DeletedUser
Guest
When I am at home, I will sit down and deconstruct every invalid point you have portrayed.
Also, this whole "common sense" argument is nullified, when is common sense common?
I like how you are still saying my points are invalid, yet you still have yet to demonstrate how they are with a real counter-example.
Maybe common sense seems uncommon to you? Just because you lack it and you surround yourself with people who lack it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist, nor does it mean using it as an argument is nullified.
I have admitted you nobled better villages than we did, the reason for that wasn't anything other than the fact your tribe doesn't have villages of that calibre, so naturally we would have to noble worse villages, that or wait for your tribe to build them up to the same point levels as us.
Thats pretty logical and straight forward.
Wrong, you stated that you were countering what we said, when in fact you weren't as we did not actually say the things you were attempting to counter. Or did you think I was going to let that drop?
Oh you mean that in-game banter we had where it took you approx 50 messages back and forth to realize I was playing you for the fool you are? Oh you mean that mail. I remember now. Yes this will go in the same manner, but only because you need to believe your lies and make others believe your tribe is doing better than it actually is.
Wrong again, it is that ingame mail that took me 50 mails to realize that you were a complete idiot and that you have put around yourself a shield of idiocy that is immune to logic?
Actually, in that mail you repeated yourself many times questions and attempted counter arguments that I had already addressed; A common tactic used by people who are backed into a corner and have no other way out other than playing stupid or acknowledging the opponent's point as superior to your own. You chose option number 1, and I have the feeling you are about to choose it again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems when people are incapable of making an argument with quality, they try to make one with quantity and you have just done so by double posting, and once again repeating things I've already addressed. Very well, allow me to repeat myself so you can actually remember it this time.
Oh and just a thought...
Your whole argument is your tribe is doing better than ours because you have nobled villages of greater points than us (even though accumulated points of all villages we have nobled off you is still higher than the accumulated points of all villages you have nobled off us), correct?
Incorrect. I already said that we are saying we are better or that we are winning - We simply said we took better villages. I said that in this post:
http://forum.tribalwars.net/showpost.php?p=3634722&postcount=239
So does that mean, in your eyes if Tribe A nobles 1 (one) 12k point village and Tribe B nobles 100 3k point villages that Tribe A is winning the war? Basically thats what you are saying in all of your posts by saying your tribe has nobled better villages.
See above?
Don't come on the forum saying outlandish remarks like "common sense" and "I have logic" if you are not willing to back them up with actual evidence.
I would imagine that things like common sense and logic seem outlandish to you. But if you actually read my post with some level of attention, you would see that have explained how I did back them up.
I can see you are a stubborn person who only thinks they are right, while I am flexible in my train of thought... as long as you can prove you argument to be substanciated.
Being flexible in a train of thought means you are inattentive; Which you have clearly shown by making points that I have already responded to previously. You make it sound like I've never admitted I was wrong? Yes, I have. However, I generally don't admit I am wrong when I actually right, like in this case. Hard to understand for your infantile skull? Too bad.
Last edited by a moderator: