DeletedUser
Guest
»T.W«......
An attempt to lose all the in-actives? or to start again without the rubbish stats?
Personally I think its to start again with no stats at all Pathetic attempt wouldnt you say so?
Side 1:
Tribes: DNS ~DNS~
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: RAW =D-N= EDGE SOFt
Players:
Timeframe: Last month
Total conquers:
Side 1: 9,074
Side 2: 8,285
Difference: 789
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 2,790
Side 2: 1,691
Difference: 1,099
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 86,490,116
Side 2: 72,698,888
Difference: 13,791,228
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 27,431,817
Side 2: 16,079,429
Difference: 11,352,388
Also... what a rubbish first ever ennoblement :S
Village Points Old owner New owner Date/Time
Barbarian village (493|434) K44 9,387 Abandoned qioto [»T.W«] 18th Apr 2010 - 09:20:31
--- if this tribe is named TO WAR... what have we been doing the past year :S
SO... what do you guys think =p
An attempt to lose all the in-actives? or to start again without the rubbish stats?
Personally I think its to start again with no stats at all Pathetic attempt wouldnt you say so?
Side 1:
Tribes: DNS ~DNS~
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: RAW =D-N= EDGE SOFt
Players:
Timeframe: Last month
Total conquers:
Side 1: 9,074
Side 2: 8,285
Difference: 789
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 2,790
Side 2: 1,691
Difference: 1,099
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 86,490,116
Side 2: 72,698,888
Difference: 13,791,228
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 27,431,817
Side 2: 16,079,429
Difference: 11,352,388
Also... what a rubbish first ever ennoblement :S
Village Points Old owner New owner Date/Time
Barbarian village (493|434) K44 9,387 Abandoned qioto [»T.W«] 18th Apr 2010 - 09:20:31
--- if this tribe is named TO WAR... what have we been doing the past year :S
SO... what do you guys think =p