Half-price Nobles Countdown

Michael Wittman

Contributing Poster
but.. but..
i think.. internal is better than those who love 2k barbs so much... :v

that would be the case if they actually used those internals to fight but now they have pitiful scratchings at tribes ten times smaller them yet you defend this disgusting behaviour. smh....... well to each their own, i prefer fighters who understand the thrill of battle
 
Last edited by a moderator:

War Hamster

Still Going Strong
oh you think you are beating us because you eat small players like a child? i lol at you
I actually challenged Mara who was sitting at 850k before my run. That is approx. a 2-300k difference in a one on one. So not exactly one of your smaller players but one of your core players. I do think I made my point. Your so called big gun turtles are not untouchable.

Yes your tribe recapped 8 or so but mara herself only got 3 back. Think of the damage there. As I take more villages my strength grows and your partial nukes and same village fakes grow ever more "useless".

Your time for ranting on the pnp and mailing me in game about my last chance to kick the Sierra peeps or there will be no peace will soon be at an end. This month, next month it really does not matter you will be escorted out by the beginning of summer as a for sure bet. Even your friends cannot prevent this.
 

Michael Wittman

Contributing Poster
War have you ever thought that K13/23 players are just shit. That's my view on them all, end of.
lol well that may be your view but in reality you are 10 times our size and we will push you back very soon.

you think because you can take 10-50 villas against small players who are isolated or in glads case you lost sooooooo much more than you gained which we accept, and we will take it back

so when reality sets in i expect you to be a good trooper and accept the fact that you cant handle a tribe 1/10 of your size. because you are not good or you do not have good teamates i do not know but we are coming for you
 

Michael Wittman

Contributing Poster
I actually challenged Mara who was sitting at 850k before my run. That is approx. a 2-300k difference in a one on one. So not exactly one of your smaller players but one of your core players. I do think I made my point. Your so called big gun turtles are not untouchable.

Yes your tribe recapped 8 or so but mara herself only got 3 back. Think of the damage there. As I take more villages my strength grows and your partial nukes and same village fakes grow ever more "useless".

Your time for ranting on the pnp and mailing me in game about my last chance to kick the Sierra peeps or there will be no peace will soon be at an end. This month, next month it really does not matter you will be escorted out by the beginning of summer as a for sure bet. Even your friends cannot prevent this.
it does not work like that bro. you know an attack on one is an attack on all. well maybe you are getting used to that in your tribe where you just leave players to die
 

Michael Wittman

Contributing Poster
I actually challenged Mara who was sitting at 850k before my run. That is approx. a 2-300k difference in a one on one. So not exactly one of your smaller players but one of your core players. I do think I made my point. Your so called big gun turtles are not untouchable.

Yes your tribe recapped 8 or so but mara herself only got 3 back. Think of the damage there. As I take more villages my strength grows and your partial nukes and same village fakes grow ever more "useless".

Your time for ranting on the pnp and mailing me in game about my last chance to kick the Sierra peeps or there will be no peace will soon be at an end. This month, next month it really does not matter you will be escorted out by the beginning of summer as a for sure bet. Even your friends cannot prevent this.
and yes that is what i am saying. kick the sierra players and we have instant peace. otherwise we ill enjoy taking you villages
 

Michael Wittman

Contributing Poster
For a tribe who's allegedly doing as well as yours, you sure as hell are very keen on peace.
lol i dont want peace! its just that the rest of loading and us got along quite well until they took the sierra players in. i said it would come to this. they just thought they could beat us. but now they are 10 times our size and have to fight very hard to make any gains.

i was just pointing out the whole fact that the spartans broke with loading over sierra
 

MR.MR

Contributing Poster
Michael, you prance around these forums talking as if you and your Spartan teammates are delivering some unprecedented ass-kicking against Loading. That we are unable to handle SPEL. That we are losing. The stats, simple facts, tell a vastly different story.

Forever Stats
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: 21.3%
Side 2:
Tribes: SPEL, SPKW

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,142
Side 2: 569
Difference: 1,573



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 15,682,549
Side 2: 4,936,185
Difference: 10,746,364


[/spoil]

Last 3 Months:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: 21.3%
Side 2:
Tribes: SPEL, SPKW

Timeframe: Last 3 months

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,224
Side 2: 239
Difference: 985



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 8,253,743
Side 2: 2,071,421
Difference: 6,182,322


[/spoil]

Last Month
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: 21.3%
Side 2:
Tribes: SPEL, SPKW

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 350
Side 2: 119
Difference: 231



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,188,857
Side 2: 1,061,423
Difference: 1,127,434


[/spoil]

Last Week
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: 21.3%
Side 2:
Tribes: SPEL, SPKW

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 59
Side 2: 17
Difference: 42



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 342,216
Side 2: 135,359
Difference: 206,857


[/spoil]

Michael, there is literally NO timeframe that you can consider your Spartans to be winning, pushing Loading back, or doing anything remotely successful in this war. The Spartan coalition didn't even win the initial week of the war despite having the jump on us through the fake NAP you agreed to in order to get us to dump all defense near you to our frontlines. I commend individual players within Spartan legions, there are some very determined players with an amazing ability to keep trying and never quit - better than many of the players in Loading, in that regard. I don't knock anyone's individual commitments to the war effort. But to come on here talking your effervescent bullshit as if you are raping us so hard that you've opened the space-time-continuum, is undeniably wrong. Your excuse about picking off isolated players - was K31 isolated when it was owned by Spartans? What about K32 when it was half owned by Spartans? Xanath being completely surrounded in K22 by miles of Spartans owning the whole K is definitely a case of us only taking isolated villages, right? He hasn't been the isolated one that Spartans failed to take out, and has since dominated the Continent? No, you are right. Taking 2.5 whole Ks of Spartan territory, with their backs against the rims providing some safety and ability to concentrate D troops, is 100% us only taking isolated villages/players. It hasn't always been pretty, but slowly and surely we have pushed Spartans back one K at a time. K13 will move even slower, as only the most determined spartans still remain and you guys have nobled almost every barb to create a very dense cluster to defend from, but we will push our way through K13. Maybe North will let you all barble heavily in K14/15 to rebuild, though they have several helper tribes in K14/15 already. They probably will block you, Michael, as everyone in North literally hates you, but has let you survive only because you are an enemy-of-the-enemy. In fact you are probably less disliked by Loading members than North members.

Speaking of North, despite all of your forum posts where you reference Spartans beating Loading, and a fighting force 1/10 of the size, you don't like to stick to logic so the next retort out of your mouth is likely to be "well we are winning as an alliance" - the following stats show otherwise. I take pride in ensuring that players are not kicked from Loading (and other tribes I lead) no matter how many villages they lose and no matter the circumstances lost, so you can save the "kicked players" routine. The following stats, not including all of our conquers from CRASH + players that left CRASH, have Loading in the lead by more than 1000 villages. Likely a 1500 village lead when CRASH/dismissals are incorporated.

North has outcapped us by 485 villages in 2016 - they have played remarkably well, and a special kudos to MATTNSAMM - 2016 has seen him go from being in the top 5 most useless players (my opinion, based on war participation and OD) to being one of the best fighting accounts on W78 and one I would take on my team 10/10 times. But in 2016 Loading is +583 over SPEL + North combined. So despite all the hard work and grit that North has put in this year, thanks to you and your Spartans you have lost more than 2x as many as North has capped and the stats are negative overall.

Loading Vs Full Alliance
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: 21.3%
Side 2:
Tribes: SPEL, SPKW, North, TNub

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,353
Side 2: 1,309
Difference: 1,044



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 17,460,707
Side 2: 11,307,748
Difference: 6,152,959


[/spoil]

Again, kudos to North for fighting as hard as they have, this post isn't addressed to cut at them at all. But Michael, whether you want to talk about Spartans alone, or the entire SPEL + SPKW + North + TNub alliance that you are a part of, there is no permutation of overall stats that shows Michael Wittman and his Spartans doing anything that remotely looks like winning.
 
Last edited:

Michael Wittman

Contributing Poster
Michael, you prance around these forums talking as if you and your Spartan teammates are delivering some unprecedented ass-kicking against Loading. That we are unable to handle SPEL. That we are losing. The stats, simple facts, tell a vastly different story.

Forever Stats
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: 21.3%
Side 2:
Tribes: SPEL, SPKW

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,142
Side 2: 569
Difference: 1,573



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 15,682,549
Side 2: 4,936,185
Difference: 10,746,364


[/spoil]

Last 3 Months:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: 21.3%
Side 2:
Tribes: SPEL, SPKW

Timeframe: Last 3 months

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,224
Side 2: 239
Difference: 985



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 8,253,743
Side 2: 2,071,421
Difference: 6,182,322


[/spoil]

Last Month
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: 21.3%
Side 2:
Tribes: SPEL, SPKW

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 350
Side 2: 119
Difference: 231



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,188,857
Side 2: 1,061,423
Difference: 1,127,434


[/spoil]

Last Week
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: 21.3%
Side 2:
Tribes: SPEL, SPKW

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 59
Side 2: 17
Difference: 42



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 342,216
Side 2: 135,359
Difference: 206,857


[/spoil]

Michael, there is literally NO timeframe that you can consider your Spartans to be winning, pushing Loading back, or doing anything remotely successful in this war. The Spartan coalition didn't even win the initial week of the war despite having the jump on us through the fake NAP you agreed to in order to get us to dump all defense near you to our frontlines. I commend individual players within Spartan legions, there are some very determined players with an amazing ability to keep trying and never quit - better than many of the players in Loading, in that regard. I don't knock anyone's individual commitments to the war effort. But to come on here talking your effervescent bullshit as if you are raping us so hard that you've opened the space-time-continuum, is undeniably wrong. Your excuse about picking off isolated players - was K31 isolated when it was owned by Spartans? What about K32 when it was half owned by Spartans? Xanath being completely surrounded in K22 by miles of Spartans owning the whole K is definitely a case of us only taking isolated villages, right? He hasn't been the isolated one that Spartans failed to take out, and has since dominated the Continent? No, you are right. Taking 2.5 whole Ks of Spartan territory, with their backs against the rims providing some safety and ability to concentrate D troops, is 100% us only taking isolated villages/players. It hasn't always been pretty, but slowly and surely we have pushed Spartans back one K at a time. K13 will move even slower, as only the most determined spartans still remain and you guys have nobled almost every barb to create a very dense cluster to defend from, but we will push our way through K13. Maybe North will let you all barble heavily in K14/15 to rebuild, though they have several helper tribes in K14/15 already. They probably will block you, Michael, as everyone in North literally hates you, but has let you survive only because you are an enemy-of-the-enemy. In fact you are probably less disliked by Loading members than North members.

Speaking of North, despite all of your forum posts where you reference Spartans beating Loading, and a fighting force 1/10 of the size, you don't like to stick to logic so the next retort out of your mouth is likely to be "well we are winning as an alliance" - the following stats show otherwise. I take pride in ensuring that players are not kicked from Loading (and other tribes I lead) no matter how many villages they lose and no matter the circumstances lost, so you can save the "kicked players" routine. The following stats, not including all of our conquers from CRASH + players that left CRASH, have Loading in the lead by more than 1000 villages. Likely a 1500 village lead when CRASH/dismissals are incorporated.

North has outcapped us by 485 villages in 2016 - they have played remarkably well, and a special kudos to MATTNSAMM - 2016 has seen him go from being in the top 5 most useless players (my opinion, based on war participation and OD) to being one of the best fighting accounts on W78 and one I would take on my team 10/10 times. But in 2016 Loading is +583 over SPEL + North combined. So despite all the hard work and grit that North has put in this year, thanks to you and your Spartans you have lost more than 2x as many as North has capped and the stats are negative overall.

Loading Vs Full Alliance
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: 21.3%
Side 2:
Tribes: SPEL, SPKW, North, TNub

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,353
Side 2: 1,309
Difference: 1,044



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 17,460,707
Side 2: 11,307,748
Difference: 6,152,959


[/spoil]

Again, kudos to North for fighting as hard as they have, this post isn't addressed to cut at them at all. But Michael, whether you want to talk about Spartans alone, or the entire SPEL + SPKW + North + TNub alliance that you are a part of, there is no permutation of overall stats that shows Michael Wittman and his Spartans doing anything that remotely looks like winning.


lolololol yes except your information says you are killing us at a 4-1 ratio while you are 10-1 times our size. yea you suck. we can do this forever. other tribes will not let you be such children in battle haha because they actually have the same troop strength as you
 

MR.MR

Contributing Poster
"Hi my name is Michael Wittman. I am the face and mouth of SPEL, we are one portion of the coalition of Comet, North, SPEL, Anon, Home and TNub that is all working together jointly to take on Loading. Despite the fact that my tribe is only one small portion of a larger overall group all actively fighting across a 5K frontline, I am going to prance around the externals pretending that my tribe is the only tribe fighting Loading. My entire PnP strategy revolves around me claiming we are winning, once I am called out for lying about that, I will shift and try to claim that we are outnumbered 10-1 and thus Loading suck because they are only beating my tribe at a 4:1 ratio. I totally am going to pretend that my tribe is fighting Loading all alone because who needs facts, logic, and reality"

Seriously though, I wonder if you actually believe what comes out of your mouth or if you are just attempting to bluster even though you know when you look in the mirror you are full of crap. I am totally OK with you using the 10-1 outnumbered defense - as soon as you have every other tribe in your alliance stop attacking us and you face us ALONE. Loading vs SPEL with zero outside help is a 10:1 fight. So long as you fight alongside all the other tribes that are attacking us, you have no right to claim that you are outnumbered 10:1. More like 1.2:1 or 1.3:1 depending on how much of TNub you include in the weighting. Up to you - request of your allies that Spartans face us alone to prove your point of us not being able to destroy you at a big enough ratio despite our size advantage (which, by the way, this war started with Loading about 5:1 bigger than Spartans, and is now 10:1 because we've cut your tribe in half despite your rampant barbling to stay afloat), or keep fighting alongside all of your allies and stop coming to the externals to complain about being outsized.
 
Last edited:

jeruk

Active Member
no need to answer his word, asalamalakum, its useless no matter what you said... xD
in my country, there is a proverb more or less like this if translated to english, "let the dogs bark, the caravan passes"