The true calibre of a tribe

DeletedUser

Guest
cooler1968 said:
I made the posts BEFORE

are you that stupid?

ffs ... dont answer ... i know already!!!
Click to expand...

Tsk tsk, bad attitude. I have not bothered reading any of your rants up to now (except one of the very early ones). Simply because you're posts (while intellectual [mostly]) were just full of whining. I can only speculate over what the original reason for this was, hell, i could read into it and understand your angle better. But then I don't really care to know.

If you have to resort to insulting people, then you've clearly lost the argument.
 

DeletedUser102841

Guest
ah yes - every legit complaint is whining ... especially if its done by a smaller player. ahh - i get you now.
 

DeletedUser102841

Guest
Situation.Critical said:
If you have to resort to insulting people, then you've clearly lost the argument.
Click to expand...

and saying someone is whining, whinging, moaning or crying is not an insult to them, no?

actually, it is.

so, taking your logic you have lost the argument
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I believe this is turning into a bit of a straw man fallacy(humbletrees posts aside), i believe cooler has put forward a sound argument, good premise followed by a good claim, however, i don't believe this analogy stands when comparing real life to tribal wars, there's countries that would intervene in real life(not always so in TW), there could be groups like that in TW but most of the time it will be to get a piece of the pie(understandibly so), comparing real life politics to TW politics doesn't work(maybe if you kicked real life back to a point when politics weren't so prevalent).

Regarding your actual claim ("The true caliber of a tribe will always be measured on the quality of the fights they are involved in.") i don't believe this is true, you can in no way control the quality of your enemies, and if you could, why would you make them better? (if anything this skirmish might teach some of BFAM how to up their game and see where they went wrong for future worlds) Easy food is good food(imo), minimize your losses and save those troops for another day, all the while expanding your territory(good times for any tribe).


I think theres a ton of factors that go into a good tribe, regarding the quality of your opposition though, i don't believe so(that logic would make BFAM a super tribe), 4PLAY made a good choice, though i would have declared on a certain tribe before Ill did (but thats another story). In a nutshell, the world of TW isn't fair and its partly what makes the game interesting, anything can happen, even your own allies can turn on you, what to do about this? Suck it up, take notes on what went wrong and learn from it, take each wrasslin match as a way to hone your skills and don't grab your ankles at the first sign of destruction, even better if you are against the odds, challenge breeds excellence and will make you a better player, if BFAM had fought it out to the end then they would have gained some respect. Sorry for the long post
 

DeletedUser

Guest
cooler1968 said:
and saying someone is whining, whinging, moaning or crying is not an insult to them, no?

actually, it is.

so, taking your logic you have lost the argument
Click to expand...

I woudn't think so. I am just stating what I see in your posts. You however, continued on to call me stupid, whether lacking information or not. that sort of thing is just uncalled for

So just cool your jets...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser92095

Guest
@cooler
You aren't doing as well as any of the guys taking villages off you. (Your caps look terrible btw)

You probably lack the time and most probably the skills and the experience to defend your villages against attacks.

You're also pretty much convinced that you have no chance of beating djwright and the rest of 4play in-game.

No wonder you resort to bashing them in the forums. We get it now bro. Need a hug?
 

DeletedUser102841

Guest
carrot soup said:
@cooler
You aren't doing as well as any of the guys taking villages off you.
Click to expand...

Stating the obvious there arent you?


carrot soup said:
You probably lack the time and most probably the skills and the experience to defend your villages against attacks.
Click to expand...
time, yes - skills no ... defend my villas against a number of hostile attacks. ah yes - i suppose i should be able to defend against the might of 4play... :) joker

carrot soup said:
You're also pretty much convinced that you have no chance of beating djwright and the rest of 4play in-game.
Click to expand...
Absolutely - because I didnt attack them when i had the opportunity to do so - earlier in the game. why didnt i? because I agreed with their thoughts on twplayer. they said they wouldnt take anyone from train into their tribe so i had no option but to choose a different tribe ... and then guess what - they took ex-train people in ... another double standard and hypocritical move.


carrot soup said:
No wonder you resort to bashing them in the forums.?
Click to expand...
lol

carrot soup said:
We get it now bro.?
Click to expand...
eh - no you dont. each of your replies have shown quite clearly that you are incapable of "getting it"

carrot soup said:
Need a hug ?
Click to expand...
eh ... pass
 

DeletedUser102841

Guest
Situation.Critical said:
I woudn't think so. I am just stating what I see in your posts. You however, continued on to call me stupid, whether lacking information or not. that sort of thing is just uncalled for

So just cool your jets...
Click to expand...


and i am stating what i see in your posts. all square
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Big tribes take out smaller tribes so that they are not a nuisance later on in the world. They take the villages so that they can build their own troops for their own uses. They then use these villages against bigger tribes. That is why big tribes take out smaller tribes, they are a pest and it is easier to have the villages on your side then have to worry about them later on. This is expansion, let me give you an example, would you take the bigger player in your area first if he had the ability to stack his villages quickly and nuke you back, or would you go for the smaller player who has little ability to retaliate or stack, yes they both have to be taken out but you take out the one that will harm your growth less. Unless the bigger player is causing you issues or will cause you issues, you always go for the easier target. It is strategy, something which you evidently fail to recognise.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Cooler, you are right, you made some valid points at the start, but they were irrelevant, because this is tribal wars, not real life. Then you made yourself look silly by getting all angry when people tried to correct you. I'd like to leave you with some reading material. You should read it, take note and perhaps learn from it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
Agree with Leonidis212 about how this can make you a better player if you don't quit. Amazing how much you can learn, or put the guides to use, and quickly. Sniping, pre-nobling yourself, re-capping, the list goes on. I was having so much fun battling a guy 5 times my size on my 1st world. Have you ever enjoyed watching a player overnoble himself 3 times on your village and then re-taking it a minute later? When push comes to shove and you have little left, grasping with every troop unit you can, did you know that Scouts have some defense in them and can actually snipe a noble with a small escort? That was hilarious! It was like a dogfight! The best education in TW I could get and, in 1 instance, I was Invited to their tribe when it was all said and done. So, even if you lose it's worth the effort.

Comparing TW to RL is ridiculous. It's a game with no life altering, at least I hope not, consequences.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Vilja said:
Agree with Leonidis212 about how this can make you a better player if you don't quit. Amazing how much you can learn, or put the guides to use, and quickly. Sniping, pre-nobling yourself, re-capping, the list goes on. I was having so much fun battling a guy 5 times my size on my 1st world. Have you ever enjoyed watching a player overnoble himself 3 times on your village and then re-taking it a minute later? When push comes to shove and you have little left, grasping with every troop unit you can, did you know that Scouts have some defense in them and can actually snipe a noble with a small escort? That was hilarious! It was like a dogfight! The best education in TW I could get and, in 1 instance, I was Invited to their tribe when it was all said and done. So, even if you lose it's worth the effort.

Comparing TW to RL is ridiculous. It's a game with no life altering, at least I hope not, consequences.
Click to expand...

I totally agree. Defending in W44 against Ram was fun and eventually got me a invite. Best way to get better is by fighting
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I am a ex member of BFAM now fire, and cooler, what did you think would happen in this PnP, just everyone flames fire, why would this benefit us starting this?

The South east is 3 tribes, 4play, infamy and -fire- cant see who will lose here at all,

All im saying is -fire- surely knew what thye were doing recruitiung us, and you expect 4play peace?

Thats extremely naive from the leaders, and the author of this thread


~Jack

My two cents
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Damn it, ive just made a fool out of myself, sorry guys


*Ashamed face*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top