DeletedUser111879
Guest
Read the thread before you reply. It is apparent to me that it is now impossible to split/destroy/snipe a 100ms noble train (4 consecutive attacks).
I'll explain my reasons. Today I was attacked and the times of the attacker were as such:
0004. He just loved to Rename today at 19:31:32:482 1:36:43 Request support for this attack
0004. He just loved to Rename today at 19:31:32:607 1:36:43 Request support for this attack
0004. He just loved to Rename today at 19:31:32:768 1:36:43 Request support for this attack
0004. He just loved to Rename today at 19:31:32:939 1:36:43 Request support for this attack
I had sent an attack at a barbarian village that was 00:50:00 minutes away, the attack would land at the barbarian at 18:41:32:711, and supposed to return home at 19:31:32:711.... Thus splitting his 4 attacks in half. 2 hit, 2 die.
Well, when my attack HIT the barbarian village it's return time CHANGED to 19:31:32:000, meaning my snipe would have failed. Luckily for me he only sent fakes.
Before, you were allowed to snipe trains. Now you cannot. PLEASE fix this bug.
I'll explain my reasons. Today I was attacked and the times of the attacker were as such:
0004. He just loved to Rename today at 19:31:32:482 1:36:43 Request support for this attack
0004. He just loved to Rename today at 19:31:32:607 1:36:43 Request support for this attack
0004. He just loved to Rename today at 19:31:32:768 1:36:43 Request support for this attack
0004. He just loved to Rename today at 19:31:32:939 1:36:43 Request support for this attack
I had sent an attack at a barbarian village that was 00:50:00 minutes away, the attack would land at the barbarian at 18:41:32:711, and supposed to return home at 19:31:32:711.... Thus splitting his 4 attacks in half. 2 hit, 2 die.
Well, when my attack HIT the barbarian village it's return time CHANGED to 19:31:32:000, meaning my snipe would have failed. Luckily for me he only sent fakes.
Before, you were allowed to snipe trains. Now you cannot. PLEASE fix this bug.
Last edited by a moderator: