DeletedUser122055
Guest
How to resolve ( N.B. resolve, not win!) an argument:
If your goal is to resolve a conflict, then to “win” might mean you “lose":
If your goal is to resolve a conflict, then to “win” might mean you “lose":
- Know your facts.
- Be ready to see the other person's perspective.
- If you can't be open-minded, at least seem that way.
- Keep your emotions under control.
- Remain hopeful that the argument can be resolved.
- Respect your opponent.
Now, if we analyse what TQL F. leaders have said in this thread so far, it's quite obvious they have 0/6. Which is really sad.
Lads, it doesn't matter how loud you get, it doesn't matter how passionately you defend your stance, it doesn't matter how many words you type in a post, it doesn't matter how many tribemates like your post here, you have been presented with solid facts and solid facts only, proving beyond any reasonable doubt that TQL was dishonest from day one, plotting their way to endgame. In return, all we got were insults, name calling, poor PR spin attempts and anger. So, I'd like to ask you to read my first post once again before continuing any further.
Stefan already replied to this. Some jokes are not in good taste, yes, however, that's how we at BM roll. We come from various backgrounds and we're proud of our diversity. That being said, none of us minds some old school poking. I'm pretty sure our muslim brothers don't need guala guala defending their religious freedoms, thankyouverymuch.
Hey Bill, scroll to the top of the post, check points 4, 5 and 6.
Also, make sure to check the screenshots from that secret chat you were a part of, it might refresh your memory.
TQL did playground diplomacy, plain and simple. Messaging tribes about alliances, friendships, war plans and whatnot. Only problem is, actions speak MUCH louder than words. And so far we've seen nothing but dishonesty. That is ofc, under presumption you can actually make allies by sending 3 messages promising a win.
12.06.2018.
-Aifrem (G) is getting an insane amount of support from BRO, a tribe he's simultaneously plotting to backstabb with the actual enemy. There is no way you can wash your hands from this. Evidence is clear.
-Allies until something better comes up. This pretty much sums up both G's and Jasper's vision of diplomacy. How else to explain their reasoning behind all this?
So, TQL allies BM to fight Riot. They know our stance. And all of a sudden they want a merge and they're surprised whey we say no? Solution to this problem? We are going to ally the enemy and rim/force BM to renegotiate under our terms. Please, somebody explain to me what kind of alliance would that be?
You're either with us or against us.
Tough mentally?Yes we are.
So obsessed with beast. pt.1
So obsessed with beast. pt. 2
Hot Eagle's response to the merger idea. Our stance was pretty clear. Thanks to our loyal allies, enemy knew it too.
Which doesn't really come as a surprise since G was Riot's biggest fanboy. Just to remind everyone, in case you forgot, G was at that time A DUKE of the coalitions biggest tribe/family. I'm sure his members would have appreciated this.
Loyalty. pt 1
loyalty pt. 2
Yes G, you sure are.
These screenshots pretty much show G's primary concern isn't loyalty as such, but a public image. Loyalty is just good PR. So. loyal ally until a better chance arises. In that case, he would have no issues:
backing out from a war to have his allies defeated so that he can proceed plotting world domination.
leaving a tribe temporarily just so he doesn't get blamed for backstabbing.
As long as there is no bad PR it's fair game. I must say, I find all this very amusing, evidence is clear and in copious amounts and I don't see how any serious tribe knowing all this would chose him or his tribe as allies. On this world or the next one
P.S. Now, my set of values might be a bit off, but:
-posting in a forum shared with entire tql f, about your little skype chat and asking you to step down is hardly plotting.
-talking to bill(or was it ngblazer?) about you making so many mistakes, and offering my opinion you should step down can hardly be considered as plotting. But hey, you do you.
Last edited:
