I don't know if you're purposely trying to irk me, as it's not working, but I'd say good effort if you were.
Don't ruin my plans. I'm getting close.
If you would like to say it is technically off-topic for this thread. Why post all those stats to begin with that included plight.
You repeated this, Which in itself is C2 vs SF & Plight and then say I shouldnt include village gains for plight.
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 277
Side 2: 89
Difference: 188
Didn't I tell you to go back and read my edit? Didn't I? Or did you just ignore that too?
You can't tell me what to do. If I don't feel I get respect returned to me it slowly fades away until I return none.
I personally would say that war conquers are a good sign of a players conquering abilities but not a good strategy. Therefore whoever in either tribe has positive net gains then they are better player then their counterpart in conquering. I have 6 net gains.
Lets do another little analogy
I took 6 gross villages from Meatloafff,
In the same time he could of taken 20 barbs.
I have conquered 6-0 villages to him. By that statistic Im much better.
However he is twice the size of me. So really he is twice as good as me.
Now put that to the side.
During the time I took those 6 villages, meatloafff could of taken 20 barbs / internals (very very reasonable).
Since I took them villages Maybe 1-2 months ago lets assume all those villages are built to full capacity.
Essentially Meatloaff has gained an extra 14 villages then I have. -6 + 20 = 14. While I only have gained 6.
Now telling me that total villages is less important then war conquers is incorrect. Barbs are going to be around for a very very long time.