DeletedUser
Guest
lol :lol::lol::lol:
you are weak highque just like your tribe tbp.
We could throw insults at each other all day (if we would have time). Do you mind, if we bring the level a bit higher than 5-year old kids?
you can not support your selfs because of many reasons,ask your waterdrinker again how often he keept sending mails to JG members to support against AF,this is so funny how you put it.
it was not JG that was bitching about tbp been neutral,it was me who asked twice sirenna to not support vx against mainly my attacks on vx players,and you mention this,been honorable,well i can say sirenna has been "very honorable" to support me against life when tbp had NAP with each other,AND also support me against sirennas allies VX,yea you got it right,you want proof,i have ALL reports saved :icon_cool:
Ah, so it was the duke of -JG-, mailing the duke of TBP to stop supporting VX, which is of course not -JG- as a tribe, "complaining" to TBP. Wait... that makes no sense at all
NAP = Non Aggression Pact. Last time i checked, defending was not really considered aggression. So I don't see anything wrong in supporting an ally/NAP against a NAP. As a matter of fact, we never complained about GX supporting AF, while being NAP'ed to us. If you want more than a NAP, you shouldn't settle for a NAP.
I agree with you, that supporting a NAP against an ally is wrong. But I assume we are all humans, and that it is inevitable to have conflicting personal/tribal interests over 3 years of gaming. But one thing is, that sirenna was wrong. But I think it tells more about you, that you silently accepted the support, and claim that you kept the report as proof, in case you could use it against her in the future. Such a good friend you are.
as an old jg player i can say,when jg allies or naps had a fight with each other as a tribe they always stayed neutral back when mucklen and chrisw were still around,of course there were always couple that would get caught betwen those personal allies,that also got punished.
You are talking about the days, where tribes had 5-10 allies/NAPs, and it would be in your personal interest to either remain neutral (due to being busy with own wars), or drop NAP and jump into the war with your ally and kill the NAP tribe in a couple of months. Of course I can't be sure about your past NAP terms/conditions, but being neutral between NAP/ally, was probably a choice rather than a part of the deal.
And what is wrong to raise my new leaders,when they are so organized and strict,be a good leader and your tribe mates might follow you also,not supporting them will just lead to inactivity and depression as stated before,and you know this very well,dont form your own team in a tribe and leave the others outside.
lol you are such a wiseguy highque.
ps:you still cant get it off from your head about me saying "neutral",what did you want me to do,to exit the tribe for couple days and tell them,dont attack me because i want to be neutral on public forum lmao
There is nothing wrong in praising your leader. I only objected to the part, where you claimed to be neutral. I like my friends, but talking good about them is hardly neutral. So there is no reason for you to put up a silly show for the public, quitting LIFE for 1 day to post something. If you think, that would make you neutral, you clearly don't understand the word. It would be like saying, the day I moved away from my parents, all our relations were cut, and they are no more than random strangers. So my point was basically, that you should post whatever you want, but leave out the disclaimer: "Look everyone, I am being neutral in this post (praising my leader and badmouthing the other tribes).". Otherwise we end up with such lengthy discussions, where I have to explain most of the forum-active LIFE members, what "neutral" means