DeletedUser1082
Guest
It was merely an observation - I mean come on, we all have to admit it. :icon_wink:
It was merely an observation - I mean come on, we all have to admit it. :icon_wink:
Can someone answer for me:
1) I don't believe this started out as tribe-wide. I believe it was a one-on-one situation.
2) I also want to know if anyone else is aware that XiG began planning it as tribal wide action long before they declared war.
I don't honestly believe that FTR went after XiG as a tribe. I DO however know that since XiG just took top seat from FTR, this was inevitable. But I also know one other thing: what you take and can not keep, you never held to begin with.
Can someone answer for me:
1) I don't believe this started out as tribe-wide. I believe it was a one-on-one situation.
2) I also want to know if anyone else is aware that XiG began planning it as tribal wide action long before they declared war.
I don't honestly believe that FTR went after XiG as a tribe. I DO however know that since XiG just took top seat from FTR, this was inevitable. But I also know one other thing: what you take and can not keep, you never held to begin with.
ok, I think I need to say it again.
Asterios was not part of the nap...
1. Not quite however if you'd read anything to do with this war on any thread concerning it you'd have read that, that question has been gone over about 150 times.
2. Not exactly ground breaking news. A member of our tribe was being attacked. Negations were in progress. When they showed to be fruitless, contingency plans were created. They were however, not acted upon until war was officially declared.
Any more brain busters?
Please explain it again becuase it is hard for me to belive that we invited a player just to hold his village for another tribe.
But in this reply you are starting to change your story, now he didn't agree on it anymore, now he "acted" like he did agree. I wonder how long it will be untill you confess that the action taken by your tribe was with the goal in getting a war with XiG.
Wouldn't it have been better to ask 'em to boot him? Less chance of confusion then.
Well, when I say he acted like he did agree, I mean that it seems now that he led us to believe that he agreed but maybe was just preparing to get to war with FTR
Well, other tribes got rid of him, Xig decided to keep him knowing he would be attacked by FTR
No aggrement was made in hold Asterios outside the NAP. What you did would had been the same as if we was to declare that you was not part of the NAP and we did start taking yours villages but the rest of FTR was to stay out of that.
We don't act in this way and we don't attack NAP or allied without prior notice. But at least all other tribe can now see how little honour FTR has.
Rather be quiet. Dont make from yourself idiot, coz only idiot can try to compare Pikapat (long time duke in FTR) and Asterios (everybody knows description of this ....). Terrible post :icon_rolleyes:
I thank you for this reply.
At least one of the dukes in FTR confess that no aggrement was made to let FTR take out Asterios.
Now is my question to you, you must have been aware that we was going to retaliate when FTR without prior notice did break the NAP we had with your tribe when FTR started this? And how can you still say that your tribe didn't wanted war with XiG?
And to all other tribe that have alliance or NAP with FTR, you must now realize that you can not trust any aggrement that you have with a tribe that without any prior notice betray NAP with other tribes.
Rather be quiet. Dont make from yourself idiot, coz only idiot can try to compare Pikapat (long time duke in FTR) and Asterios (everybody knows description of this ....). Terrible post :icon_rolleyes:
[. . .] a player that it was obvious Ftr was going for [. . .]