Cards: No more aces left

DeletedUser108799

Guest
you are wrong it is 7 on 1 now and still winning that is bAd.

I also have intel it will soon be 8 on 1(rofl)

So bAd against Ace, Ace2 , Acebop, Ptt, Ptt2 ,Rotp, Penta and another tribe.
 

ALessonInPointWhoring

Contributing Poster
Reaction score
408
sidd 271 said:
5 on 1 and still losing:lol:
Click to expand...

Actually, that frequently makes the charts look better for the one tribe than it otherwise would.

Let's say we have 5 tribes.

We'll call them A, B, C, D, and E.

A is warring B, the war is fairly close.

A is also nobling members of C, D, and E.

A vs. B graph would look fairly even.

A vs. B, C, D, E would look like A was dominating in a 4 vs. 1 despite them actually dominating 3 tribes that aren't banded together or working together, while fighting A.

Adding your "food" to the enemy side of charts is a frequent way to try and make your tribes stats appear better than they really are because sure it's more tribes you could lose villages to, but it's also more tribes that your nobles against show for.

EDIT:

Example:

Side 1:
Tribes: bAd
Side 2:
Tribes: PTT 2

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers:

Side 1: 468
Side 2: 188
Difference: 280

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 4
Side 2: 0
Difference: 4

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 2,616,137
Side 2: 640,693
Difference: 1,975,444

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 17,203
Side 2: 0
Difference: 17,203

chart
 
Last edited:

DeletedUser106973

Guest
In response to ALessonInPointWhoring:

You're right and I understand exactly where your coming from. It would make the stats look better than if we were warring 1 tribe but the fact is that is we are at least indirectly warring all of these tribes. For the most part, it is just Ace/Acebop vs bAd however all of the others we add to the stats are added because they joined the war and apparently want their stats the count (only tribe with exception to this is Penta as they have not officially joined the declaration)
We did not want to war all of these tribes at once, but if they joined the war then we'll count the stats and treat them all as one team, as opposed to individual tribes.

regardless, bAd is beating every tribe individually, be it by small numbers or not.

328d04d156a6232ff85a0ffaa2a97749
328d04d156a6232ff85a0ffaa2a97749
328d04d156a6232ff85a0ffaa2a97749
 

DeletedUser106973

Guest
Encrypted Apocalypse said:
I dont think, sidd was wrong with that statement. The way I read it is pretty clear. I thought, he ment, that even when going 5 on 1 on you, they cant win. Or is my english simply so bad, that I misunderstood that...
Click to expand...

the only reason he's wrong is that there are more than 5 tribes

Ace, Ace2, Acebop, HALLO, PTT, PTT2, Penta
 

DeletedUser108799

Guest
ALessonInPointWhoring said:
Actually, that frequently makes the charts look better for the one tribe than it otherwise would.

Let's say we have 5 tribes.

We'll call them A, B, C, D, and E.

A is warring B, the war is fairly close.

A is also nobling members of C, D, and E.

A vs. B graph would look fairly even.

A vs. B, C, D, E would look like A was dominating in a 4 vs. 1 despite them actually dominating 3 tribes that aren't banded together or working together, while fighting A.

Adding your "food" to the enemy side of charts is a frequent way to try and make your tribes stats appear better than they really are because sure it's more tribes you could lose villages to, but it's also more tribes that your nobles against show for.

EDIT:

Example:

Side 1:
Tribes: bAd
Side 2:
Tribes: PTT 2

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers:

Side 1: 468
Side 2: 188
Difference: 280

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 4
Side 2: 0
Difference: 4

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 2,616,137
Side 2: 640,693
Difference: 1,975,444

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 17,203
Side 2: 0
Difference: 17,203

chart
Click to expand...

There is a reason why we are counting all of these tribes because they are all supporting the front which makes it way more difficult for us to take a village and when we noble that village we still see 10-20 incoming supports from all these tribes.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Would like to thank a few ACE members for the ODD and quite possibly DOTD award from their "OP", much appreciated. Roughly 20 noblemen dead today and still more to come :)

And yes, I know this post makes me come off as an enormous prick, but what would the forums be like without posts like this?
 

DeletedUser112896

Guest
I'd be the first to admit that our war stats are lacking of as when Steven and Illuminaz decieded to quit. Most of the Illuminaz villages are secured. Steven we have taken for a loss.

I think this should explain more.

[spoil]Side 1: Players: Steven43, illuminaz
Side 2:
Tribes: ACE, ACE_KB, ACE *, Ace., PTT, PTT 2


Timeframe: Last week


Total conquers against opposite side:


Side 1: 0
Side 2: 53
Difference: 53


chart



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:


Side 1: 0
Side 2: 429,499
Difference: 429,499


chart



[/spoil]

This war will take full flow when the internals are done.
 

DeletedUser112896

Guest
DaWolf85 said:
Why would it take full flow now when it hasn't before?
Click to expand...

New leadership for one. Things are falling into shape with the internals. Of course I can say what I want, we'll just have to show you.
 

darkaniken2

Guest
5GHKy.png


If you can't win by fighting, win by recruiting?

Player Action Date/Time Points
apgff2006 Joined 09th December 2013 - 01:07 695,706
TRDescard Joined 09th December 2013 - 01:07 236,436
 
rickyson1

rickyson1

Contributing Poster
Reaction score
143
darkaniken2 said:
5GHKy.png


If you can't win by fighting, win by recruiting?

Player Action Date/Time Points
apgff2006 Joined 09th December 2013 - 01:07 695,706
TRDescard Joined 09th December 2013 - 01:07 236,436
Click to expand...


iamkane said:
I'd be the first to admit that our war stats are lacking of as when Steven and Illuminaz decieded to quit. Most of the Illuminaz villages are secured. Steven we have taken for a loss.

I think this should explain more.

[spoil]Side 1: Players: Steven43, illuminaz
Side 2:
Tribes: ACE, ACE_KB, ACE *, Ace., PTT, PTT 2


Timeframe: Last week


Total conquers against opposite side:


Side 1: 0
Side 2: 53
Difference: 53


chart



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:


Side 1: 0
Side 2: 429,499
Difference: 429,499


chart



[/spoil]

This war will take full flow when the internals are done.
Click to expand...

iamkane said:
New leadership for one. Things are falling into shape with the internals. Of course I can say what I want, we'll just have to show you.
Click to expand...


it all makes sense now
 

darkaniken2

Guest
What I don't get is why ACE players would move. They're only a little behind bad overall, and the recent stats are virtually tied. Yea, they're bleeding atrociously elsewhere, but given that ACE seems to lack the ability to work as a tribe, what do these players care what happens to their tribemates on the opposite front?
 
rickyson1

rickyson1

Contributing Poster
Reaction score
143
oh bad

gone bad

ran into a tribe named Ace and just pounded away cause it wasn't a race

couldn't even break em so decided to just take em

oh bad

gone bad

your former duke got mad about ace but you dont even care cause you needed more tribe space

oh bad

gone bad
 

DeletedUser

Guest
rickyson1 said:
oh bad

gone bad

ran into a tribe named Ace and just pounded away cause it wasn't a race

couldn't even break em so decided to just take em

oh bad

gone bad

your former duke got mad about ace but you dont even care cause you needed more tribe space

oh bad

gone bad
Click to expand...

This news must be significant
If Ricky's writing rhyme
DSy4's Gang's alright & thriving:
ACE are Boring, most the time.
Except - today - some's been absorbed;
That's one down, 2 to go
So we'll just keep on keeping on
& oust the whole trio....



 
Last edited by a moderator:

Repinski

Guest
​Come on bAd! Just three more members and you can have the most out of the top 25! You can do it! :icon_rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top