Noobs O.O

[DeletedUser]

I didn't think there were noobs on .net server :/

 

[ALessonInPointWhoring]

I didn't think there were noobs on .net server :/

You didn't think there were noobs?

99% of the players on this world are noobs.

 

[DeletedUser]

You didn't think there were noobs?

99% of the players on this world are noobs.

Really?! I came in this server because on the italian server there were too many noobs and I think on .net there are more people that can play very well :/

 

[DeletedUser]

With lots of players come lots of noobs.

 

[ALessonInPointWhoring]

.net certainly has good players, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have bad players as well.

 

[DeletedUser]

Damn! I should go on the tribalwarsmaster to find only good players..

 

[DeletedUser]

There are noobs there as well

 

[DeletedUser]

WTF?! Noobs invaded TW

 

[DeletedUser108493]

You didn't think there were noobs?

99% of the players on this world are noobs.

That attitude... You belong to the 1%, right?

 

[ALessonInPointWhoring]

That attitude... You belong to the 1%, right?

1%?

Certainly, the top 1% isn't that high.

That's the top 160 or so players on this world (in skill, not necessarily ranking).

 

[DeletedUser57316]

That attitude... You belong to the 1%, right?

I guess you dont know who Nauz is xD

 

[DeletedUser108493]

I guess you dont know who Nauz is xD

I know him, but I don't consider him superior to me. We're are all equal.

 

[DeletedUser57316]

We are definitely not all equal

 

[DeletedUser]

Nauz is a legend ^_^

 

[ALessonInPointWhoring]

I won't claim to be the best player, but top 1% is certainly something I will claim.

I will even claim top 0.1%, and quite likely .01%

.01% would mean I am one of the two best players on W70 right now. That seems possible.

.1% would be one of the top 16, that much is fact as far as I am concerned.

 

[DeletedUser97716]

I won't claim to be the best player, but top 1% is certainly something I will claim.

I will even claim top 0.1%, and quite likely .01%

.01% would mean I am one of the two best players on W70 right now. That seems possible.

.1% would be one of the top 16, that much is fact as far as I am concerned.

Im curious as to who you believe may be better than you

 

[DeletedUser57316]

There are better all around players then nauz, since he prefers just to play start-up, but not too many can beat nauz at start-up, if any.

 

[ALessonInPointWhoring]

Im curious as to who you believe may be better than you

I don't believe there is '1' best player.

I think there may be best players at specific tasks though.

Lodda and Roberto would get my vote for best late-game players.

Lodda is the determining factor is who can most consistently get rank 1 on any world at late-game.

Roberto if we care more about % of war conquers, internals, etc. (He can't outgrow lodda, but he doesn't internal nearly as much as lodda)

As for startup, I'm not sure if I'd call any "better", except maybe Dent. There's a lot I'd class as roughly comparable though.

 

[DeletedUser]

I can't wait to confront aganist you!
It was a good idea to came here..

 

[DeletedUser108493]

I won't claim to be the best player, but top 1% is certainly something I will claim.

I will even claim top 0.1%, and quite likely .01%

.01% would mean I am one of the two best players on W70 right now. That seems possible.

.1% would be one of the top 16, that much is fact as far as I am concerned.

In any world, under any circuntances and settings...

Let's imagine you have 10 full vills, I have 5, and you want to take me.

You play alone, I play with a friend, also with 5 vills.

Do you wanna bet that you wouldn't take any village?