[PMS] - Care x - Chaos vs C²

Status
Not open for further replies.

DeletedUser

Guest
alexhol said:
Just like to say, seen as though people have now started to get my back in this, look how many of my villages were actually internals. None. Yes, most were free, but all from different tribes or people who were in my tribe but not anymore. Therefore, yes, it is still helping the tribe grow.

but yes AQSoupie, I've already apologised to the people who I feel it necessary too.
Click to expand...
Just because you kicked them a few minutes before your nobles hit doesnt make them not internals
 

DeletedUser

Guest
alexhol said:
Thank you, someone who understands why what im doing is simple, easy and funny aswell (for me anyway :D).

1 v 1 right now, no one would match me. Even if i didnt know how to play this game, i could still win against all but maybe 3 or 4 players in this world. And thats because ive not had to work for any of my villages, so my troop count is crazy. Ive had no attacks, so i have alot of defense, and not had to attack anyone, so my nukes are almost ready to be launched when i start taking my villages by force.

But to all the players calling me a noob, im not going to reply to you, i will just leave you from now, because we will see who the noob is in game.
Click to expand...

Time will tell, there have been numerous other players on various worlds that have played a similar style (Xeristos w56). Thing is, whenever these players come up against any sort of stern test, they always go missing. You talk sense so that's why I believe that you can play despite what others think of you on the forums. (btw they are right about a lot of things). We'll see what you've got to offer to a competent tribe when the time arises. For the time being, just try to ignore most of what is said about you.
 

DeletedUser3266

Guest
I was obviously in C2 for a while and in some aspects I will take up for alexhol. He was a decent leader, certainly not the best but his 3-way co-played account was 'supportive' of other players. I think he is extremely young...I do not know for sure but I would guess around early teens based on actions and postings. He did 'sit' a lot of accounts and seemed to be rather involved.

I, among several others, were taken in by his apparent BS and tactics. Yes, he obviously 'got lucky' with his free villages and his stats certainly show he did not work for anything and thereby reduces many people's respect for him. One could claim he is not a good player or any number of things but I will say based on actions in C2 he was involved and seemed supportive. He is certainly not a top 20 player and does not have the skills to maintain a top 20 account when he has to start fighting for villages. Obviously he may continue to get lucky with free gifted villages but I agree with several others that have posted - once an op actually goes down on alexhol he will very likely run.

In my opinion this is what happened with C2 - alexhol was full of BS when he said he had spies everywhere. He was the type of leader that wanted to maintain majority control so he did not have an offensive coordinator in place until well after the war began. Since alexhol was always more concerned with points over anything else I think this was his plan from the very beginning. Many people lost all respect for him as a player when he did what he did and to be honest rightfully so. Rather than fight a fight and work together with allies he decided to run - just like he will do if anyone runs an op on him I am sure. As far as C2 being full of inactives - that is not completely true - he made it a point to remove people on a constant basis to keep the active in the tribe.

Based on everything I have seen alexhol is just your basic early teenager (or pre-teen) player that is scared of being attacked and will run rather than try to fight. Points are the most important thing to him and nothing else matters.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I don't think he's that young, but if he is then I have a lot of respect for his grammar skills.
 

DeletedUser67103

Guest
Cadence said:
I was obviously in C2 for a while and in some aspects I will take up for alexhol. He was a decent leader, certainly not the best but his 3-way co-played account was 'supportive' of other players. I think he is extremely young...I do not know for sure but I would guess around early teens based on actions and postings. He did 'sit' a lot of accounts and seemed to be rather involved.

I, among several others, were taken in by his apparent BS and tactics. Yes, he obviously 'got lucky' with his free villages and his stats certainly show he did not work for anything and thereby reduces many people's respect for him. One could claim he is not a good player or any number of things but I will say based on actions in C2 he was involved and seemed supportive. He is certainly not a top 20 player and does not have the skills to maintain a top 20 account when he has to start fighting for villages. Obviously he may continue to get lucky with free gifted villages but I agree with several others that have posted - once an op actually goes down on alexhol he will very likely run.

In my opinion this is what happened with C2 - alexhol was full of BS when he said he had spies everywhere. He was the type of leader that wanted to maintain majority control so he did not have an offensive coordinator in place until well after the war began. Since alexhol was always more concerned with points over anything else I think this was his plan from the very beginning. Many people lost all respect for him as a player when he did what he did and to be honest rightfully so. Rather than fight a fight and work together with allies he decided to run - just like he will do if anyone runs an op on him I am sure. As far as C2 being full of inactives - that is not completely true - he made it a point to remove people on a constant basis to keep the active in the tribe.

Based on everything I have seen alexhol is just your basic early teenager (or pre-teen) player that is scared of being attacked and will run rather than try to fight. Points are the most important thing to him and nothing else matters.
Click to expand...
Well Im not to too familiar with c2 or PMS,but I was looking to see a better fight not a disbanding so early,but hey what can ya say!
!BM!
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Shouldn't be too much of a surprise but ~DE~ disbanded.

Also, the warstats between iKill and PMS are interesting...
 

DeletedUser

Guest
iKill and [PMS] alone:

Side 1:
Tribes: iKill
Side 2:
Tribes: [PMS]

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 4
Side 2: 0
Difference: 4

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 18,271
Side 2: 0
Difference: 18,271

chart


iKill and [PMS] family:

Side 1:
Tribes: iKill
Side 2:
Tribes: [PMS], PMS.II, NEXT!

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 13
Side 2: 0
Difference: 13

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 57,096
Side 2: 0
Difference: 57,096

chart




Like I said, interesting. I never said anything about war :icon_neutral:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
Was all the same player i think. Virus. took them all from what ive heard...? It was because they were going to help us in the war but as they were about to get started we merged.

Also, im 15 and turn 16 in a few weeks, for those who wanted to know above :)
 

DeletedUser3266

Guest
alexhol said:
but as they were about to get started we merged.

Also, im 15 and turn 16 in a few weeks, for those who wanted to know above :)
Click to expand...


I guess some call it merging, others call it running - semantics some might say. lol

The age certainly explains things a lot better! It should would be nice to find some older, more mature players that do not run from things.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Yeah 3 of those were from me. Would have preferred them to stay with Cadence but that was not possible. I don't like people around me who my tribe has no affiliation with. Cadence I could accept as we are friends, PMS I could not.

We are not warring one another though. Things changed when C2 merged.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
hughfj08 said:
actually you did




I dunno about you, but where I'm from WARstats means there is a war
Click to expand...

I called them warstats because that's what they're called. Not because I thought there was an actual war going on. What else would you suggest I call them?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Age and experience levels have absoluty no correlation. I dont know how many 30 year old+ players ive rimmed.
Maturity and age do, but at the same time, judging someone of their age can be quite folly, and in all regard, if you are so quick to judge someone by their age you are no better then they are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser107349

Guest
Krazdone. said:
Age and experience levels have absoluty no correlation. I dont know how many 30 year old+ players ive rimmed.
Maturity and age do, but at the same time, judging someone of their age can be quite folly, and in all regard, if you are so quick to judge someone by their age you are no better then they are.
Click to expand...

Whilst I appreciate your understanding of stereotypes not always holding true, your statement is absolutely incorrect. There is a direct correlation between age and experience, its easy to work out logically. TW is 6 years old, meaning those not old enough to play when it started/ play and understand and hence learn from those experiences are disadvantaged. However that's not to say your age will make you inherentally bad, but it is a more likely occurrence. Younger players also more often than not lack maturity, meaning the way they conduct themselves (descion making, generally annoying, valuing of points instead of OD/troops).

"And judging someone by their age means you are no better than they are." - that statement in itself puts down and makes a judgement on someone for their age, suggesting that you will be no better than they are insinuates that they are worse?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top