DeletedUser
Guest
Hum, what can be said about a rim tribe that is only capable of going to war with tribes Either A. much much smaller then them. or B. already been involved in a war elsewhere for weeks. Hum some would call this good battle strategy I suppose. Others would call it Cowardice. Really it doesn't matter what you call it I think. A tribe of many to further a few.
Lastly, what can be said about a small tribe that feels the need to have an academy? Especially when the academy has members that are bigger then the smaller members in the main? Yeah Fishy is am ample name for them, because all of it reeks to me. Hum lets take a close look at the tribe stats shall we
First 52 of the tribes nobles have been against members of the so called academy tribe Hum interesting. Especially when you take into account that the average member in there academy tribe has only 10 villages.
Then internally nobling is at 244 total (now i'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that some of those are double nobles) So lets say roughly 200 internal nobling
Then a whopping 1,126 nobles against players who have no tribe, and barbs.......ok now those numbers are kinda high.....especially when the tribe only has 2,112 villages in total thats over 50% of all player villages nobled from....Solo players...and barbs
Now then take into account the fact that almost all growth is regulated to about 10 people Now don't get me wrong the tribe itself is in growth. However almost all the growth from a percentage stand point is going to about 10 people Thats odd.
But no matter lets continue shall we.
The tribe Fish has had a constant growth spurt upwards while the "academy" tribe has been decreasing in strength exponentially starting a month against Guppy (there academy tribe?) has been loosing on average 2 villages a day to fish. Now I can understand wanting to trim the fat. However I'm wondering if they are trimming the fat in order to do away with the academy why are they still recruiting into it?
To me that tells me extreme under handed tactics of recruiting into a tribe for the sole purpose of ensuring a lack of support to that player when the time comes to. Yeah Fishy is a good name for this tribe I'm thinking
Lastly, what can be said about a small tribe that feels the need to have an academy? Especially when the academy has members that are bigger then the smaller members in the main? Yeah Fishy is am ample name for them, because all of it reeks to me. Hum lets take a close look at the tribe stats shall we
First 52 of the tribes nobles have been against members of the so called academy tribe Hum interesting. Especially when you take into account that the average member in there academy tribe has only 10 villages.
Then internally nobling is at 244 total (now i'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that some of those are double nobles) So lets say roughly 200 internal nobling
Then a whopping 1,126 nobles against players who have no tribe, and barbs.......ok now those numbers are kinda high.....especially when the tribe only has 2,112 villages in total thats over 50% of all player villages nobled from....Solo players...and barbs
Now then take into account the fact that almost all growth is regulated to about 10 people Now don't get me wrong the tribe itself is in growth. However almost all the growth from a percentage stand point is going to about 10 people Thats odd.
But no matter lets continue shall we.
The tribe Fish has had a constant growth spurt upwards while the "academy" tribe has been decreasing in strength exponentially starting a month against Guppy (there academy tribe?) has been loosing on average 2 villages a day to fish. Now I can understand wanting to trim the fat. However I'm wondering if they are trimming the fat in order to do away with the academy why are they still recruiting into it?
To me that tells me extreme under handed tactics of recruiting into a tribe for the sole purpose of ensuring a lack of support to that player when the time comes to. Yeah Fishy is a good name for this tribe I'm thinking