DeletedUser
Guest
Lol, yay me!
The last one left fighting... kind of...
The last one left fighting... kind of...
I think we should give neley credit for all his 6 caps the past months, even if two of them were retakes and the remaining four probably were accidental cross nobelings while trying to flee to K16
Side 1:
Players: neley
Side 2:
Tribes: LIFE
Timeframe: Last 3 months
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 6
Side 2: 1,898
Difference: 1,892
![]()
Not impressive stats, but I think he is still ahead of some other players left, in terms of enemy caps
- that said, demolishing own villages, the occasional queuing of troops, two retakes and a few cross nobelings while going for barbs may technically not count as "fighting".
I think it would be called 'strategically retreating'. It was a tactic used by Russia quite successfully against Napoleon and Hitler when they invaded. The Russians scorched all their crops and just retreated, thus starving the advancing armies until they were in no state to fight.
Let us scratch the "strategically" and just call it retreatingIn contrast to real life wars, there are no supply lines and risk of starving to death while extending your territory and building armies
![]()
You don't "save" defense by losing your villages without a fight. In this game, troops are limited by your farm levels and your total farm levels are limited by your villages. Losing your villages and thus your "troops factories" is how you waste troops. Any village you give up without a fight is a new possible army to your enemy and a lost defensive troops factory for yourself.No, He knows he can't defend those villages, so instead of wasting defence trying, he's letting them go and moving back to a safer line that he can defend.
Losing 1898 villages and taking two back while getting rimmed is "strategy"? Doesn't look like it is a good strategy though, judging from where it has brought its supportersThats strategy, hence strategic retreat.
So he made a strategic retreat, and retreating = quitting. So he made a strategic quitting, but he is not quitting? I think your logic is a bit flawed. Retreat doesn't change its meaning just because you say it was a "fast retreat", "slow retreat", etc.Retreating is the same as quitting, and he's not quitting.
No, He knows he can't defend those villages, so instead of wasting defence trying, he's letting them go and moving back to a safer line that he can defend. Thats strategy, hence strategic retreat. Retreating is the same as quitting, and he's not quitting.