DeletedUser
Guest
I'm not blind... lol xD
"You just do not know", from the Translator.
Come to the german Graphics "Bereich?" and look.
"You just do not know", from the Translator.
Come to the german Graphics "Bereich?" and look.
Burning GFX
Guest
Thanks for the feed back guys
DeletedUser
Guest
Thanks for the feed back guys
NAIS. Could do with some depth though... Looks too much like he's part of the background. Well that's how it's supposed to be, but it seems as if you're not focusing on him.
Burning GFX
Guest
I know i did try t focus more on his well face i spose... but its hard when the render is the same colors and lighting as the rest of the picer,
But i like the outcome
But i like the outcome
mattoematt
Guest
The background has that stupid effect on it ruining the whole piece. Remove that effect and blur it a bit.
DeletedUser
Guest
No it doesn't. Removing and blurring will make the whole sig simple and fail.
mattoematt
Guest
Yes it does. Stop talking, you are insignificant.
DeletedUser
Guest
You think using well punctuated constructions and slightly more complex syntax makes you superior? No. You're wrong. So just sit there in your wrongness and be wrong.
And no it doesn't. If you seem so certain, why not make one yourself and show us what you're talking about?
And no it doesn't. If you seem so certain, why not make one yourself and show us what you're talking about?
mattoematt
Guest
This is an assumption based on what? If I was doing what you are suggesting I would be picking away at the grammatical and punctual errors in your post - I am not.
It's just basic's to see. The effect completely ruins the flow and depth of that signature.
DeletedUser
Guest
No, you wouldn't be. You'd be trying to do so, but failing because there are very few.
It does ruin the depth and flow slightly. But not completely, and is better than some bad brushing and no blending which typically comes from the average user. Furthermore, how would it be changed without having to remake the sig from the first layer? You've got to build your comments around the person's skill level.
mattoematt
Guest
Yet I'm not which makes your original point useless.
Considering it's nearly 3/4 of the signature it does completely (some variation allowed) and it looks as if just one layer with an effect and the blending layers are seperate although I could be wrong.
DeletedUser
Guest
No, it doesn't mean you wouldn't do it if there were grammatical errors in my writing.
If you actually look at it you will see that there is definitely more than one layer present. And the way the render is positioned, the effect you are commenting on only takes up about 1/3, not 3/4, of the sig.
DeletedUser
Guest
I like the way two people are arguing over CnC, which when given depends upon your own opinion
So basically you guys are arguing about you having two different opinions; in my opinion.
So basically you guys are arguing about you having two different opinions; in my opinion.
DeletedUser
Guest
So it seems. =P
Burning GFX
Guest
I came to a shock when i done this
I made MYSELF a siggy :O
whoa
I made MYSELF a siggy :O
whoa
DeletedUser
Guest
I came to a shock when i done this
I made MYSELF a siggy :O
whoa
OMG. I have yet to do that. I've never actually thought about it. xD
Burning GFX
Guest
hehe =P you should you are pretty good
Burning GFX
Guest
This is me experimenting CnC is loved as always
DeletedUser
Guest
This is me experimenting CnC is loved as always
Ewwww thats rubbish, made me ill :icon_redface:
JK, looks good sammy
Burning GFX
Guest
Thanks sis <3
