Chaos, I agree with you that an opinion is, by nature, flawless. However, we need not confine this statement to a vacuum, for an opinion has a lack of objectivity wherever it is made.
Introspection: your opposition of any opinion expressed will neither weaken nor bolster the validity of said opinion; and, in fact, your dissent will be equally as flawless as the original opinion.
Instead, this thread can serve as a haven for opinions, as well as dissenting opinions and, more appropriately to the intent of the thread, arguments that attack the logic of the opinions and dissenting opinions presented. An argument can not be won through the endless exchange of differing opinions. However, one way it can be won is by exposing the logical fallacies of the opposing argument.
For instance:
1. Introspection, it is funny that you have elected yourself king of debates when you only want to debate ideas and opinions you are already opposed to.
2. Introspection, since, by nature, an opinion has no factual certainty, how can it be flawed? Furthermore, if an opinion could be flawed, how would it be defined clearly enough to label one to be hideously flawed?
One of the two is a valid argument. The other can be quelled by addressing its logical fallacy.