DeletedUser
Guest
I feel so bad about moving and I feel bad about not taking vills either, why not put a vote on it? Democracy is the way!
I vote for 21 member tribelimit!!!
Great idea, didn't think of that.this seems like a good idea you could also try to get the "only support those in your tribe option" which would hinder families from forming
Take for example TW in this world. They pretty much invented family tribes. They had about 700 members (mabe more) then they were stopped from being allowed to invite people and a 500 member limit was put in place. At the time they were up in arms. Now you are suggesting to the other way round and they're happy with it. Double standards much?
Well, the world has changed since TW times. For example, when TW still ruled there were a lot more people playing tribalwars. More people also means more activity. They were against it because that would have made their tribe weaker. At that time there was strength in numbers. Today, the only measure of strength is activity. With large numbers comes a lot of inactivity and the reasonable people of this world like activity.
The fact is that when large tribes hold on to lousy members just to look stronger, it only makes them look weaker.
I mean if some TRaP/HELL/WLE members had the guts to make a tribe of their own, like ToRe did, we'd certainly have more activity.
I don't see why we shouldn't vote about this, we've been voting for noble prices and fake limit before. If people disagree then we ger a no and topic will be closed.
Just like THAT wouldn't be drastic? :ODoubt tw would make such a drastic change this late even if 90%+ people wanted it. The 1 package per noble setting would liven up the world though