DeletedUser
Guest
Well the other top 20 tribe thread was closed due to spam, but now some good tribes are starting to emerge so I thought now we could get some real analysis here.
1 Axe! 39.426 74.069 96 772 96 772 : Spread out over roughly 2 Ks with some decent spacing, however I do see some pretty tight clusters. 96 members is a bit much. 7th for tribal ODA, and an average points per player. All-in-all has mass-recruit written all over it, but if they are farming well, then I think we could see them around for a bit longer than the usual mass-recruits.
2 iHate 38.379 73.245 96 763 96 763 : Clustered very heavily with 96 members. 8th for tribal ODA, with an average points per player. This tribe does not look very promising at all. Too clustered and they will end up suffocating themselves.
3 AnoNym 37.826 72.498 96 755 96 755 : This tribe has got me perplexed. They have 96 members which is a bit of a turn off, but their spacing throughout K 44 isn't completely horrible, and if they can manage to work out their farming areas, I could see them building a decently solid K. They are going to have to figure out a way to not suffocate their members on the inside. They have the #1 tribal ODA, and it looks like they have a couple solid players leading them (King Silva, first to 10K ODA). Their future could be promising.
4 MAGNUM 36.770 55.375 71 780 71 780 : Clustered almost as much as iHate. Their ranked 67th for tribal ODA. No exceptional players. This tribe won't last long.
5 =WAR= 35.687 68.983 95 726 95 726 : Still very clustered up. Tribal ODA ranked 6th. At 95 members they also have an academy with 98 members. That is not a good sign at all. Their #1 player though looks to be a solid player which leads me to think they may be hiding some more solid players in the line-up. We shall see with time.
6 Fools 35.492 54.936 81 678 81 678 : Pretty clustered up with 81 members. From what I understand, this is Grant's premade. That can have good or bad connotations. I see some notable players and at the same time I see alot of dead weight. My guess is bringing in turtling noobs to use as a blanket for the good players, and they will probably internal them or drop them off as time goes on and they solidify their core players. Show alot of potential, but at the same time their stability worries me.
7 ROFL 35.204 55.267 81 682 81 682 : Decent spacing, there are some players that are a bit spaced from the main area of the tribe. #3 in overall tribal ODA. There are some decent looking players, and could have a good go at dominating K 34 if they can fight off BRICK in the southeast corner.
8 Avenge 34.738 45.099 60 752 60 752 : At 60 members, they don't have the initial look of a mass-recruit tribe. However, I am wondering why almost a 3rd of their tribe is halfway across the world. That is a bit troubling. #4 tribal ODA. They have some solid players as well. They don't look half bad, but they need to figure out what they are going to do with those stragglers across the world.
9 BRICK 34.507 64.936 93 698 93 698 : 93 members, and an academy tribe with 75 members. Very clustered, and will likely have to fight ROFL in the near future (if they are still around). Not much to say for ODA, and doesn;t look like this tribe will last very long. Terrible tribe CoA as well.
10 GOLD 34.107 65.350 99 660 99 660 : 99 members all clustered up nice and tight. Only 1 player in the top 200. Tribal ODA is outside the top 20. This tribe won't last long.
11 SFU 33.441 62.332 94 663 94 663 : Another 90+ mass-recruit tribe. #10 tribal ODA. You know, I have started to notice that anytime
12 ClicK« 32.747 66.356 100 664 100 664 : We have our first 100 member tribe to analyze. To start off, 100 members...Fail. Almost completely clustered into 1 K. However, they do have a couple promising players. I see this tribe falling apart, but some of their members will make welcomed additions to some other tribes in that area.
13 VIP 32.562 57.494 87 661 87 661 : More clusters. A couple decent looking players. Outside the top 20 for tribal ODA. This tribe won't last long.
14 Hydra 32.553 63.655 93 684 93 684 : Pretty clustered into 1 K. Not very many promising looking players. 20th in tribal ODA. Unless there is no other competition in their area, I don't see them lasting long against a decent tribe.
15 WiFi 31.470 47.749 71 673 71 673 : Very clustered. Almost no stragglers. Outside the top 20 for tribal ODA. Directly in the center of the world. They will be gone within a few months.
16 L.O.C 31.105 58.150 95 612 95 612 : Clustered into 1 K. 19th tribal ODA. I don't see any players that I recognize. Looks like they will be fighting BOD soon. I don't seem lasting very long.
17 Exiled 30.854 56.181 95 591 95 591 : More clustering. Seems to be a recurring theme in the top 20 so far. Only a couple of tribes have shown promise in their clustering. This is not one of those promising tribes. #9 tribal ODA. Lowest points per player in the top 20. They won't last long with the likes of Fools, and iHate near them.
18 SWAT 30.562 49.163 83 592 83 592 : Clustered and #16 ODA. Not much to see in their member ranks. They won't make it long in the core. Second lowest points per player in the top 20.
19 Rabid 30.527 30.527 31 985 31 985 : Cluster? What Cluster? Very spread out and a lot of room for their members to farm. #2 ODA for the tribe and highest points per player in the top 20. They show more promise than any other tribe in the top 20, and that's with only 31 members. Some noticeable players. There are a good amount of players I can't tell who they are because of their alias. My only problem with this tribe is that some of their players are quite over-rated in my opinion. They have rushed up the ODA charts and padded their stats a bit, but that could mean that their troops are lacking at this point in the game. Could prove troublesome once nobles come out.
20 BOD 30.705 44.871 73 615 73 615 : They have a main cluster, and then a large amount of stragglers. 53rd in tribal ODA. They won't last long in the top 20.
These are all my outside opinions, and are by no means influenced by any particular tribal bias. Now please, discuss.
1 Axe! 39.426 74.069 96 772 96 772 : Spread out over roughly 2 Ks with some decent spacing, however I do see some pretty tight clusters. 96 members is a bit much. 7th for tribal ODA, and an average points per player. All-in-all has mass-recruit written all over it, but if they are farming well, then I think we could see them around for a bit longer than the usual mass-recruits.
2 iHate 38.379 73.245 96 763 96 763 : Clustered very heavily with 96 members. 8th for tribal ODA, with an average points per player. This tribe does not look very promising at all. Too clustered and they will end up suffocating themselves.
3 AnoNym 37.826 72.498 96 755 96 755 : This tribe has got me perplexed. They have 96 members which is a bit of a turn off, but their spacing throughout K 44 isn't completely horrible, and if they can manage to work out their farming areas, I could see them building a decently solid K. They are going to have to figure out a way to not suffocate their members on the inside. They have the #1 tribal ODA, and it looks like they have a couple solid players leading them (King Silva, first to 10K ODA). Their future could be promising.
4 MAGNUM 36.770 55.375 71 780 71 780 : Clustered almost as much as iHate. Their ranked 67th for tribal ODA. No exceptional players. This tribe won't last long.
5 =WAR= 35.687 68.983 95 726 95 726 : Still very clustered up. Tribal ODA ranked 6th. At 95 members they also have an academy with 98 members. That is not a good sign at all. Their #1 player though looks to be a solid player which leads me to think they may be hiding some more solid players in the line-up. We shall see with time.
6 Fools 35.492 54.936 81 678 81 678 : Pretty clustered up with 81 members. From what I understand, this is Grant's premade. That can have good or bad connotations. I see some notable players and at the same time I see alot of dead weight. My guess is bringing in turtling noobs to use as a blanket for the good players, and they will probably internal them or drop them off as time goes on and they solidify their core players. Show alot of potential, but at the same time their stability worries me.
7 ROFL 35.204 55.267 81 682 81 682 : Decent spacing, there are some players that are a bit spaced from the main area of the tribe. #3 in overall tribal ODA. There are some decent looking players, and could have a good go at dominating K 34 if they can fight off BRICK in the southeast corner.
8 Avenge 34.738 45.099 60 752 60 752 : At 60 members, they don't have the initial look of a mass-recruit tribe. However, I am wondering why almost a 3rd of their tribe is halfway across the world. That is a bit troubling. #4 tribal ODA. They have some solid players as well. They don't look half bad, but they need to figure out what they are going to do with those stragglers across the world.
9 BRICK 34.507 64.936 93 698 93 698 : 93 members, and an academy tribe with 75 members. Very clustered, and will likely have to fight ROFL in the near future (if they are still around). Not much to say for ODA, and doesn;t look like this tribe will last very long. Terrible tribe CoA as well.
10 GOLD 34.107 65.350 99 660 99 660 : 99 members all clustered up nice and tight. Only 1 player in the top 200. Tribal ODA is outside the top 20. This tribe won't last long.
11 SFU 33.441 62.332 94 663 94 663 : Another 90+ mass-recruit tribe. #10 tribal ODA. You know, I have started to notice that anytime
shows up in a tribe profile, it's probably pretty safe to assume that they are mass-recruiting. I don't see them lasting very long.
12 ClicK« 32.747 66.356 100 664 100 664 : We have our first 100 member tribe to analyze. To start off, 100 members...Fail. Almost completely clustered into 1 K. However, they do have a couple promising players. I see this tribe falling apart, but some of their members will make welcomed additions to some other tribes in that area.
13 VIP 32.562 57.494 87 661 87 661 : More clusters. A couple decent looking players. Outside the top 20 for tribal ODA. This tribe won't last long.
14 Hydra 32.553 63.655 93 684 93 684 : Pretty clustered into 1 K. Not very many promising looking players. 20th in tribal ODA. Unless there is no other competition in their area, I don't see them lasting long against a decent tribe.
15 WiFi 31.470 47.749 71 673 71 673 : Very clustered. Almost no stragglers. Outside the top 20 for tribal ODA. Directly in the center of the world. They will be gone within a few months.
16 L.O.C 31.105 58.150 95 612 95 612 : Clustered into 1 K. 19th tribal ODA. I don't see any players that I recognize. Looks like they will be fighting BOD soon. I don't seem lasting very long.
17 Exiled 30.854 56.181 95 591 95 591 : More clustering. Seems to be a recurring theme in the top 20 so far. Only a couple of tribes have shown promise in their clustering. This is not one of those promising tribes. #9 tribal ODA. Lowest points per player in the top 20. They won't last long with the likes of Fools, and iHate near them.
18 SWAT 30.562 49.163 83 592 83 592 : Clustered and #16 ODA. Not much to see in their member ranks. They won't make it long in the core. Second lowest points per player in the top 20.
19 Rabid 30.527 30.527 31 985 31 985 : Cluster? What Cluster? Very spread out and a lot of room for their members to farm. #2 ODA for the tribe and highest points per player in the top 20. They show more promise than any other tribe in the top 20, and that's with only 31 members. Some noticeable players. There are a good amount of players I can't tell who they are because of their alias. My only problem with this tribe is that some of their players are quite over-rated in my opinion. They have rushed up the ODA charts and padded their stats a bit, but that could mean that their troops are lacking at this point in the game. Could prove troublesome once nobles come out.
20 BOD 30.705 44.871 73 615 73 615 : They have a main cluster, and then a large amount of stragglers. 53rd in tribal ODA. They won't last long in the top 20.
These are all my outside opinions, and are by no means influenced by any particular tribal bias. Now please, discuss.
