DeletedUser
Guest
Or could it just be that world 30 is actually world gangbang RAM?
Pay attention to the world chump.
Or could it just be that world 30 is actually world gangbang RAM?
hmmm. I wonder ... What is GetRammed's opinion for all this stuff ?? :icon_rolleyes:
aubree said:This person "disgruntled" or "spy" (same in my book) is classless and thinks hes has RAM by the balls, well imma tell HIM/IT to go ahead and massage them real quick while we stick something in his mouth! Mmmmm taste good?
Pay attention to the world chump.
I agree with my co-player.
Since Shipley is not around,
Are there not 6-7 tribes attacking RAM atm?
I expected a more ... thorough response from you. You are my primary suspect for all this you should know :icon_razz:
It can still be Shipley. Or Shirley. I'm careful about saying his name too much. Like Cy said, the more you talk about him, the more likely he is to return. :icon_wink:Not ... Shipley anymore for you? You hugged? Followed tribal policy through? :lol:
Not too many anymore. :lol:Nah. There are still some in the top 20 list, your leadership have not provoked/declared upon, all these weeks at the pnp... So it is not the RAM vs W30. Yet :icon_rolleyes:
The information provided is harmless. I'd only be concerned if the RAM member was giving away trade secrets like operation plans etc. Even those dont matter much because any operations planned should be done via IGM and should pack enough punch that the target isnt in much of a position to do much about it to begin with.
Nah. There are still some in the top 20 list, your leadership have not provoked/declared upon, all these weeks at the pnp... So it is not the RAM vs W30. Yet :icon_rolleyes:
What does that even mean? Are there not 6-7 tribes attacking RAM atm?
Is that not a gang-bang? Or is it because a woman spoke of a gang-bang that you're confused? :lol:
I disagree. Giving a tribe a poor public image reduces recruitment and diplomatic options. More however, is the problem that the general member of RAM seeing this may be alluded to think that RAM's leadership is poor and feeble (which is not the case), thus decreasing tribe moral and loyalty. Seemingly small things can lead to large problems.
Btw, asalamalakum, did you really have to quote the entire post just to say you liked it? If everyone did that these pages would be way longer than they need to be and that uses up more server space for storage - a cost ultimately passed on to us the customer. So would you mind awfully avoiding quoting entire monologues if you ain't picking them apart?
Using gang-banging as an excuse, and this is exactly what Aubree was doing, is absolutely ridiculous when it is simply RAM actions that have caused them to be at war with this many tribes.
If we had all got together and decided we would declare on RAM, then maybe a case could be made, this is not what happened.
I don't find it embarrassing at all. Of course, RAM haters would post it that way but its just common argument due to misunderstanding. Nothing so fancy about it at all. The only fancy thing was the one who posted it. And yes, you do curse at your friend. I have tons of logs of Paj cursing in every line he speaks. Everyone curses, not a big deal. Yes, it sure is fun to read, and again, thanks for the epic post. :icon_razz:
Any post from the tribe being made in public is considered spying. He who can post in PnP can also mail info to our enemies and thus is a spy. It is not due to disgust. Mind you, both of them has made up and having little arguments are always common in such a big tribe. This doesn't mean that we can't co-operate at all. Sorry to say hun, but your assumptions and conclusions to this issue are blurred.
As an excuse? You do you even understand the context the point was in? What is she using the gang-bang comment as an excuse from?
It's a fact that RAM is being gang-banged. Has our behavior caused some/most of the conflicts to happen, yes. No one's arguing that point, well, atleast I'm not.
Or could it just be that world 30 is actually world gangbang RAM? So when the "problems"of RAM are put out into the pnp every1 and their father feel the need jump in to get there licks.
Case for what? Multiple tribes vs. RAM= gang-bang. Are you actually arguing this? :icon_rolleyes:
No, we are not gang-banging you, that would imply collusion. RAM has simply opened war on many fronts, this is certainly not what entails a gang-bang. If we had all decided to go to war with RAM together, or were actively working together now, sure it would be a gang-bang, but we are not.
Yes, your post are always truly epic. You are not the tribe. Post your view, I stand by mine. Not more than 5 members will have been ashamed by this. And yes, we're different from the tribe you were from. And anger fuels our strength. Mberns and laura might be lovey dovy by now. And mind you, it is just 2 people have a little argument and yes, we love curse words
who are you IG? and why do you insalt you own tribe and leadership? i get saying somethings arnt right, but saying things like this should be left to the ignornce of flammers and paj:\....
Lmawii.
And somethings, like such is, must and require to be told. Or forever be suppressed and more destruction ensued. Thus, only increasing the problem as is.
This is one method of forcing a cooperative change. I'am not bashing my tribe, I'am criticizing it. Regardless of what happens though(good, bad, or indifferent), my loyalty remains to RAM. After all, winning the DECIDE war is what they got me for. :icon_wink:. I don't particular have any desire of backing out on that request.