DeletedUser
Guest
Instead of having huge family tribes in the future, would a change in the member limit be good later on? Discuss.
mattcurr
Guest
No, just no
DeletedUser
Guest
It would help some families cut off their extra branches, and become single tribes. So I'm all for it. :icon_biggrin:
DeletedUser
Guest
I'd say no,
my reason for saying it... when many get bored/semi-active the world would not stagnate like many worlds for the prime reason that the tribe can't afford to carry semi dead players and/or hold them for ages getting someone to hand the account over to(in full).
I think(this is opinion) if anything the huge families may reduce as time goes on. I don't think families(even allies) work that well here anyhow due to the support being for own tribe only. It may be interesting to see how innovative ways to cope with the settings are found, you know it will happen, I'm sure other people are thinking of ideal setups also.
In summation, I think it would be short term benefit, long term harm as the world matures. Surely if people wanted to play a 40/100/1000 tribe member limit, they wouldn't have started w34.
my reason for saying it... when many get bored/semi-active the world would not stagnate like many worlds for the prime reason that the tribe can't afford to carry semi dead players and/or hold them for ages getting someone to hand the account over to(in full).
I think(this is opinion) if anything the huge families may reduce as time goes on. I don't think families(even allies) work that well here anyhow due to the support being for own tribe only. It may be interesting to see how innovative ways to cope with the settings are found, you know it will happen, I'm sure other people are thinking of ideal setups also.
In summation, I think it would be short term benefit, long term harm as the world matures. Surely if people wanted to play a 40/100/1000 tribe member limit, they wouldn't have started w34.
DeletedUser
Guest
No. And i don't feel the need to discuss it any further tbh
DeletedUser
Guest
I'm with Matt and DN on this one. What would be the point in starting a world with certain settings only to change them because they weren't as popular as other worlds? It would only make the people who do enjoy the sittings to become agitated at the change, and most likely not want to play anymore themselves.
EDIT: And with Rancid too, since he posted at the same time as me.
EDIT: And with Rancid too, since he posted at the same time as me.
DeletedUser
Guest
I say no as well, i just thought about bringing it up.
DeletedUser
Guest
I kind of like the smaller tribes, more comraderie.
DeletedUser
Guest
no wai!
Allthough i was expecting more better players in this world, but still 20 is fine, it should never be changed ;D
Allthough i was expecting more better players in this world, but still 20 is fine, it should never be changed ;D
Muller21
Guest
They would never change it in the middle of a world. I wouldnt think....So its not something we goto worry about.
darrylh
Guest
Nope.
DeletedUser
Guest
Real in-depth analysis there Darryl :icon_biggrin:
Muller21
Guest
He's rather good at the whole real indepth thing.
frostyfingers
Guest
I think having smaller limits makes you focus more on politics to take down the bigger enemies...
It promotes diplomacy and makes you actually act on supporting and attacking with allies. Most tribe with a member limit of 50 in other worlds find thier members go inactive, thier allies turn on them, and players are disposable since they can have so many...
Keep small limit IMO...
It promotes diplomacy and makes you actually act on supporting and attacking with allies. Most tribe with a member limit of 50 in other worlds find thier members go inactive, thier allies turn on them, and players are disposable since they can have so many...
Keep small limit IMO...
DeletedUser
Guest
Er, hello? You do know you can't support anyone outside of your tribe on this world, don't you?:icon_neutral:
DeletedUser
Guest
This guy sends out random invites, It doesn't surprise me at all 
DeletedUser
Guest
well we start playing this world cause of the small tribe limit so it should stay that way
mar71n
Guest
It should stay at 20 and more worlds like it should be created. It's easier to defend when in goliath vs peewee situation.
frostyfingers
Guest
....
random invites? its possible you just ignored the IGM I sent in first month of the world...otherwise I would say it was because you showed promise early on...either way congratz on making yourself look like a jerk
as for the support, I was referring to supporting within the tribe and supporting as in with attacks via fakes and nobling down villas...last time i checked you could do both
This guy sends out random invites, It doesn't surprise me at all
random invites? its possible you just ignored the IGM I sent in first month of the world...otherwise I would say it was because you showed promise early on...either way congratz on making yourself look like a jerk
as for the support, I was referring to supporting within the tribe and supporting as in with attacks via fakes and nobling down villas...last time i checked you could do both
DeletedUser
Guest
I'm talking about inviting benager, who I was sitting and I joined, remember?
I look like a jerk? At least this jerk knows how to play. Thus, he beats you.
Attacking together isnt supporting. Get out.
I look like a jerk? At least this jerk knows how to play. Thus, he beats you.
Attacking together isnt supporting. Get out.
