So, you guys gonna fight or continue this boring banter?
It seems that Boo is come to your thread Ham.. do they got the juevos to come noble ya??
The topic was posted about HAM's success over CTRL. Discussion then developed revolving a light conflict between HAM and Boo, and Pajuno came in and told HAM and Boo! to stop discussing and to war. I disputed this by saying it's not the wisest thing to do because of location and other options, and said I would hope he never becomes my leader because of his outlook on these important characteristics of tribe development.
Where in my post did i say to stop discussing and go to war?? Putting words in my mouth can go a long way to making you look good in pnp. But if i didnt say it....
I asked a question, expecting a typical Bh answer, with positive, amusing forum banter.
Instead i get this:
Would you justify the subtle rambles of a single thread as reason for war?
I sure hope you never become my leader.
Now why would me asking a question deserve you to declare this statement?
Why wouldnt you use it as an excuse? you already got a 1 vs 1 out of it...
you got better things to do here than noble an enemy tribe?? A GOOD enemy tribe at that?
Statement of opinion:I would view their intrusion here as a challenge, and i would answer it. Im sorry that you dont feel the same way.
But i came here to kick ass. Maybe you prefer sim city or noob nobling??
Im glad your not in my tribe. I dont like it when players are reluctant to fight enemies...
As a side note, i am merely responding to your post> in no way, shape or form am i instigating.. Just thought that others came here for the same reasons i did...
Again, i
ASK questions. I know you not, nor have i heard of you> how can i find out about you if i dont ask??
And, so far in this banter, i have yet to hear your excuse of long range.
The problem is, you consider not warring, as "dancing", which is the point I'm trying to make. You'll only get as far as you can throw if you only focus on naive aggression, whereas you'll find out shooting with a cannon gets the ball much further if you think carefully about it instead of just going out and doing whatever.
based upon the convos, i feel its a safe assumption i can ask my initial question. Both sides have "danced" around the topic, and i believe one person from each side stepped forward and declared not worth the time atm> THEN there was continued banter.
Your assuming here what is my style exactly> but as you have based your opinion on four posts from me... where i have only stated i am here to kick ass. Nowhere have i stated how i will go about it. Nowhere i have i said these are the rules dictated inside my tribe.
You're deriving the topic from what it actually is; HAM's military efforts. I'm trying to debate with you an ideal method in which to run military, you're focused on next to nothing more than trying to flame me. That's like trying to prove gravity wrong by swinging a punch at someone's face. Ironically, soon enough you'll realize gravity's true when your momentum after the someone dodges causes you to crash to the ground.
Where did we discuss military tactics?/ (other than your mention of 50 hours distance rule) where did i state my tactics, tools, or methods. Again, Kicking ass can mean a lot of things to a lot of different people. I know some people find kicking ass to be nobling barbs.
I'm going to split this into misinterpreted jargon involving my psych, and what's continuable.
Here's a point, but I'll have to word it differently for it to be used properly.
"What I've done has worked so far, who's to say it's going to change."
And it's a valid point, but there's always a degree of chance involved, and to attack aggressively without alternative measure, like you're portraying(HOW) is what you do and aim to do, is to deny the chance and disregard the odd of failure, which is what I'm getting at; failure hurts more than success heals.
Hence fourth, attacking all out aggressively is nothing but skilled fluke after skilled fluke after skilled fluke if it's not backed up with backup plans such as diplomacy, alliances and so fourth.
There aren't many tribes around in the entirety of TW.net which have lasted the test of time following the "only aggression" policy you seem to be administering. If you try and name them, you'll learn that yourself.
That's why I'm saying I hope you're never my leader. Solely because of your only aggression policy you seem to be portraying with your posts, that in combination with your closed mind you have, not listening to a single thing I'm saying and simply continuing your own derailing methods, can lead to a failure that's impossible to recover from. It's only a matter of time.
Again, i bolded the key points here. Your assuming my methods again and again from a few posts.. where i questioned you on yoru opinion.
Do you go this far on everyone when they say stuff you dont like?? cause i believe that is all i did for you to try to teach me pnp. Next time you go trolling, try for someone that doesnt know what their doing. I have read your posts, i have just led you on enough to hang yourself.
you have portrayed nothing but your ignorance and passive aggressiveness in trolling your own threads. Anything i posted would get the same results, you are that intent on continuing this convo.
I have not put forth enough information for you to go all out and assume exactly how i lead. For someone to say im not listening, your reading awfully deep into nothing......
I disputed this by saying it's not the wisest thing to do because of location and other options, and said I would hope he never becomes my leader because of his outlook on these important characteristics of tribe development.
When did you mention this valid information?? AFTER you said you didnt want a leader?? Are you gonna configure the order of the conversation to suit your needs? Tsk tsk tsk.. .amateur pnp tactics.
Pajuno then disputed that by saying he didn't even check the map, and that facts weren't important in PnP, and persisted to label me as reluctant to fight enemies, a noob nobler, sim city player and blind to a challenge.
Again, i labeled and name called... in the form of a question?? Seriously, dont be so sensitive all the time.. I rather prefer Bh pnp, and that was who i was hoping would bite on my initial question. Sorry to disturb the Ham troll.....
Also, can you find where i said Facts
werent important in pnp?? I believe i said "you dont need facts in pnp" as in you can read the thread, get enough info, and
derive(proper use for once in this thread) a proper pnp response. I
NEVER said facts werent important.
Tsk tsk tsk... putting more words in my mouth. Such a weak pnp rep from Ham... specially when they got bh and calmir there.
Ps. just mentioning "my past", look me up, etc... you are using your past as a crutch>