Top 15 Statistics

DeletedUser

Guest
top1591207mf5.jpg


Ennoblement List:
1 SCIOVA 392
2 RFG 363
3 V V V 352
4 ◄ EA � 277
5 E.T. 269
6 PKs 240
7 DFB 237
8 SCIR0N 229
9 TORORG 226
10 ~=AA=~ 210
11 Haita 197
12 ~=A=~ 194
13 DE 183
14 LotD 183
15 D.A. 175
16 TRUST 171
17 R2-HEL 163
18 SCIR0S 160
19 HOPLON 157
20 =V= 143

=======================================================================

top159507wv7.jpg


Ennoblement List:
1 SCIOVA 406
2 V V V 356
3 RFG 320
4 E.T. 316
5 SCIR0N 229
6 ◄ EA � 227
7 PKs 222
8 ~=A=~ 217
9 TORORG 201
10 Haita 198
11 D.A. 187
12 TRUST 168
13 DFB 167
14 ~=AA=~ 158
15 DE 146
16 =V= 146
17 LotD 144
18 SCIR0S 138
19 =DK= 124
20 HELLAS 102

=======================================================================

top1582807wv9.jpg


Ennoblement List:
1 SCIOVA 466
2 RFG 265
3 V V V 251
4 ~=A=~ 230
5 ◄ EA � 229
6 D.A. 225
7 TORORG 213
8 PKs 209
9 Haita 208
10 E.T. 207
11 LotD 192
12 SCIR0N 167
13 DE 155
14 DFB 151
15 =DK= 137
16 TRUST 136
17 SCIR0S 136
18 ~=AA=~ 131
19 Pagans 129
20 R2-HEL 113

=======================================================================

top1582107ip6.jpg


Ennoblement List:
1 SCIOVA 308
2 RFG 296
3 TORORG 241
4 PKs 238
5 E.T. 211
6 V V V 206
7 Haita 203
8 =DK= 188
9 ~=A=~ 179
10 ◄ EA � 177
11 SCIR0N 171
12 DFB 166
13 ~=AA=~ 155
14 D.A. 153
15 Pagans 146
16 DE 146

=======================================================================

top1581407ro5.jpg


Ennoblement list:
1 RFG 296
2 PKs 257
3 E.T. 239
4 TORORG 232
5 ◄ EA � 219
6 SCIOVA 208
7 V V V 198
8 DFB 196
9 Haita 169
10 D.A. 163
11 =DK= 156
12 Flame 152
13 ~=A=~ 151
14 SCIR0S 151
15 DE 144
16 Pagans 136
17 TRUST 131
18 TRT-H 127
=======================================================================


statistics8707xd5.jpg


=======================================================================

Part 1:
top1510407agp0.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

bongofury

Guest
any chance in you making a list of the opposite, the tribes that are doing the worst:icon_wink:
 

hot beef

Guest
what about one that shows the last month instead of just week?
 

DeletedUser14798

Guest
D.a.

D.A. :axemen: :axemen: :axemen: :axemen: :axemen: :axemen: :axemen: D.A.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
The number you want to keep a watch on is, Average points per player. Pks average over 400k while every other tribe is still in the 200k mark.

Because stats are measured for the top 40 members. Pks can , and are, essentially noble twice as much as any other tribe.

It is only until a tribe can close the APpP stat that PKs will be challenged for the #1 spot.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Data looks really good processed .. only thing that such statistic
period (1 week) is really too small ..

Performance over 1 week does not give cleat view how things really
goes .. some tribes recuperate, while other can be in peak of war ..

I would rater see 1-2 months change ... that should really say something
 

DeletedUser6458

Guest
I would rater see 1-2 months change ... that should really say something

I agree, it needs to be a much longer time frame than 7 days. To even be close to accurate.

I'd also like to see the stats on some of the tribes these top tribes are warring.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Guys, bluefusion is only doing this for a week, so how could he have data of a month ago?

As for the information:
Well, I was quite surprised myself that D.A. is doing so good, but PKs again prooves to be the best. SCIOVA seems to be the best inner-rim tribe (I won't devote over the actual value of a comparison between them and core tribes as i've done that already and I don't want this thread to go off-topic)
 

DeletedUser6458

Guest
I realize that iceco, I'm sure Herm does too.
Bluefusion did ask for feedback.

On that note, it would be interesting to see the differences the two week stats make.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Ugh, please don't refer to Hermilion as Herm, as you are my Herm, it makes this all too confusing
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I'll keep data my data and at the end of august make the comparison from the 1st to the 31st. A week is a pretty short time-frame, but in a way you can see who the week's ennoblement winner is, etc.

It also may give you a hint at whose in a war without declaring it, ie against a smaller tribe.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Ok, I admit.

I now declare war against K.3.W and !MS!, respectively number one and two of K3... with me being 3. Fear me! Because I do have nobles and you don't! Muhahahaha!

Does that count? :icon_rolleyes:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
well blue could you pls do next time the statistics by family/alliance? i think it will be more interesting to see LFKD stats and the rest of family tribes stats...
 

DeletedUser

Guest
The number you want to keep a watch on is, Average points per player. Pks average over 400k while every other tribe is still in the 200k mark.

Because stats are measured for the top 40 members. Pks can , and are, essentially noble twice as much as any other tribe.

It is only until a tribe can close the APpP stat that PKs will be challenged for the #1 spot.

well i will disagree with you.... PK has 64 members and if we look at the top 40 players we will see that PK has 12 members in this top Sciova has 3 members RFG has 4 ET has 5 DFB has 3 (dissapointing). But in the other side more than 50% of PKs has over 400kpts and more than 1/3 of pks has over than 500k pts... as the facts are presented i say that the growth is not represented by average pts per player...

as we look at number of conquered vills we will see SCIOVA's total domination over number of conquered vills. if i recal this is the 3rd week of domination for SCIOVA..

Rank Name conquered villages
1 SCIOVA 263
2 RFG 254
3 PKs 244
4 TORORG 214
5 ◄ EA � 209
6 Haita 167
7 LotD 164
8 ~=A=~ 163
9 SCIR0N 160
10 =DK= 156
11 V V V 154
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
dissapointing is to see DFB , ET and flame growth... i guess in one month DFB will lose his 2nd spot in the favor of .... SCIOVA...
 

DeletedUser6458

Guest
PK has 64 members and if we look at the top 40 players we will see that PK has 12 members in this top Sciova has 3 members RFG has 4 ET has 5 DFB has 3 (dissapointing).

I'm confused, what does this mean?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I'm confused, what does this mean?

i am sugesting that the average pts per player in PKs case (431,028) doesnt affect the growth
well the current statistics was made when LFKD declared war on AK AND HELLAS a good statistic should of been made with the growth of the tribe in the time of peace not in the time of war
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top