No, it is not even close. At least when you guys argued you brought facts in to back up your arguements. All this guy does is take a couple of stats and state the same claim over and over without addressing how or why we got to that point. I am tired of hearing him say your ODD was lower than XYZ tribe so that must mean the world is inactive. So I guess the better tribes and tw players are the ones that scream for support and get their villages stacked when they come under attack. The top ODD players on this world were always our enemy because when we hit them we hit them hard. I remember it took us a long time to pass Oots in ODD after we defeated them. Even though we won that war Oots must have been the better tribe since they filled their villages up with support from inactives and other tribes. :lol:
Did I once say stocking was better than sniping? I don't think so. But if you were under real heavy attack where it is pretty much impossible to snipe, each noble assisted with a full offensive, 10 nukes hitting within 500ms of the last noble and supporting coming straight after the last noble you would be getting ODD or losing villages. I don't think DNY would ever have had to worry about that.
I am bringing stats and facts to this argument, there are about 5 or 6 other players arguing back and I haven't seen stats or facts coming from them. Just the same thing something along the lines of, we mass-nuked the enemy to make them quit rather than nobling them. I am then asking why your ODA was so low and I'm getting no response to that question. If your tactic is to mass-nuke the enemy and other tribes in other worlds have the tactic of nobling them, then why is their ODA much higher than yours?