DeletedUser
Guest
Why would V not want to see them unlike you we are very aware of whats going on in our own war.
I think the war has take shift to a status where only the tribe sending nuke and noble willwin.What i see of V is they are having some problems with Ava quitting , wizzy going barb and some 3 or more big player inactive (including power who went in wuke).
Finaly have to give out XVI there well deserved pat on the back to closein the gap of caps in last months time frame however they need to improve in the Forever time Frame. So this is the Latest story madara and you know naruto manga has always twist and turns so always show the recent stats not the old stories
Really? Suddenly they're a decent tribe and they have PnP?
Look at some more stats before you post, please.
In case it skipped by you, [V] more-or-less IGNORED XVI for couple weeks to run some heavy internals and you still have almost no lead as a result. We didn't even run an OP ffs.
Good work?
33 vs 39 nobles is nothing to brag about. Previous weeks have shown XVI nobling MORE than that. All these stats show is that [V] has turned their attention away for a couple weeks, not that XVI is suddenly turning the tide. Purely the fact we can afford to do that is saddening.
What recent posters would like a cookie?
Really? Suddenly they're a decent tribe and they have PnP?
Look at some more stats before you post, please.
In case it skipped by you, [V] more-or-less IGNORED XVI for couple weeks to run some heavy internals and you still have almost no lead as a result. We didn't even run an OP ffs.
Good work?
33 vs 39 nobles is nothing to brag about.
Previous weeks have shown XVI nobling MORE than that. All these stats show is that [V] has turned their attention away for a couple weeks, not that XVI is suddenly turning the tide. Purely the fact we can afford to do that is saddening.
What recent posters would like a cookie?
Right. Pretty much exactly what I was saying. I said [V] are taking a period in which they aren't focusing on XVI due to internals. Is inactivity an issue? Sure, but its not the reason there are next to no conquers against XVI right now if we still have an 80% active member-base (I figure I'd better not leave out the obvious this time).I did. [V] is winning long-term, but it seems they've taken a month-long or more break from attacking back:
.Strange, that [V] would have so much internalling to do. If you look at the stats for total conquers, you'll see that [V] has over 20 more members than XVI. And yet, [V] is only nobling 100 villages more per week than XVI
.16 of [V]'s 65 members have registered no growth or losses in points for every single one of the past 7 days. By contrast, XVI has only 2 of 41 members in the same situation.
That is taking out of consideration the fact that no tribe doesn't go without lost villages, and rate of loss as not increased overly recently.even if they are keeping focus off XVI, that doesn't explain (as bluedragon mentioned) why [V] can't seem to defend.
I wouldn't know. Do you mean you're going to merge and play tribal-hugs? I left the world after a week of warfare in which I was positive on ennoblements vs V-V-V in a continent 2-3 ks deep into V-V-V territory as a result of oh, thats right, another merge of theirs. Would I have survived? Probably not, but mate, if XVI puts out what V-V-V did against me, I'm not concerned.This is starting to look more and more like V-V-V, isn't it n3m? Sounds all too familiar
Its hard not to be hostile towards somebody who hasn't even paused to register what you're RESPONDING TO before flaming, but I'll give it a go.
u6s5l, if you had actually taken the time to register that I was responding to PREVIOUS posts (and the PREVIOUS statistics they were based on) it would have saved me some time having to clarify. Let me do so: I was responding to comments made on previous statistics. I was in disbelief over those particular comments. They were not made based on your current stats. I think I've repeated myself enough.
But fine, lets argue your stats.
Right. Pretty much exactly what I was saying. I said [V] are taking a period in which they aren't focusing on XVI due to internals. Is inactivity an issue? Sure, but its not the reason there are next to no conquers against XVI right now if we still have an 80% active member-base (I figure I'd better not leave out the obvious this time).
.
+
.
Take a moment. 26 additional members -16 inactive. +10 active members. +100 conquers. So [V] have +100 conquers and +10 members. Not exactly horrid mate.
What point are you trying to make here? You've literally bashed [V] for something and then provided the statistics for me to point out your bashing was ungrounded.
Lets sum up the situation in regards to [V] as we both seem to agree on:
1) [V] have inactives.
2) [V] are internalling.
3) [V] aren't focusing on XVI (currently).
4) [V] have AROUND the same number of active players as XVI, according to your stats.
5) [V] are nobling AROUND the same number of vills per member as XVI, according to your stats.
Lets sum up the situation in regards to XVI (based on your stats):
1) XVI have nobled 78 vills in a week. Going back through pages I see noble rates from XVI against [V] have been similar in the past, and never so low as to have 78 vills in one week be a huge success.
2) Considering the above, XVI haven't looked to be performing drastically better offensively this past week than they have the entire war.
Now, considering your comment on drastic inactivity in [V], it surprises me you need somebody to answer this question for you:
That is taking out of consideration the fact that no tribe doesn't go without lost villages, and rate of loss as not increased overly recently.
Your Summary: All this has proven is that the tides are very surely turning against [V]
My Summary:
-XVI is still progressing at a slightly better rate than they were previously in terms of conquers against the other side - slightly, not drastically.
-[V] still has an active member-base of around the same size as XVI's, who are nobling at around the same rate, elsewhere
-[V] have yet to refocus on XVI.
and...
THE WHOLE POINT OF MY PREVIOUS SODDING POST: It is currently a one-sided war effort. I can't believe some of you are going on about these stats. What did you think was going to happen when [V] focused exclusively on internals? XVI would gift them vills so they could stay ahead on stats?
I wouldn't know. Do you mean you're going to merge and play tribal-hugs? I left the world after a week of warfare in which I was positive on ennoblements vs V-V-V in a continent 2-3 ks deep into V-V-V territory as a result of oh, thats right, another merge of theirs. Would I have survived? Probably not, but mate, if XVI puts out what V-V-V did against me, I'm not concerned.