aurora nyte
Guest
Okay, so you're saying that Coffee is losing the war, but its alright to be down by 5 because you're focusing on points?
Great to know. Shall I fetch you a medal?
- Status
Great to know. Shall I fetch you a medal?
MarkHarrison
Contributing Poster
- Reaction score
- 7
Let's look at the last week. (All figures taken from TWstats at time of writing this post, so there may be lag, but equal lag for both sides.)
Nubs have concentrated on their conquers against Coffee, which is a valid thing to do in a war
Coffee have said that they are going for growth, and not particularly concentrating on Nubs, so I thought I'd have a look at the last week's results on that basis.
Nubs:
13th December: 42 villages, 94,147 points
20th December: 75 villages, 240,183 points
Change over week (absolute): 33 villages, 146036 points
Change over week (percent): 70% villages, 155% points [EDIT: fixed typo]
Coffee:
13th December: 60 villages, 120,450 points
20th December: 87 villages, 280,507 points
Change over week (absolute): 27 villages, 160057
Change over week (percent): 45% villages, 133% points
Summary:
- Both tribes impressive
- Coffee started bigger than Nubs
- In terms of number of villages, Nubs is growing much faster
- In terms of points, Nubs is growing faster [EDIT: updated in the light of the correct figures above]
It's looking at the moment that I'll lose my bet, since Coffee will "lose" the war, but overall Coffee may well come out ahead.
Last edited:
DeletedUser
Guest
Uhm, how has CoFfEe grown by 133% when NUBS have only grown by 55%, surely that's wrong?
Edit: Doing it the way you have, CoFfEe have grown by 132.8%, and NUBS have grown by 155.1%
Summary:
- Both tribes impressive
- Coffee started bigger than Nubs
- In terms of number of villages, NUBS is growing much faster
- In terms of points, NUBS is growing much faster.
So, it would appear CoFfEe's policy of not targetting us because it'll slow down their growth, and us targetting them is going to slow down ours is...well...wrong?
Edit: Doing it the way you have, CoFfEe have grown by 132.8%, and NUBS have grown by 155.1%
Summary:
- Both tribes impressive
- Coffee started bigger than Nubs
- In terms of number of villages, NUBS is growing much faster
- In terms of points, NUBS is growing much faster.
So, it would appear CoFfEe's policy of not targetting us because it'll slow down their growth, and us targetting them is going to slow down ours is...well...wrong?
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser
Guest
Did I say anything about focusing on points? No I didnt say anything about that they are growing getting new villages making more troops so when the time does come do expect them to be ready smartass.
He said my leader when he is not my leader since I quit and I let him know its as simple as that.
Guys are more arrogant then usual today.
MarkHarrison
Contributing Poster
- Reaction score
- 7
You are right. I'd made a typo when doing the figures, and then based my comments on the (by then wrong) figures.
Sorry.
Hard to say whether it's "wrong", because that would imply that another policy would have worked better.
Certainly true to say "Coffee's policy is, thus far, not working"
DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser
Guest
mmm nice this is the only post worth to read thanx for the stats :icon_biggrin:Let's look at the last week. (All figures taken from TWstats at time of writing this post, so there may be lag, but equal lag for both sides.)
Nubs have concentrated on their conquers against Coffee, which is a valid thing to do in a war
Coffee have said that they are going for growth, and not particularly concentrating on Nubs, so I thought I'd have a look at the last week's results on that basis.
Nubs:
13th December: 42 villages, 94,147 points
20th December: 75 villages, 240,183 points
Change over week (absolute): 33 villages, 146036 points
Change over week (percent): 70% villages, 155% points [EDIT: fixed typo]
Coffee:
13th December: 60 villages, 120,450 points
20th December: 87 villages, 280,507 points
Change over week (absolute): 27 villages, 160057
Change over week (percent): 45% villages, 133% points
Summary:
- Both tribes impressive
- Coffee started bigger than Nubs
- In terms of number of villages, Nubs is growing much faster
- In terms of points, Nubs is growing faster [EDIT: updated in the light of the correct figures above]
It's looking at the moment that I'll lose my bet, since Coffee will "lose" the war, but overall Coffee may well come out ahead.
AusKilla
Guest
[12/20/2009 6:28:36 PM] A69 Jorge Escalante/i haz yourz smex tape says: aye
[12/20/2009 6:28:41 PM] A69 Jorge Escalante/i haz yourz smex tape says: i haz yourz smex tape here
[12/20/2009 6:28:53 PM] A69 Jorge Escalante/i haz yourz smex tape sent file "lol pwned nubs.jpg"
[12/20/2009 6:28:59 PM] A69 Jorge Escalante/i haz yourz smex tape says: have fun mate
[12/20/2009 6:29:07 PM] A69 Jorge Escalante/i haz yourz smex tape says: Wars arnt won by dirty tricks,
[12/20/2009 6:29:12 PM] A69 Jorge Escalante/i haz yourz smex tape says: their won on the battlefield.
[12/20/2009 6:29:20 PM] Alex - World38 n00b says:
[12/20/2009 6:29:22 PM] A69 Jorge Escalante/i haz yourz smex tape says: i hate conor
[12/20/2009 6:29:25 PM] A69 Jorge Escalante/i haz yourz smex tape says: much more than u
[12/20/2009 6:29:34 PM] A69 Jorge Escalante/i haz yourz smex tape says: nubs have good players but leadership sucks
Yeah i'm pretty damn positive
Want an in game mail confirmation to?
DeletedUser
Guest
Let's look at the last week. (All figures taken from TWstats at time of writing this post, so there may be lag, but equal lag for both sides.)
Nubs have concentrated on their conquers against Coffee, which is a valid thing to do in a war
Coffee have said that they are going for growth, and not particularly concentrating on Nubs, so I thought I'd have a look at the last week's results on that basis.
Nubs:
13th December: 42 villages, 94,147 points
20th December: 75 villages, 240,183 points
Change over week (absolute): 33 villages, 146036 points
Change over week (percent): 70% villages, 155% points [EDIT: fixed typo]
Coffee:
13th December: 60 villages, 120,450 points
20th December: 87 villages, 280,507 points
Change over week (absolute): 27 villages, 160057
Change over week (percent): 45% villages, 133% points
Summary:
- Both tribes impressive
- Coffee started bigger than Nubs
- In terms of number of villages, Nubs is growing much faster
- In terms of points, Nubs is growing faster [EDIT: updated in the light of the correct figures above]
It's looking at the moment that I'll lose my bet, since Coffee will "lose" the war, but overall Coffee may well come out ahead.
Excellent post. Thanks for the stats. You're quickly becoming my favorite forum personality, perhaps because you're equally biased towards both sides.
robi zmaj
Guest
He is likeable
Matt.camb
Guest
Just to make a notion...
Looking at the survey results in this other thread, it will seem that Nubs have gained very strong public support and portrayed CoFfEe as the 'bad' guys. Well done to that TNC and Notoriety*! However, as GH posted in that thread, the results may be biased in the first few surveys, it will be interesting to see the next results.
Looking at the survey results in this other thread, it will seem that Nubs have gained very strong public support and portrayed CoFfEe as the 'bad' guys. Well done to that TNC and Notoriety*! However, as GH posted in that thread, the results may be biased in the first few surveys, it will be interesting to see the next results.
DeletedUser
Guest
This thread may now be closed as CoFfEe and NUBS have signed a renewed NAP.
The following were the final war statistics:
Side 1:
Tribes: CoFfEe
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: NUBS
Players:
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 0
Side 2: 5
Difference: 5
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 0
Side 2: 14,366
Difference: 14,366
(Not including the 2 that have been / are being taken from Garuda45 who was dismissed as part of the NAP agreements.)
The terms were agreed as follows:
Terms agreed by the leadership of both tribes - World38 n00b and Teh Nub Cookie.
In regards to Mark's bet, he did not mention in the terms of the bet what would happen in the case of a diplomatic agreement between the two - unlike how he said if either tribe disbands the agreement is null and void. Therefore, we view that the bet is still on and due to the fact that it is currently 5-0 (7-0 if you include Garuda..or soon to be) and that no attacks may be launched until the 24th...and his bet runs out on the 10th...it is clear that he lost the bet and we would like to congratulate the person who took him up on it.
- Conor
The following were the final war statistics:
Side 1:
Tribes: CoFfEe
Players:
Side 2:
Tribes: NUBS
Players:
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 0
Side 2: 5
Difference: 5
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 0
Side 2: 14,366
Difference: 14,366
(Not including the 2 that have been / are being taken from Garuda45 who was dismissed as part of the NAP agreements.)
The terms were agreed as follows:
Terms agreed by the leadership of both tribes - World38 n00b and Teh Nub Cookie.
In regards to Mark's bet, he did not mention in the terms of the bet what would happen in the case of a diplomatic agreement between the two - unlike how he said if either tribe disbands the agreement is null and void. Therefore, we view that the bet is still on and due to the fact that it is currently 5-0 (7-0 if you include Garuda..or soon to be) and that no attacks may be launched until the 24th...and his bet runs out on the 10th...it is clear that he lost the bet and we would like to congratulate the person who took him up on it.
- Conor
DeletedUser
Guest
Waiting for the next thread :lol: :icon_wink:
Rifky
Guest
ugh.. i think they should just continue here when the NAP is broke.. again...
DeletedUser
Guest
Yeah maybe 'they' should sticky this :lol:
DeletedUser
Guest
:icon_eek:
No attacks till after the 24th of January? Wow. That's pretty restraining guys :icon_neutral:
I hope you guys each know what you're doing considering that you'll be tightly cramped into little K44 for at least a month now. All I can say is I'm glad teh flame wars will be brought to a close.
I have to wonder though, who approached who about this NAP, and for what purpose? I can see how it benefits CoFfEe but can't fathom why a tribe that's up 7-0 on the other would accept an NAP that would last long enough for one of the best ODA tribes to rearm themselves and prepare for another go...
I guess there may be a reason, but I sure can't think of one.
No attacks till after the 24th of January? Wow. That's pretty restraining guys :icon_neutral:
I hope you guys each know what you're doing considering that you'll be tightly cramped into little K44 for at least a month now. All I can say is I'm glad teh flame wars will be brought to a close.
I have to wonder though, who approached who about this NAP, and for what purpose? I can see how it benefits CoFfEe but can't fathom why a tribe that's up 7-0 on the other would accept an NAP that would last long enough for one of the best ODA tribes to rearm themselves and prepare for another go...
I guess there may be a reason, but I sure can't think of one.
DeletedUser44836
Guest
well, Nap is created, i think thats enough of this discussion for now.
Closed.
Feel free to contact me if you think it should be re-opened.
Closed.
Feel free to contact me if you think it should be re-opened.
- Status
