DeletedUser
Guest
how is it considered a war if we dont even try to attack back much?
I just expected you to rollover and die, which is what you're doing.
how is it considered a war if we dont even try to attack back much?
I just expected you to rollover and die, which is what you're doing.
When and IF Nubs goes to war.....
I will make the declaration, not a player from another tribe, ally or not, not a player from Nubs but, ME ... TheBrain*
:icon_wink:
You know... This being "Tribal Wars" and all, I think it's kinda understood that you're at war with everyone, unless otherwise specified. Do you attack the red dot or the redder dot? I always assumed the redder dots were just 'priority' targets.
If for some reason, the leader of a tribe doesn't want to be at war, but doesn't want to have formal relations with another tribe, that leader could just tell his members not to attack a certain group of red dots.
Honestly, after... what was that? 100 exchanged villages? We still aren't calling it a war, well... that's kinda semantic.
Instead of nukes, let's call them um... 'attacking devices' and instead of nobles we could call them 'crowney dudes.' and sniping could be 'strategic placement' and instead of 'war' let's all call it a 'skirmish'.
So Wtf? and nubs aren't at war, attacking eachother with nukes and nobles, trying to snipe trains. No no. They are in a skirmish, using their attacking devices and crowney dudes to optimum efficiency and strategically placing their troops for agressive crowney dude killage.
You know... This being "Tribal Wars" and all, I think it's kinda understood that you're at war with everyone, unless otherwise specified. Do you attack the red dot or the redder dot? I always assumed the redder dots were just 'priority' targets.
If for some reason, the leader of a tribe doesn't want to be at war, but doesn't want to have formal relations with another tribe, that leader could just tell his members not to attack a certain group of red dots.
Honestly, after... what was that? 100 exchanged villages? We still aren't calling it a war, well... that's kinda semantic.
Instead of nukes, let's call them um... 'attacking devices' and instead of nobles we could call them 'crowney dudes.' and sniping could be 'strategic placement' and instead of 'war' let's all call it a 'skirmish'.
So Wtf? and nubs aren't at war, attacking eachother with nukes and nobles, trying to snipe trains. No no. They are in a skirmish, using their attacking devices and crowney dudes to optimum efficiency and strategically placing their troops for agressive crowney dude killage.
lol, who said that this is a declaration? personally i dont care about war declarations, most of times a war starts without a declaration and nobody notices that it started.
if nobody wants to call this a "war", then those are stats of the "skirmish"... :icon_neutral:
how is it considered a war if we dont even try to attack back much?
You nobled people that quit so if you want to call that a war then have fun with that war. But when you want the stats to change then declare on us. Until then keep quiet.
Yes 17maverick is from a smaller tribe that is losing villages from wtf players :\it is interesting to see how some people desperatly want to push [O] and nubs to decleare war on wtf
i take this just as propaganda of other small tribes around that are losing villages from wtf players
Read the thread title.Its more then fair to put bLkm$$ and care! in the stats And for the heck of it, SK. Or do those villages dont count?
Tbh after I posted that I said to myself I cba to do this :\Na dont feel like PnPing.