I am trying to figure out how this map is any proof of betraying alliances? That map simply shows the areas each tribe will be working, if either tribe has diplomacy within those areas it makes no difference. The purpose of that map is to give a basic border agreement to where each tribe can and cannot recruit/noble into.
I have been reading this thread and there is no "intent" on breaking anything, at least not from RIM!'s point of view.
Yet there is so much to be decided between now and then. Any end game pacts I have still could include other alliances.
No those were rednecks words
I'm not quite sure we're looking at the same thread. :icon_confused:
I presented information, and said what it looked like to me, and that is an exact quote I said it looked like to me they would have to betray allies to keep this alliance true. Which is clearly my interpretation, and clearly stated as such. If someone else wants to interpret it different by all means they can I placed the information out there for them to draw their own conclusions.
Red mentions multiple times that it's entirely possible diplomacy with other tribe's still exist at that point. This is why I have formed the opinion that it's a "
stay out of my way, I'll stay out of yours" pact, as opposed to a "
you noble the entire north, we'll noble the entire south, and then we'll fight" pact. Again, that points to the fact that no alliances/diplomacy need to be "betrayed".
I'm not saying you can't have an opinion. I'm just saying you can't base it on things that people haven't said. You have just put words into Rednecks mouth as I pointed out above. Forming an opinion on that basis is not really contributing anything to the conversation. I think it's fine that you interpret the situation as you described, but you simply can't say that Rednecks described it as such.
:icon_redface: check some of those tribe changes, im sure you will see a funny thing happening, i dont care what you say about tribe changes, go hug coming and kill the world, cos thats all that matters. Lets hug it to the end. I do note you dont put COMINGs tribe changes there. Lets see the comparison between the top 3
Also, how many merges you had to rogues?
Zero...
I looked at your tribe changes. I saw a couple cases of players leaving and rejoining, usually indicative of temper tantrums or the occasional accidental "leave tribe" click. I also saw a group of Happle players join together. I saw lots of inactives being dismissed, and several players being rimmed and dismissed. So I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to point out other than your poor recruitment standards?
You're right, I didn't put COMING on there. Go look at your post that I commented on. It was a criticism of Rednecks, who is in RIM! not COMING. Had you accused COMING of merging, I wouldn't be defending them. You can go ahead and add to your counter another time where I need to tell you "Read before posting". You're doing a wonderful job of making yourself look stupid
Since you've already proved to be incapable of reading back a couple posts, Here is your post so you can review it before attempting another post for me to rip apart.
[spoil]
lmao, yeah I am sure tribe will want to send nukes and nobles across the world to ensure this doesn't happen. The way other tribes are recruiting and merging we may not be in the 1 & 2 spot for very long.
The only way to keep up with your merges is by the same route, which again makes this world, a merge war.
You so called elite players are turning the world in to a noob world. There is more competion in w52 then there is in this world due to certain tribes killing it.
[/spoil]
