DeletedUser
Guest
Thread revive!
WOOTWOOT!
WOOTWOOT!
DeletedUser
Guest
Please discuss things.
From what i get from ur point is if a person who was using this strategy is rimmed it is not a good strategy. Everyone use normal nuke(axe/LC), most people are rimmed so if we apply ur logic axe/LC nuke is a bad strategy.
DeletedUser
Guest
Compared to someone using Axe/LC nukes, he had no offensive power and it was actually really easy to rim him compared to someone less active but using a normal strategy. He had almost no spears (from thinking that it was safe to just have offensive villages) and he was a poor player.
Personally, if youre going to cut your offensive power, go with Axe/HC nukes instead lol
DeletedUser
Guest
I hate tech 3 systems. It does seem to add a bit to the strategy though. If it comes down to it, I guess I'd do a sp/hc combo, but I really hate going all out and doing the axe/hc nukes. It weakens the nuke a lot. Training ram and cat at 1 and then removing them helps (As does having lvl 1 scout in off villages, but that sucks too), but juggling tech levels gets to be a huge hassle. Even with just a couple dozen villages. I can't imagine hundreds. :/
DeletedUser
Guest
But the strategic aspect of using HC axe nukes is more useful than just the nuking. For instance, with each of my nukes I can snipe a train, even if that train is landing before I could hypothetically get support to the village. Its really only useful for isolated defensive players, but when set up correctly you have 2 nukes to every d village, which gives you a bit more firepower to compensate for the lack of LC. Takes forever to make a nuke though.
Still, overall the sword nukes are a lot less effective as a defensive strategy than HC nukes.
Still, overall the sword nukes are a lot less effective as a defensive strategy than HC nukes.
DeletedUser
Guest
still u r not getting the point ur point is flawed. just leave that person alone. i do not know what he did and i do not know care who he was or if he had spear or not. If u have any strategic discussion i am more than welcome to discuss that.
These kind of comments are just noober than the player u guys rim.
DeletedUser
Guest
still u r not getting the point ur point is flawed. just leave that person alone. i do not know what he did and i do not know care who he was or if he had spear or not. If u have any strategic discussion i am more than welcome to discuss that.
These kind of comments are just noober than the player u guys rim.
It is a strategic discussion. If you use sword nukes and dont build defensive villages, you have no spears. Strategically, that leaves you vulnerable. If you arent going to even read what I said then please refrain from making comments about how "nooby" I am.
The strategic discussion was going forward. Notice;
That is strategic discussion, unless my eyes are reading the words "strategic aspect" incorrectly.
If you dont wish to have a discussion thats fine, but dont bother posting personal insults when I responded seriously to your initial question.
DeletedUser
Guest
this was ur first comment.
After mentioning that leave that noob alone and discuss strategy, u continued with him. this was ur second comment.
So the point is start all over again leaving that person alone. Just focusing on strategy. not a person failed with that strategy so it is a bad strategy. people fail with different strategies but it dos not mean a strategy is fail.
hope u understand.
After mentioning that leave that noob alone and discuss strategy, u continued with him. this was ur second comment.
So the point is start all over again leaving that person alone. Just focusing on strategy. not a person failed with that strategy so it is a bad strategy. people fail with different strategies but it dos not mean a strategy is fail.
hope u understand.
DeletedUser
Guest
What you arent understanding is that Im using him as a reference point. Im saying that the strategy he used, the first time Ive seen someone using sword nukes, didnt work. That is strategy discussion. Notice both of the posts mention strategy.
Again: with that player as a reference, the strategy is ineffective if you dont have spears backing up your nukes. It also makes defence slower than using HC. Strategically, speed is pretty important and the difference between swords and HC is huge.
Now, read what I just said before responding please. That is purely about strategy, but with evidence rather than hypothetical situations.
DeletedUser
Guest
Hc/Axe O & HC/Sp D
These 2 work together. HC due to its speed in support (You can stack a lot more HC then Sword - Making up for its weak attack skills)
LC/Sw O & ??? What is supposed to be its D? LC/sp?
Both are weak strats, but HC is actually usefull if your surrounded by multiple enemies.
These 2 work together. HC due to its speed in support (You can stack a lot more HC then Sword - Making up for its weak attack skills)
LC/Sw O & ??? What is supposed to be its D? LC/sp?
Both are weak strats, but HC is actually usefull if your surrounded by multiple enemies.
DeletedUser
Guest
I figure this:
Defensive Village:
11500 spears
1250 hc
200 cats
Offensive Village:
6000 axe
3000 lc
240 rams
Tech being spear 3, sword 1, axe 3, scout 1, lc, 3, hc 3, ram 2
11500 axe
1250 hc
240 rams
With a 2:1 ratio for offensive build.
2 axe+ lc for every 1 axe +hc
Defensive Village:
11500 spears
1250 hc
200 cats
Offensive Village:
6000 axe
3000 lc
240 rams
Tech being spear 3, sword 1, axe 3, scout 1, lc, 3, hc 3, ram 2
11500 axe
1250 hc
240 rams
With a 2:1 ratio for offensive build.
2 axe+ lc for every 1 axe +hc
DeletedUser
Guest
To uneven build times, your looking at more then double the time on Axes.
Making it pretty useless
Making it pretty useless
DeletedUser
Guest
You got a 16 tech system? :icon_redface:
DeletedUser
Guest
I meant ram to 1. whoopsies! :icon_redface:
Also henrik, the axe+hc build is the one suggested by openeye.
I don't really care if anyone does it, I just figure that not all your nukes will be axe + hc :icon_rolleyes:
DeletedUser
Guest
The idea of that strat is to have all villages in axe/hc & sp/Hc. It is to me Very useless. If i would to run it i would take more HC into the calculation and less axes. To me build times is more important.
If my enemy can produce more troops then me, ill be the loser in the end.
DeletedUser
Guest
this topic is so open for randomness that its pointless, theres no right or wrong answer. its down to the location of ur villas if they are secure or not etc. and how fast u build certain units and loadsa stuff. we'll end up giving opinions and various senarios, this cud go on forever.
pointless thread
pointless thread
DeletedUser
Guest
I say butter is too crunchy!
Pointless or no?
Pointless or no?
DeletedUser
Guest
well quite... stupid thread. no-one will adopt the opinions of another on this thread, and no-one is right. thats the beauty of TW.
its completely down to the individual, lots of examples, troop counts, building levels etc etc etc.....
if we all did the same, it wud be very boring indeed. so why "discuss" something that is only opinionated to an individual person.
i suggest its closed before we're in danger of loosing farming time by reading these pointless threads..
i know, ill start another one..
whats the best lots of axes, or lots of LC for an offensive villa.
well quite... no right answer.
stupid thread
its completely down to the individual, lots of examples, troop counts, building levels etc etc etc.....
if we all did the same, it wud be very boring indeed. so why "discuss" something that is only opinionated to an individual person.
i suggest its closed before we're in danger of loosing farming time by reading these pointless threads..
i know, ill start another one..
whats the best lots of axes, or lots of LC for an offensive villa.
well quite... no right answer.
stupid thread
DeletedUser
Guest
Your stupid.
DeletedUser
Guest
Henrik, I like this post :icon_wink:
The player who can produce troops faster will be the winner/larger account.
More Troops = more defense/offense
More Troops = more farming
Its that simple, then to get into different strats, well depending on your village build as to allow for troop numbers.
SW/LC shouldn't come into contention though.
AXE/LC or AXE/HC
With SP/HC or SP/SW
Don't limit yourself to having strictly all defense villages as SP/SW or SP/HC. Have a mixture of both.
Same goes for Offense strats
