anything and try and prove it wrong, even when your answers are absolutely clueless means your word is not of facts but mearly for posting purposes only.

When people see the above line it shows they should disregard your word due to the simple fact you talk and talk about things you have no clue about. So how we do know if you are right or even have a clue what your talking. This is why people should disregard your word as mear fiction.

I think you will find that is you totally trashed, now run along and find a new hobby rather then trawling theses forums for someone to talk to

lol first off 'it was a theory of mine' i never said i was right, perhaps i should have worded it differently, but it appeared to me, he was defending all the incomings. even then defending 70-75% of the incomings is alot, he shouldve just sniped the trains and waited for support to arrive killing more troops thus taking less damage imo. but hey everybody plays different. who am i to judge.

but basically your going off a bunch of IF's but seeing as no reports are shown, neither of us are right honestly. we both could be right, seeing how im defending agaisnt PACMAN incomings right now, i guess ill even the score abit with the sniping part and will see eh? :icon_rolleyes: maybe ill gain 800k ODD from sniping :lol:

so perhaps you should pull the stick out of your *** and go do something instead of trying to troll theorys :lol: especially when i never claimed to be right. just pointing out my opinon from the outside circle. whoosh whoosh whoosh.

Edit. how can you tell somebody that there opinon is wrong? its my opinon lol...

 

[DeletedUser]

200 ODD per noble. you said he had 19 ish trains. so roughly thats about 74 nobles which is only 15k ODD asfar as the nobles are concerned, he still has 785k ODD uncounted for, so yeah he stacked quite abit lol. rather he shifted troops or not..

so basically he trys to defend every incoming, hawt.

I dont see you say its a theory here?

I see So yeah he stacked quite abit.

To me that is not trying to apply thoery that is you tell someone they are wrong and you are right.

Also you say he trys to defend every incoming

Again if this was a theory of yours id expect a comment such as, it seems/ I guess he defends every incoming <<<< that would be speaking theoretically.

Now stop, look and remember what you posted and understand the difference between telling someone they are worng.

Thus meaning im not trolling theorys, im disproving a very sad little lonely child who needs to reply to every post so he feels like he has someone to talk to.

Also the IFS im working off are yours, what you said to try and prove pacman wrong, so you actually proved yourself wrong and all i had to do was pull your words together to show how biased and dim you really are.

/ends replies as he feels rawr will never learn or understand how patheticaly stupid his rambles are.

 

[DeletedUser]

I dont see you say its a theory here?

I see So yeah he stacked quite abit.

To me that is not trying to apply thoery that is you tell someone they are wrong and you are right.

Also you say he trys to defend every incoming

Again if this was a theory of yours id expect a comment such as, it seems/ I guess he defends every incoming <<<< that would be speaking theoretically.

Now stop, look and remember what you posted and understand the difference between telling someone they are worng.

Thus meaning im not trolling theorys, im disproving a very sad little lonely child who needs to reply to every post so he feels like he has someone to talk to.

Also the IFS im working off are yours, what you said to try and prove pacman wrong, so you actually proved yourself wrong and all i had to do was pull your words together to show how biased and dim you really are.

/ends replies as he feels rawr will never learn or understand how patheticaly stupid his rambles are.

if you read in my other post, i said i should have worded it differently yes, so your arguement is mute since i admitted i should have worded it differently.

now who is the one rambling, i admit i shouldve worded it different and you still try to argue the issue lol!

why would i be biased? you do realise i have friends in PACMAN yes? ok thanks. i never said they wasnt good players. just stating my opinons. opinons cant be wrong as they are your opinons..

/end of ramble or whatever you call it these days.

 

[One Last Shot...]

why would i be biased?

Good question.

Let's see. You're in Manic. This thread is Manic declaring on Pacman. Yes, I can't see any reason whatsoever for you to be biased.

Don't just type. Try thinking first.
/inbefore "you're biased too" - completely irrelevant to my post, but I know that it is likely coming as trolls are predictable

 

[DeletedUser]

Good question.

Let's see. You're in Manic. This thread is Manic declaring on Pacman. Yes, I can't see any reason whatsoever for you to be biased.

Don't just type. Try thinking first.
/inbefore "you're biased too" - completely irrelevant to my post, but I know that it is likely coming as trolls are predictable

if i was biased, i wouldnt have trolled FORK, GBears, MANIC, PACMAN, and Bully. perhaps since you was late to the party, perhaps do some research before you actually post next time.

ever occur i just troll because i can?

secondly your Co/player is my friend, and we share alot of the same view point of what is to come between MANIC and PACMAN. so by no means am i biased. i see things, how i see thing. im stubborn i know this. :lol:

trying to be cute with the hidden message is not becoming fail *facepalm*

 

[One Last Shot...]

if i was biased, i wouldnt have trolled FORK, GBears, MANIC, PACMAN, and Bully. perhaps since you was late to the party, perhaps do some research before you actually post next time.

ever occur i just troll because i can?

secondly your Co/player is my friend, and we share alot of the same view point of what is to come between MANIC and PACMAN. so by no means am i biased. i see things, how i see thing. im stubborn i know this. :lol:

trying to be cute with the hidden message is not becoming fail *facepalm*

Considering you would have instead of having to try and argue that you are not biased, say that I am biased in my posting (which I am, like everybody else in Pacman or Manic on this thread), the hidden message was successful in preventing the easy troll option you would have instead gone for :icon_wink:

You were slating Pacman for a largely unsuccessful op. FACT.
You were trying to defend Manic for an equally unsuccessful op. FACT.

Therefore, you are biased.

However you put it, you are biased. Whatever friends you have/you may think you have/secretly think you're an idiot, does not mean you are unbiased. You are in a tribe, flaming for that tribe against another tribe, and refuse to accept that your tribe is failing in doing real damage to the tribe they declared on. You. Are. Biased.

I think I made my point clear. But I'll say it once more.


However many times you say you are unbiased, and whatever arguments you try to come up with for being "unbiased", you are quite clearly biased. End of.

 

[DeletedUser]

Considering you would have instead of having to try and argue that you are not biased, say that I am biased in my posting (which I am, like everybody else in Pacman or Manic on this thread), the hidden message was successful in preventing the easy troll option you would have instead gone for :icon_wink:

You were slating Pacman for a largely unsuccessful op. FACT.
You were trying to defend Manic for an equally unsuccessful op. FACT.

Therefore, you are biased.

However you put it, you are biased. Whatever friends you have/you may think you have/secretly think you're an idiot, does not mean you are unbiased. You are in a tribe, flaming for that tribe against another tribe, and refuse to accept that your tribe is failing in doing real damage to the tribe they declared on. You. Are. Biased.

I think I made my point clear. But I'll say it once more.


However many times you say you are unbiased, and whatever arguments you try to come up with for being "unbiased", you are quite clearly biased. End of.

oh ok google you caught me totally biased. :icon_rolleyes:

you know me better then i know myself :lol:

you are just to dim to actually go back and check that i flame everybody, none the less its a mute arguement.

anyways back on topic PACMAN sucks

 

[One Last Shot...]

you are just to dim to actually go back and check that i flame everybody, none the less its a mute arguement.

Why would the fact that I know that all you are capable of is trolling (from seeing you on the W52 forum before you got owned by a family tribe, & your excuses for it), meaning I don't need to bother reading all your pathetic comments on W57 to know all you do is troll, make me dim?

 

[DeletedUser]

Why would the fact that I know that all you are capable of is trolling (from seeing you on the W52 forum before you got owned by a family tribe, & your excuses for it), meaning I don't need to bother reading all your pathetic comments on W57 to know all you do is troll, make me dim?

W58 you mean and i didnt get owned lol.. just so you get your story straight.

[8/26/2011 10:43:40 AM] Rawr Mode: sure you do first off OWO merged into -MM-
[8/26/2011 10:43:47 AM] Rawr Mode: -MM- sold us out when dave quit to SWAT
[8/26/2011 10:43:54 AM] Rawr Mode: i quit during that time due to that though i was pretty inactive
[8/26/2011 10:44:00 AM] Rawr Mode: they attacked me i defended
[8/26/2011 10:44:09 AM] Rawr Mode: then i left after they stopped new owner joined SWAT
[8/26/2011 10:44:15 AM] Rawr Mode: i came back left SWAT and deleted
[8/26/2011 10:44:16 AM] Rawr Mode: end of story

so yeah you believe whatever lav tells you lol please tell me why my account got nobled after i left SWAT?

just confirms my story, i never had support cause they didnt noble me till after i hit delete. moron lol. so yeah go believe what your hugging family lav said.

thought so...months later after the fact.

you can ask Swanny or TNK or TWP they will tell you the same thing. they sold out K36 and K37 for a diplomacy deal, so how did i get a ton of tribal support? curious.

perhaps since you was on the otherside of the world, you wouldnt know a thing. always 2 sides to every story. :lol:

yeah but go ahead and believe lav

 

[DeletedUser]

oh ok google you caught me totally biased. :icon_rolleyes:

you know me better then i know myself :lol:

you are just to dim to actually go back and check that i flame everybody, none the less its a mute arguement.

anyways back on topic PACMAN sucks

Then please show it in game rather than talking crap on the forums.

 

[DeletedUser]

Then please show it in game rather than talking crap on the forums.

just did sniping all your trains. im impressed nice timing still off just abit though. cheers. :lol: .70 ms is rough

i give you that lol.

 

[DeletedUser]

just did sniping all your trains. im impressed nice timing still off just abit though. cheers. :lol: .70 ms is rough

i give you that lol.

70ms train or 70ms gap equaling 280ms? thats impressive either way but which one?

 

[DeletedUser]

70ms train or 70ms gap equaling 280ms? thats impressive either way but which one?

nuke timed infront of a .300 ms train at .70 ms infront of the train that i sniped. was a pain to lol

also was a nuke in between a train which was good but still got sniped. all in all good work both sides.

 

[DeletedUser]

nuke timed infront of a .300 ms train at .70 ms infront of the train that i sniped. was a pain to lol

also was a nuke in between a train which was good but still got sniped. all in all good work both sides.

Wait...? You telling me no-one on the MANIC frontline can snipe so they get you from the North to do it for them? Cool.