The Story behind PITA disbanding. Have some shame on yourself Shaggy

DeletedUser

Guest
Sorry, 'twas FiG.

Go ahead and pick at other small portions of my post, that's clearly what the intent of the post was :icon_rolleyes:.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Sorry, 'twas FiG.

Go ahead and pick at other small portions of my post, that's clearly what the intent of the post was :icon_rolleyes:.

doesn't change the fact that what you just previously said couldn't have been further from the truth, but oh well.. :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
What can we say; shaggy was the one who got himself implicated.

And as many people have said, it's not just a "GotRob is at fault" argument. It's also a "GotRob capitalized on this in a low fashion". If they were confident they could win, they'd have not taken the sits they were sent. But they did, didn't they? Strange. In the meantime, I'm told Jurasu has had a policy (I could be wrong) where if someone offers to spy for him, he sends them to GotRob's leadership.

Difference in honor I suppose.

really? maybe u should stop embarrasing your self with your inaccurate posts u6
and maybe will be better if u will see PITAs honour

let me show it to you again, and just 2 posts

Because you can't beat us directly. You stoop to such low levels shaggy. Shame on yourself. CHEATER

P.S: For outsiders, James ( the baron ) has been busy for a couple of days and got a new co who apparently is shaggy's partner. And Notanothernoob2 had Justin's emergency sit. So this new retard gave sit to gotrob and disbanded it. So since shaggy knows he cant beat us. He tried the most immoral of ways to win the war. Anyway we are back and you are soo dead.

what he wrote is an offence and has no real base, just his imagination and hatred

Bunnies can really fly, but choose not to, THE TRUTH

Notice that bolding something doesn't automatically make it true.

Arguing with GotRob on this is pointless. It's rather obvious in the mail what happened and that there was communication before. Honestly, I logged in pissed off, but I thought that this was likely the actions of a rogue player, or perhaps one GotRob player (first thing I saw was Eternal Lord had my sit). Ultimately though, I see that wasn't true, and I must say, I'm am very, very disappointed with GotRob's actions and am ashamed to have players stooping to such a low level in this game that I love.

You want to know the truth? PITA will come back from this. We aren't done. We won't lose. GotRob can't beat us, and GotRob knows it. I hope you guys have fun playing this world in vain, because we won't stop until we've won.

P.S. Funny. I see you've had one of your long term sits make a tribe and take the tag PITA. Real mature.


valid for Jurasu too and of course, allways valid for you, all your posts are picking Gotrob, me or shagy because of your failure to play on w 59 perhaps

anyway, its just Pitas fault for what happened, not ours or Gods
 

DeletedUser

Guest
doesn't change the fact that what you just previously said couldn't have been further from the truth, but oh well.. :)

You would've been nobled for being a barb-nobler when TKT and FiG did their whole thing. We didn't want to bring you over from TKT, I argued to bring you over.

And now you act in an immoral fashion. I see I was clearly wrong in trying to have you recruited.
 

DeletedUser84667

Guest
You would've been nobled for being a barb-nobler when TKT and FiG did their whole thing. We didn't want to bring you over from TKT, I argued to bring you over.

And now you act in an immoral fashion. I see I was clearly wrong in trying to have you recruited.

Pics, or it didn't happen.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
fig and tkt are long gone u6

we are in september 2012 btw

morning
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I <3 not reading geani's posts. It makes my life so much simpler. You guys should try it!

PITA is only down 200 villages from where it was before this whole episode. Doesn't look to have hurt PITA too much :icon_wink:.
 

DeletedUser84667

Guest
I did prove you wrong bro, by proving you have not proved yourself right.

Pow, right in the kisser.

Also 200 villages is a lot, consider the lead of this war was decided by only what, like 270 villages?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Something is not wrong solely because you deny explaining every single thing that points to GotRob condoning the action if not orchestrating it (which is also debatable), and say there is no proof.

The only proof would be to compare IPs and logins and to know all communications and things Shaggy did during that day.

Seeing as there's no way for that, we're left to argue whether or not it did occur. While explanations for what he said have not been forthcoming, plenty of "there's no proof" comments have been.

Kevin, surely you can come up with something better than "Give me proof bro". I'm disappointed.

The ~200 villages came from these people not rejoining:

1 from Lord Zepert (his only village)
56 from sinsey (inactive anyways, so the villages aren't being used anyways)
119 from donna.asmodel (inactive anyways, so the villages aren't being used anyways)

If the villages are not being used prior to the disbanding, and not being used after, then there is absolutely no difference in the war. So no, 200 villages is not a lot, when they have 0 effect on the war inside or outside of PITA.

We can't tell too well how big the difference was between PITA and GotRob because someone disbanded PITA. However, the stats I managed to find through conquers show 737 for PITA against ESL/GotRob/=GTC= and 408 conquers by ESL/GotRob/=GTC= against PITA. That's over 300 villages in the lead, not 200.

Well well, looks like Kevin doesn't actually know it all :icon_eek:.
 

Kinky n Tough

Member
Reaction score
4
The disbanding and rebirth of PITA seemed to be just what the tribe needed :)

So thank you very much James :icon_biggrin:
 

DeletedUser84667

Guest
Something is not wrong solely because you deny explaining every single thing that points to GotRob condoning the action if not orchestrating it (which is also debatable), and say there is no proof.

The only proof would be to compare IPs and logins and to know all communications and things Shaggy did during that day.

Seeing as there's no way for that, we're left to argue whether or not it did occur. While explanations for what he said have not been forthcoming, plenty of "there's no proof" comments have been.

Kevin, surely you can come up with something better than "Give me proof bro". I'm disappointed.

Reread my post and it's context you nublet. I was talking about you saving ET by begging them to save him. That can be proved via screen shots of your chats with those who you begged.

The ~200 villages came from these people not rejoining:

1 from Lord Zepert (his only village)
56 from sinsey (inactive anyways, so the villages aren't being used anyways)
119 from donna.asmodel (inactive anyways, so the villages aren't being used anyways)

If the villages are not being used prior to the disbanding, and not being used after, then there is absolutely no difference in the war. So no, 200 villages is not a lot, when they have 0 effect on the war inside or outside of PITA.

We can't tell too well how big the difference was between PITA and GotRob because someone disbanded PITA. However, the stats I managed to find through conquers show 737 for PITA against ESL/GotRob/=GTC= and 408 conquers by ESL/GotRob/=GTC= against PITA. That's over 300 villages in the lead, not 200.

Well well, looks like Kevin doesn't actually know it all :icon_eek:.

Actually, us people, in game :)icon_cool:), can view the stats in our war archive. Pita was up 281, which is by far close to my estimate than yours :icon_razz:.

You misunderstood the point of what I said. I was not talking about the villages specifically, as you implied, I was talking about just the pure amount of villages. 200 villages of 281 is 71%, which means that statistically speaking (since this game is a numbers driven game) 71% of the positive ground they had gained just got neutralized by what you and others are call "GotRob efforts".

Thanks for playing Or-el:icon_wink:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Reread my post and it's context you nublet. I was talking about you saving ET by begging them to save him. That can be proved via screen shots of your chats with those who you begged.

Note that I didn't quote you, and that I was attacking the general logic behind your post; not the specifics itself.

But sure, let me dig up the screenshots from my other computer whose hard drive crashed from last year; that's a good plan. Until then, no one believe me, because that would be blasphemous. Why would I bother mentioning it if it didn't happen, nub? Of all things to mention, you think I'd fabricate that?

You've yet to prove me wrong. Instead, you are asking for mails/screenshots from months ago. What's next, should I be asking you for screenshots of every one of PITA's conquers to prove that you're not lying about the lead? Perhaps I should ask you for screenshots that you didn't have a sitter when PITA nobled you out and you needed one at night?

Come on, go back a few months and get me your logins to prove to me that you didn't have a night sitter, otherwise I'll chalk the Victorious Unicorn account up to you being a terrible player.

Terrible, terrible logic.

Actually, us people, in game :)icon_cool:), can view the stats in our war archive. Pita was up 281, which is by far close to my estimate than yours :icon_razz:.

Closer to your estimate doesn't make your estimate right; you're still off, and therefore were still wrong, just as I was :icon_wink:.

You misunderstood the point of what I said. I was not talking about the villages specifically, as you implied, I was talking about just the pure amount of villages. 200 villages of 281 is 71%, which means that statistically speaking (since this game is a numbers driven game) 71% of the positive ground they had gained just got neutralized by what you and others are call "GotRob efforts".

They didn't lose any ground. The fact of the matter is, if the villages are or are not in PITA makes no difference, because they are not being used. Sure, if you want to look at some statistic and say they're down 200 villages, go for it. But is that a fair representation of accurate loss? Absolutely not. The loss in ground is not on the frontlines, none of the villages went to GotRob, and the villages might as well not have been there as been there anyways, so there was no loss.

Thanks for playing Or-el:icon_wink:

You just argued that inactive accounts are lost ground, when not being nobled by the enemy :icon_neutral:.

I'm starting to lose a lot of faith in you Kevin. Those 200 villages lost is not ground lost in the war and has 0 effect on the war, so I don't know why else you'd compare it to the lead of 281 villages PITA had on GotRob before this underhanded move, only to say that the villages are imaginary "lost ground".

But oh dear, you were closer in your estimate of the lead, suddenly you're all right and it's cool :icon_eek:.

Kevin, stay in 65 :icon_wink:.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Eugh. This isn't that big of a deal. Can we return to our regularly scheduled programming yet? Up next The Wiggles teach you how to tie your shoes!
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Account sitterStartEnd
Eternal Lordtoday at 19:23today at 19:29




Because you can't beat us directly. You stoop to such low levels shaggy. Shame on yourself. CHEATER

P.S: For outsiders, James ( the baron ) has been busy for a couple of days and got a new co who apparently is shaggy's partner. And Notanothernoob2 had Justin's emergency sit. So this new retard gave sit to gotrob and disbanded it. So since shaggy knows he cant beat us. He tried the most immoral of ways to win the war. Anyway we are back and you are soo dead.

If Pita has so high morale standards, I think would be fair if drunk penguin here will apologize to shagy and Gotrob, no?

Im very curious to see how hight standards they really have
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Geani and Kevin....


u6 thinks he makes good points and ppl care, but actually

9785527.jpg
 

DeletedUser

Guest
You would've been nobled for being a barb-nobler when TKT and FiG did their whole thing. We didn't want to bring you over from TKT, I argued to bring you over.

And now you act in an immoral fashion. I see I was clearly wrong in trying to have you recruited.

you really need to stop posting stuff that isn't exactly true.

i mean a appreciate if you helped me to get into fig back in the day because it was a great tribe and i really liked there (it's a shame i only got to be there for like a month before merging with shave took place). however i was no barb-nobler (yeah there were plenty around then that's for sure) and i was never in danger nor being massively attacked by anyone.

cheers :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Geani and Kevin....


u6 thinks he makes good points and ppl care, but actually

[spoil]
9785527.jpg
[/spoil]

You get things wrong and run off with your tail tucked between your legs; keep it that way. No one likes a bitter person who ends up wrong.

you really need to stop posting stuff that isn't exactly true.

i mean a appreciate if you helped me to get into fig back in the day because it was a great tribe and i really liked there (it's a shame i only got to be there for like a month before merging with shave took place). however i was no barb-nobler (yeah there were plenty around then that's for sure) and i was never in danger nor being massively attacked by anyone.

cheers :)

You were in danger, because the other tribes in the area wanted you gone. Do you not recall your position? I sure do. Up north next to other tribes and separated from the main of FiG, who protected you by name and diplomacy? Yeah, I remember. And you weren't a barb nobler? Let's see:

[spoil]ETERNAL (724|343) K37 3,017 Barbarian Eternal Lord [TKT] 2012-03-07 13:51:04
ETERNAL (718|325) K37 5,002 LeeroyBrownster [-34-] Eternal Lord [TKT] 2012-03-05 18:23:50
ETERNAL (738|329) K37 3,629 Joe--Lilley [SVG] Eternal Lord [TKT] 2012-03-03 00:30:29
ETERNAL (743|339) K37 2,278 Barbarian Eternal Lord [TKT] 2012-03-02 11:13:40
ETERNAL (748|334) K37 2,469 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-03-02 01:11:21
ETERNAL (726|348) K37 2,532 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-03-01 22:31:05
ETERNAL (722|324) K37 2,546 Burntrice Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-03-01 02:12:09
ETERNAL (726|343) K37 3,853 ironman219 [TKT] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-29 23:21:18
ETERNAL (761|332) K37 1,539 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-28 10:05:28
ETERNAL (762|332) K37 2,613 aruber Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-27 11:23:05
ETERNAL (721|326) K37 3,966 Brad3647 Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-27 02:20:42
ETERNAL (760|333) K37 5,608 aruber Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-24 20:52:52
ETERNAL (720|323) K37 7,376 Eternal Lord [What?] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-23 14:15:10
ETERNAL (720|323) K37 7,376 Burntrice [-34-] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-23 14:15:10
ETERNAL (722|326) K37 4,517 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-21 00:21:11
ETERNAL (738|322) K37 4,768 stylin joe Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-21 00:20:01
ETERNAL (713|333) K37 6,864 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-18 06:12:11
ETERNAL (725|346) K37 2,446 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-16 22:51:12
ETERNAL (741|324) K37 1,545 Vimpel [What?] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-15 12:07:16
ETERNAL (744|328) K37 3,745 dgrace3 [-34-] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-13 16:29:30
ETERNAL (723|348) K37 2,505 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-12 19:06:13
ETERNAL (752|331) K37 4,611 SmackNasty72 [-34-] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-09 20:15:47
ETERNAL (737|330) K37 4,674 buryman Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-09 06:06:39
ETERNAL (735|339) K37 4,093 buryman [-34-] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-02 17:49:08
ETERNAL (737|343) K37 5,081 wes130 Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-02 02:24:54
ETERNAL (742|334) K37 1,842 Tygon [PR] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-28 20:34:22
ETERNAL (750|331) K37 3,494 Solomon Brightwell [SFKB] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-27 16:18:28
ETERNAL (740|348) K37 1,424 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-23 14:26:49
ETERNAL (724|326) K37 904 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-21 19:37:18
ETERNAL (742|338) K37 1,822 arcangeli [BOSS] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-15 16:00:33
ETERNAL (743|338) K37 509 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-10 11:04:34[/spoil]

12 villages, most of them small barbs. How many total conquers did you have?

17 player conquers. Oh, and 1 internal separate from both.

That's in excess of 40% barb nobles, and FiG had a 0-barb-policy. But all this is besides the point; it's sad how far you've sunk when you see an enemy tribe disband but peek around the account anyways, and use information you find from a clearly dishonorable case of account loss.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
You get things wrong and run off with your tail tucked between your legs; keep it that way. No one likes a bitter person who ends up wrong.



You were in danger, because the other tribes in the area wanted you gone. Do you not recall your position? I sure do. Up north next to other tribes and separated from the main of FiG, who protected you by name and diplomacy? Yeah, I remember. And you weren't a barb nobler? Let's see:

[spoil]ETERNAL (724|343) K37 3,017 Barbarian Eternal Lord [TKT] 2012-03-07 13:51:04
ETERNAL (718|325) K37 5,002 LeeroyBrownster [-34-] Eternal Lord [TKT] 2012-03-05 18:23:50
ETERNAL (738|329) K37 3,629 Joe--Lilley [SVG] Eternal Lord [TKT] 2012-03-03 00:30:29
ETERNAL (743|339) K37 2,278 Barbarian Eternal Lord [TKT] 2012-03-02 11:13:40
ETERNAL (748|334) K37 2,469 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-03-02 01:11:21
ETERNAL (726|348) K37 2,532 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-03-01 22:31:05
ETERNAL (722|324) K37 2,546 Burntrice Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-03-01 02:12:09
ETERNAL (726|343) K37 3,853 ironman219 [TKT] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-29 23:21:18
ETERNAL (761|332) K37 1,539 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-28 10:05:28
ETERNAL (762|332) K37 2,613 aruber Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-27 11:23:05
ETERNAL (721|326) K37 3,966 Brad3647 Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-27 02:20:42
ETERNAL (760|333) K37 5,608 aruber Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-24 20:52:52
ETERNAL (720|323) K37 7,376 Eternal Lord [What?] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-23 14:15:10
ETERNAL (720|323) K37 7,376 Burntrice [-34-] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-23 14:15:10
ETERNAL (722|326) K37 4,517 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-21 00:21:11
ETERNAL (738|322) K37 4,768 stylin joe Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-21 00:20:01
ETERNAL (713|333) K37 6,864 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-18 06:12:11
ETERNAL (725|346) K37 2,446 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-16 22:51:12
ETERNAL (741|324) K37 1,545 Vimpel [What?] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-15 12:07:16
ETERNAL (744|328) K37 3,745 dgrace3 [-34-] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-13 16:29:30
ETERNAL (723|348) K37 2,505 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-12 19:06:13
ETERNAL (752|331) K37 4,611 SmackNasty72 [-34-] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-09 20:15:47
ETERNAL (737|330) K37 4,674 buryman Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-09 06:06:39
ETERNAL (735|339) K37 4,093 buryman [-34-] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-02 17:49:08
ETERNAL (737|343) K37 5,081 wes130 Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-02-02 02:24:54
ETERNAL (742|334) K37 1,842 Tygon [PR] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-28 20:34:22
ETERNAL (750|331) K37 3,494 Solomon Brightwell [SFKB] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-27 16:18:28
ETERNAL (740|348) K37 1,424 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-23 14:26:49
ETERNAL (724|326) K37 904 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-21 19:37:18
ETERNAL (742|338) K37 1,822 arcangeli [BOSS] Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-15 16:00:33
ETERNAL (743|338) K37 509 Barbarian Eternal Lord [What?] 2012-01-10 11:04:34[/spoil]

12 villages, most of them small barbs. How many total conquers did you have?

17 player conquers. Oh, and 1 internal separate from both.

That's in excess of 40% barb nobles, and FiG had a 0-barb-policy. But all this is besides the point; it's sad how far you've sunk when you see an enemy tribe disband but peek around the account anyways, and use information you find from a clearly dishonorable case of account loss.

i suggest you go check those stats again and use your brain this time mate :)

when i was in fig i nobled exactly 0 barbs.

barbs taken before i joined fig were either when i had just started this world and some later on just to have some more d in the area. never once did i just go ahead and noble barbs.

so, please, just stop defaming me, ok?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
We were discussing when FiG recruited you, not what you did after FiG. Why would we discuss the future that hasn't happened yet when discussing whether or not FiG should recruit you?

/facepalm

So you had just started the world and nobled more than 40% barbs, but you never once went ahead and nobled barbs? That's silly, and completely contradictory. But you're still missing the point.

Me said:
it's sad how far you've sunk when you see an enemy tribe disband but peek around the account anyways, and use information you find from a clearly dishonorable case of account loss.
 
Top