Number of conquered villages in the last 7 days
Rank Tribe Conquered Villages
1 UN W40 326
2 iAlone 292
3 NMS 291
6 Kata 208
7 UN 40A 201
16 DeathX 114
18 UN 40N 107
Number of lost villages in the last 7 days
Rank Tribe Lost Villages
1 iAlone 158
2 UN W40 118
5 NMS 105
10 Kata 59
11 UN 40A 56
12 DeathX 53
Figures not available for UN 40N - 21 villages show as lost in this period, but doesn't show any villages lost through tribe changes.
Net gain/loss
UN W40 +208
UN 40A +145
UN 40N +86
(see note above)
Kata +149
DeathX +61
NMS +186
iAlone +134
(Note: internal nobling makes some of these stats a little misleading in terms of losses and gains, however neither UN W40 or Kata or associated tribes are in negative. From above its clear to see that the growth of UN W40 appears to be somewhat higher than NMS.)
NMS
22/03/2010 51,538,202 50 members - 1,030,764 points per player
15/03/2010 47,849,346 49 members - 976,517 points per player
3,688,856 point increase - 54,247 points per player increase
Tribe changes - 1 joined
(Stats for NMS from previous post for reference)
27th Feb 46,760,331 52 members - 899,237 points per player
20th Feb 46,807,681 58 members - 807,028 points per player
-47,350 point decrease - 92,209 points per player increase
Kata
22/03/2010 42,425,307 56 members - 757,594 points per player
15/03/2010 40,515,070 55 members - 736,637 points per player
1,910,237 point increase - 20,957 points per player increase
Tribe changes - 8 joined / 9 left
DeathX
22/03/2010 16,057,092 51 members - 314,844 points per player
15/03/2010 16,584,469 58 members - 285,939 points per player
- 527,377 point decrease - 28,905 points per player increase
Tribe changes - 8 joined / 11 left
UN W40
22/03/2010 39,320,982 53 members - 741,905 points per player
15/03/2010 36,487,355 51 members - 715,438 points per player
2,833,627 point increase - 26,467 point per player increase
Tribe changes - 8 joined / 6 left
UN 40A
22/03/2010 15,668,606 41 members - 382,161 points per player
15/03/2010 15,742,266 45 members - 349,828 points per player
- 73,660 point decrease - 32,333 points per player increase
Tribe changes - 4 joined / 7 left
UN 40N
22/03/2010 7,791,354 44 members - 177,076 points per player
15/03/2010 7,215,984 43 members - 167,813 points per player
575,370 point increase - 9,263 points per player increase
Tribe changes - 3 joined / 4 left
iAlone
22/03/2010 40,042,361 60 members - 667,372 points per player
15/03/2010 36,636,851 58 members - 631,669 points per player
3,405,510 points increase - 35,703 points per player increase
Tribe changes - 6 joined / 4 left
I think that makes the growth of the top four pretty clear, complete with those tribe changes. (I included Kata as the iAlone/Kata war may/may not be relevant to the progress of iAlone rather than because of any suggestion of hugging). Note the comparison of points increase per player for NMS is significantly less than it was for the week in Feb.
The iAlone/Kata stats here make for interesting reading. I might dig a bit deeper into that one if I get a minute. iAlone don't look to be doing too bad looking at these stats.
I see that you are not looking at the players being recruited. Each week, UN W40 is increasing in numbers, mostly along their rear flank. This is not to say you have not done well and are not growing, but that 700k per day is inflated. I can also assure you, we in NMS do not see this as ominous.
I will have my update done within the day.
I'd also argue that the majority of the UN W40/ Kata tribe changes were merely switches between tribes rather than active recruitment. I'd be interested if someone could do a breakdown on that, but I think its fairly irrelevant point to make. The recruitment of players along rear flank, seems pretty small fry when you start to look at figures for UN 40N and the size of their members.
