Seriously? I find that sending fakes shows a level of determination and skill. For me this game is a about open warfare. Why should we have something that will handicap the attacker? Personally I believe that if you can't handle the heat you should get out of the kitchen. It's either that or get yourself a tiny rim tribe where you aren't expected to excel.
LOL, i didnt say it would, but a poll would be interesting.
And not so easy to predict - after all, if you can afford to buy pp, would you want to lose an advantage over n00bs who can't/won't buy pp?
Supposedly it's 1% of population in the village here.
I play on the Slovak world with a fake limit, where it's 1% of village points. It's basically 100 troops per fake. I voted yes for it because I'm sick of seeing players quit purely because they've got to spend too much time tagging attacks and not enough time actually playing the damn game. It would assist the defender in that attackers would have to think before they send fakes, so they actually look vaguely convincing.
I think the fake limit being enabled would have two effects:
a) We'd see a lot more offensive activity because players would be able to afford less defense - having less incoming attacks means less 'if' situations where they can utilise defense better. There's also more time available for sniping.
b) Usage of cats would escalate massively, as attacks are so easily tagged ram speed would be otherwise unconvincing and an obvious attack to dodge.
You make it seems as if its only an attacker's advantage.The problem is it's too unbalanced in favour of the attacker. It's not really determination when I can send 1,000 fakes in about 10 minutes. And I can keep that up for hours.
It's not really a gameplay advantage, it's a convenience advantage.
