Deleted User - 4669627
Guest
:icon_redface:
i guess ~@~ can see i was not lying when i said the chief concern of the new recruits was not ~@~ :lol:
i guess ~@~ can see i was not lying when i said the chief concern of the new recruits was not ~@~ :lol:
chrissy24
Guest
you havent fought @ - you've fought me with the few active accounts you have - all of which dwarf mine. oh and a few inactive/dead accounts. well done to the "greatest tribe" ever
however you have recruited @ - so well done on that. built up your roster with some more active players - but sooner or later you will run out of players willing to run.
Deleted User - 4669627
Guest
ottello was active, he was duke, he was 1 million points, he started before any of my mates (except the 5 from k55), he quit the moment he logged on and saw incomings
http://www.twstats.com/en64/index.php?page=player&id=9740258&mode=history
rfph1 was duke before ottello, above 1 million points, he started before any of my mates (with the exception of the 5 from k55), he nobled the very day before we launched on him
http://www.twstats.com/en64/index.php?page=player&id=1996618&mode=history
redsuns, wildrider16, mattbarker91, MrDeathCookies, Night Wizard, TuCc, Ant11, Smokeybear, Ramster65, knine1230, Lubilander
all those players were nobling in the days before we hit them, some have even continued to noble after we hit them
with yourself included, that brings the total number of active accounts we have attacked to at least 15 from ~@~ alone, we're not even looking at ~@2~
there are 3 more that may have been inactive
we recruited 5 of your mates, and you have kicked a few and a few left of their own accord
now we have accounted for more than half your accounts, 15 + 3 + 5 + 6 = 29 accounts
obviously not all your accounts are in range of us atm, i am shocked we were able to hit 18 of you (15 of them active) in the first 2-3 weeks
now you say they are tiny? the vast majority are yes, how is that OUR fault? especially when many of them started before many of us.
you say they are barely active? the vast majority are yes, how is that OUR fault?
you say they are not putting up a counter-fight? the vast majority are not, again you are right, how is that OUR fault?
you say you alone are putting up a fight? you are about 75% right when you take into account the accounts you sat, how is that OUR fault?
remind me again why your mates who are leaving should have suicided for the sake of the 17 players we have hit that are not you?
chrissy24
Guest
otello was barely active - you knew that through your spies. he proclaimed it often enough on our forums.
you knew rf was being sat since having family problems (actually you hit him at exactly the right time for us- it was nearing the end of his allowed sitting time)
a member of your tribe sat boylupot for which he was temporarily dismissed until he (they/whoever plays that account now) convinced ottello it was all a mistake.
you knew the biggest accounts in the k76/65 were at the very least not going to support other members and as the above posts show were creeping up to you anyway. MEB,boy,skadida,-
likewise the k84 traitors- not one stick of support sent to our fronts.
the majority of us being cowards and self seeking bit part players in this world does not make you good (certainly not the greatest)- it says a lot about the players you now have and actually reflects badly on you.
but keep going - youre talking to a room of one who believes in you and your nonsense now.
you knew rf was being sat since having family problems (actually you hit him at exactly the right time for us- it was nearing the end of his allowed sitting time)
a member of your tribe sat boylupot for which he was temporarily dismissed until he (they/whoever plays that account now) convinced ottello it was all a mistake.
you knew the biggest accounts in the k76/65 were at the very least not going to support other members and as the above posts show were creeping up to you anyway. MEB,boy,skadida,-
likewise the k84 traitors- not one stick of support sent to our fronts.
the majority of us being cowards and self seeking bit part players in this world does not make you good (certainly not the greatest)- it says a lot about the players you now have and actually reflects badly on you.
but keep going - youre talking to a room of one who believes in you and your nonsense now.
Deleted User - 4669627
Guest
i had no idea how active ottello was except to look at twstats, i had no spies in ~@~ and i never ask anybody to spy. another tribe had a spy in ~@~ and offered me info that was relevant to and benefitted them
refer to my above reply
no idea about that, but ottello quit the day we ended diplomacy when i proceeded to lead the charge against not 1, but 2 of your top accounts, both actively nobling, both 1 million+ points, both bordering me, while i shared a border with Ex
i did not know ~@~ had big accounts in K76, refer to the above reply regarding k65, boy had a much smaller presence in k65, skadida is not in K76 or K65 and neither was MEB?
"traitors" :icon_rolleyes:, yet you say i am talking nonsense? :lol:
but since they left the tribe before any attacks were sent at ~@~ and they began attacking ~@~ themselves, why on earth would they support you? ODA gain? :icon_confused:
the majority of you being barely active and "cowards" (your word not mine) does not make us great, it just makes you food
it does not matter how well we do against food, conquering the ~@~ Family will never make us great cuz obviously it is not much of a fight.
what it says about the players i got from ~@~ is that i got the best cuz your best had the good sense to get away from being in a food tribe...
| skadida | Joined | 04th March 2013 - 22:03 | 1,299,392 |
|
| boylupot10 | Joined | 04th March 2013 - 22:03 | 1,752,815 |
|
| realbean2 | Joined | 15th February 2013 - 02:02 | 1,230,045 |
|
| =Bit Cloud= | Joined | 15th February 2013 - 02:02 | 1,636,980 |
|
| Dagorith | Joined | 15th February 2013 - 02:02 | 1,075,030 |
Side 1:
Tribes: ~MW~
Side 2:
Tribes: ~@~, ~@2~
Timeframe: 15/02/2013 00:00:00 to 06/03/2013 15:13:39
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 355
Side 2: 31
Difference: 324
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 3,193,700
Side 2: 278,455
Difference: 2,915,245
duh :icon_idea:
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser
Guest
Excuse me, we had a fair % of our D on the ex front before we made plans to join MW. In fact, compared to most players still in @, we sent a lot.
DeletedUser108123
Guest
Side 1:
Players: kojer
Side 2:
Tribes: Ex
Timeframe: Forever
Total conquers:
Side 1: 331
Side 2: 4,669
Difference: 4,338
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 52
Side 2: 7
Difference: 45
it is alot more then 52 if you include die4love and atterton.
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 2,965,658
Side 2: 40,277,192
Difference: 37,311,534
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 500,463
Side 2: 69,307
Difference: 431,156
Players: kojer
Side 2:
Tribes: Ex
Timeframe: Forever
Total conquers:
Side 1: 331
Side 2: 4,669
Difference: 4,338
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 52
Side 2: 7
Difference: 45
it is alot more then 52 if you include die4love and atterton.
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 2,965,658
Side 2: 40,277,192
Difference: 37,311,534
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 500,463
Side 2: 69,307
Difference: 431,156
