Uf
Definitely not.
I wont say hoy many are sat but is not even 20%
Can i correct your typo? I think you meant "In the December Recruiting"
A merge is not a merge if you keep the name or tag. I think we have gone through that point like 100 times but you keep referring to a merge, with all the time that has passed now, cant you accept that was not a real merge?
Recruitment is generally when you only take select people. I guess we could call it a 'combination' instead of a 'merge'. I don't think when inviting the whole tribe at once it qualifies as a recruitment What we are doing _now_ might be called recruiting. We take who we choose. I barely call it recruiting now though because we aren't really trying that hard at it. When the whole tribe goes at once, that is not recruitment.
But yeah, I understand you call it a recruitment when two tribes combine without a tag change. I simply don't agree. On the other hand, I would be more inclined to call what you call a merge [with a tag change] where many are left behind, a recruitment, or perhaps a culling. I preferred to not leave anyone behind.
In short - you call it a recruitment if the tag doesn't change.
I call it a recruitment when only select people are invited and players are left behind.
So you guys (or your leaders) thought the tag was more important than inviting all your players so all could get pp. And you wonder why we want your two leaders dead?
Ending as allies was always my preferred choice anyway, and we know that was dismissed out of hand as well by -MM- at the time.
