DeletedUser
Guest
Ermm.. no, 16-18 sounds right :icon_rolleyes:Why don't we go with 13-18?
Ermm.. no, 16-18 sounds right :icon_rolleyes:Why don't we go with 13-18?
Double Check my original post, without editing it, I wrote 11-22 years old...
Ermm.. no, 16-18 sounds right :icon_rolleyes:
me eitherMake it 15-18, i'm not quite 16 yet
I think we should DOUBLE the price of packets. Make losing a noble mean something again.