gamaleden
Guest
as long as the premium cost too expensive i will keep leaving the worlds one after another after playing for three years
Are you guys still discussing this
I really feel sorry for the people having a hard time with the price increase. But honestly, you also need to start understanding how things work in the real world.
I know right? Why do these people keep posing feedback in the feedback section? Perhaps you should go over to whatever country it is that these posters are from and just sort it all out. By god man.. show them the way to capitalism, hook them up with some student loans and scholarships along with a country with a solid economy. Then they'll be firmly rooted in the real world too and you won't be bothered by their pesky posts anymore.
Was this actually an attempt to make him look dumb? You missed the mark Daz, your rant was just pointless and sarcastic.
You clearly missed what he was saying.
Actually if anything it would be making him look insensitive. And I'm not sure there's anything I could post on top of his post to do that. You're right, it was a sarcastic post, you get a gold star for getting 1 of 10 observations correct. And never tell someone they missed their mark with a post when you don't even get the basics of what they are saying..
No, I got it. He was saying if you are hurting for money and can't afford prem with the change you are screwed and should shut up about it. If they can't afford to play anymore and will be quitting soon, I believe they should have the chance to speak out.
You seem to be in the same boat as him. Seems rather rude and cheap to take shots at people whom by your own admission already have big problems.. very unclassy. Then again.. some people need to kick others when they are down, they are just not equipped to kick anyone else.
I'll spell it out a little easier for you. I think it has nothing to do with whether or not they can afford it, they just don't want to pay more money. Thats all it is. Reasonable?
I think you're missing the point. I could care less about any of that, I just think the players have the right to speak w/o some jerry springer wannabe flaming them.
I think their actual means, situations, and everything else is subjective and neither you nor I have the means to verify any of it. To even try to go down that road is pointless unless you are a drama seeker.
So you're saying that Innogames doesn't have the right to charge what they want for the services that they provide, and that you have the right to get whatever you want for whatever you want to pay for it?you are dictating to people what they should do with their money/lives, and that is just plain nasty. What you say is, in effect, the poorer ones don't have a RIGHT to play. If they can't afford it then they shouldn't be playing? Or should be working at Maccas? I'm sorry but we're talking about human beings, not statistics. Do you seriously believe that if someone happens to have a worse financial situation than yours has less rights to entertainment? I think keeping some games cheap and available to everyone is actually quite a valid argument. Maybe if people in our world shared things rather than just trying to get more for themselves we wouldn't have this situation and everyone would be able to have their choice of entertainment. But no, you think it's better just to go and work for some multinational that screws people in other countries, as well as underpaying and screwing western employees, to make sure YOU have what you want. Oh yeah, that's a good solution. Never mind about the people who live where the beef, wheat, etc are raised - screw them, they shouldn't even WANT to play, right?
you are dictating to people what they should do with their money/lives, and that is just plain nasty. What you say is, in effect, the poorer ones don't have a RIGHT to play. If they can't afford it then they shouldn't be playing? Or should be working at Maccas? I'm sorry but we're talking about human beings, not statistics. Do you seriously believe that if someone happens to have a worse financial situation than yours has less rights to entertainment? I think keeping some games cheap and available to everyone is actually quite a valid argument. Maybe if people in our world shared things rather than just trying to get more for themselves we wouldn't have this situation and everyone would be able to have their choice of entertainment. But no, you think it's better just to go and work for some multinational that screws people in other countries, as well as underpaying and screwing western employees, to make sure YOU have what you want. Oh yeah, that's a good solution. Never mind about the people who live where the beef, wheat, etc are raised - screw them, they shouldn't even WANT to play, right?
You should know its time to stop talking when you resort to this. None of what I said was drama-seeking or anything resembling the behavior of Jerry Springer. Jerry Springer facilitates arguments, he doesn't participate. Nice try though
as I have said, it has never been put to trial in a proper sense.
It is very convenient to be able to use a building overview, especially in conjunction with villages that need to be built having been grouped. None of that can be done without premium. The only option you would have without premium is to name the villages a certain way to be able to recognise them without clicking on every one, and then the enemy can work your system out too. And in any case building is the least of it because normally the majority of your villages will be built, only new villages or villages under attack have to be built (and there as I said it's very nice to be able to scroll down a building overview to see where the walls are low or whatever). Your problems are troop building which is constant, (well if you use the account properly which I guess you won't without premium), attack labelling and coin minting. Even sending attacks is annoying without premium because you have to open every village to see what troops it has. If you have ever tried to keep up on coin minting without premium with several hundred villages you would know that it takes more time than a desk job lol
probably the thing I find the worst about this price increase is that people who have been playing for years suddenly can't afford to or can no longer justify the cost.
If a price increases from $4 to $6 dollars, that is half as much again - and that is just rude. It's not acceptable anywhere -
you are dictating to people what they should do with their money/lives, and that is just plain nasty. What you say is, in effect, the poorer ones don't have a RIGHT to play. If they can't afford it then they shouldn't be playing? Or should be working at Maccas? I'm sorry but we're talking about human beings, not statistics. Do you seriously believe that if someone happens to have a worse financial situation than yours has less rights to entertainment? I think keeping some games cheap and available to everyone is actually quite a valid argument. Maybe if people in our world shared things rather than just trying to get more for themselves we wouldn't have this situation and everyone would be able to have their choice of entertainment. But no, you think it's better just to go and work for some multinational that screws people in other countries, as well as underpaying and screwing western employees, to make sure YOU have what you want. Oh yeah, that's a good solution. Never mind about the people who live where the beef, wheat, etc are raised - screw them, they shouldn't even WANT to play, right?