~OU~ War Stats

stellro

Guest
hmmm - so losing now on 2 fronts - Im sure theres an obvious reason for this but for the life of me I cant think what it is :icon_razz:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
hmmm - so losing now on 2 fronts - Im sure theres an obvious reason for this but for the life of me I cant think what it is :icon_razz:

we won't be losing there for much longer, they are nobling only a player or 2 and those players will be gone soon i think =/ anyway i would like to see then what they will noble after they are gone :lol: perhaps they will spend 1 month searching for another little less active player and whole tribe will try to grab a vill or 2 :icon_biggrin: I have gained 5-6mil ODA in last 3 weeks (or maybe even less) only on 1 player and i didn't receive only 1 single fake attack :icon_neutral:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: =NWF=
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: ~OU~ WOTB
Players:

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 141
Side 2: 126
Difference: 15

image.php


where is =nwfa=? your projections are incorrect.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
yea...


Side 1:
Tribes: ~OU~ WOTB
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: =NWF= =NWFA=
Players:

Timeframe: Last month


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 159
Side 2: 146
Difference: 13

image.php



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,600,388
Side 2: 1,394,172
Difference: 206,216

image.php
 

stellro

Guest
I will remove my foot from my mouth - your astounding 13 village victory over the last month is enough to put me back in my place :icon_redface:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
its still a victory, and it still keeps us afloat does it now? we are winning against all ours enemies.
 

stellro

Guest
hmmm - Im not sure but if it makes you feel happy then who am I to take this away from you...

One point carried over from the other thread what you made is quite interesting however (and is stat related) - you said:

"we are NETTING villages through war, not barb taking, not inactive killing."

However in the stats for the last week you nobled 982 villages and only 249 villages belonged to enemies - so what was the other 733 villages if not barb nobling or inactive - or do OU have another enemy who is far more potent than the current enemies it faces????
 

DeletedUser

Guest
my only point was that against our enemies, all of them, we are netting villages. meaning we are still taking more overall than all of you are. sure we fatten up on other villages, who doesn't? but overall, we are taking more enemy villages than all of you three combined.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: ~OU~ WOTB
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: =NWF= =NWFA= ~GOH~ GOH-A =KK= =KR= =KM=
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 291
Side 2: 256
Difference: 35

image.php


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,815,190
Side 2: 2,546,398
Difference: 268,792

image.php
 

DeletedUser

Guest
my only point was that against our enemies, all of them, we are netting villages. meaning we are still taking more overall than all of you are. sure we fatten up on other villages, who doesn't? but overall, we are taking more enemy villages than all of you three combined.

Side 1:
Tribes: ~GOH~ GOH-A
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: ~OU~ WOTB
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 161
Side 2: 60
Difference: 101

image.php


Don't think of it as loosing villages in the south but gaining nobles for the wars you want :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
i think of it as LOOSING villages that we don't even need ;-) aahhahaha
 

DeletedUser

Guest
lmao i was jk. we will be getting everything and then some BACK.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Looks like ~OU~ is finally getting rid of there inactives. About freaken time.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
yea we are cleaning up a lot. we booted witman (what a pain) and we are going invite some rim players. lmfao
 

DeletedUser

Guest
really? ok! lmao. we will invite all your villages via nobles. ust clean them out, and we will get them assimilated quickly.
 
Top