So what you are saying is that the other duke was aware of your concerns and that you acted in an appropriate way? oh hang on you didn't did you. You entered a tribe spent your whole tie in there being argumentative and unpleasant then moan when you get removed: Not the kind of player I like to associate my self with and I see leaving was the right option for me:
this sums it up "I told him various times before and after that that I thought he was incompetent" you were in the tribe a total of 3 days before this happened.........
I think the key pat in my response was "for starters"
I'll assume you know the fifference between not being brilliant and bad?
my future plans are for my eyes only,
Point conceded I can be pedantic too.
Not at all, I chose the areas I wished to discuss, just like you have not addressed the areas in my original post about mike's mysterious movement of accounts.
My loyalty (unlike yours) was to the tribe - not to any single person within it. Your loyalty was to Alex. That alone, in my opinion, makes me a more valuable asset to a tribe than you or Alex. Did I disagree with many of the things Alex did? Yes. Why? Because he was incompetent. Did anyone else agree? Yes, hence why he is no longer duke and I was given a leadership position.
Okay, please list everyone else you know who was internalled. If you can't, or refuse to do so, we'll continue to accept that this point has no basis.
Sigh. Logic clearly isn't your strong point. If you're writing a thread to counter the supposed 'brilliance' of Base, and you post examples to show that they're not as good as thought - what do you post? Yes, things that are meant to be bad. You do not post things that are good/great/brilliant. For someone to be lowered from a standard of "brilliant" to a lower level, they must have done some things that are "bad", hence the examples you listed. Logic. Try it.
Good for you in regards to your future plans. Simple fact remains though - you would not be "surrounded" by purple if you rejoined Base.
I am not and was not involved with Mike's movement of accounts. He can defend himself. We'll assume you have no evidence or counter to my point about Base's diplomacy then. Like pretty much everything else you have written - it's nothing but the ramblings of a bitter former member.
Again:
- Base internals a lot - 4.5% internals
- Base gets a lot of free villages - highest ODA per player (as far as I am aware)
- You'd be surrounded by NAPs - two to three players in your 20x20
Do you actually have any new points, or evidence to back up your current points, or are you just going to keep rewording them slightly in the hope that it might make your arguments slightly more credible?