DeletedUser
Guest
yes we do
so pwc/e have pretty much given up on taking inso vills and are doing their best to stay alive with intribe and barb nobles?Im glad you asked!
Here is what PWC & E nobled in the last 48 hours
Light blue = intribe
Grey = Barb
Red = INSO
[SPOIL][/SPOIL]
wow, wanna be more arrogant please?
wow, wanna be more arrogant please?
Ah shrek, doing your usual amount of research I see.fact is pwc/e planned well to take the outpost cluster from inso...but their plan called for that conquest to demoralize inso as well and it just didnt happen.
fact is pwc/e planned well to take the outpost cluster from inso...but their plan called for that conquest to demoralize inso as well and it just didnt happen..therfore when they tried to hit inso's core..they ran headfirst into a brick wall....
...you are wrong. As usual.
You missed what I was talking about, this supposed plan to get Inso to quit by taking villages in our area. The fact that we took 1k villages that were detached from Inso and 2000 that were near inso would tend to show that he is, well, completely ignorant.MSM is generally correct. Even by your figures, PWC gained 1K villas in a cluster 2 Ks detached from the rest of INSO, and many more in K15/25 that was detached from INSO, but nearby. Borderline outpost. A few hundred more were scattered elsewhere.
Aside from the Marco delete, PWC failed to dent the main battlefront.
You missed what I was talking about, this supposed plan to get Inso to quit by taking villages in our area. The fact that we took 1k villages that were detached from Inso and 2000 that were near inso would tend to show that he is, well, completely ignorant.
You are ignoring the facts, PWC was winning for months after the outposts were taken. How does this fit in to your supposed "failure as soon as they attacked the main part of Inso" scheme? Ohhhh thats right, it doesn't, how sad. :lol:wall of badly capitalized text
You are ignoring the facts, PWC was winning for months after the outposts were taken. How does this fit in to your supposed "failure as soon as they attacked the main part of Inso" scheme? Ohhhh thats right, it doesn't, how sad. :lol:
Did you even look at my map? "Most of these victories were the said outpost villages in the argument" I showed, apparently not clearly enough, that ~PWC took 2000 border villages and 1000 outpost villages. Now a margin is always attached to "most" but saying that most of ~PWC's conquers were outposts, well thats stretching it.Most of these victories were the said outpost villages in the argument. Once those were taken, PWC/E caused one blow to INSO by the deletion of Marco. After that PWC/E have made minimal gains.
While MSM may be ignoring some facts or not stating a dumb downed version of his case for you to understand, you're clearly twisting the facts(which comes of no surprise). PWC won for about 2 months. Most of these victories were the said outpost villages in the argument. Once those were taken, PWC/E caused one blow to INSO by the deletion of Marco. After that PWC/E have made minimal gains.
i think giving pwc any credit for marco's deletion is going a bit far..from what i have been able to gather marco was never really a "team" player nad his deletion appeared to come more out of his lack of give a dang than anything pwc/e ever did.
Bottom line: We gave ground where a defense would be too costly, and used the time to setup properly. This is sound strategy. It worked. Once again, our warriors have done more with less, overcome the odds, and dominated the enemy.