~300~ vs Gravel

[DeletedUser71060]

dont want to disappoint any one but scion wont beat us even with all the help they are getting seems every tribe wants a piece of us its good to be popular
we will be working our way down to scion and through them

 

[DeletedUser105935]

asta he is a very good player he has taken plenty off the enrmy and kept em so i have resect we are begining to close that cluster of gravel and then we will mop them up out of this world then it will be scions tern.

 

[DeletedUser108935]

Think the world will have ended by the time you do that

Deemster

 

[DeletedUser]

Why does anyone even care? TCRT, SPAM, and Calm. PISSED are the only tribes that matter.

 

[DeletedUser]

Why does anyone even care? TCRT, SPAM, and Calm. PISSED are the only tribes that matter.

Why not? It's a bit of fun. Winning is often a lot more boring than losing, that I have found over years of being on losing sides in TW. Pretty much all of worlds I have played, I would rather have been in a losing tribe with better attitudes and more fun than the winning tribe. The exception of course is W60 because SPAM is my baby . People let winning get to their head and use it as an excuse to patronise.

 

[DeletedUser]

asta he is a very good player he has taken plenty off the enrmy and kept em so i have resect we are begining to close that cluster of gravel and then we will mop them up out of this world then it will be scions tern.

Was directed to the tribe as a whole.

 

[DeletedUser80610]

Maybe if it has a tactical usage, but when you just aren't capable of doing anything else...

I feel as though you meant this as an insult - through my laughter I cannot see how.
Pretty much every tribe nobles barbs within their continents. I would go get stats but it's not a point worth proving. Your same theory on barbs could be said about 9k ones. They aren't strategic barbs to noble so why get them.

Winning is often a lot more boring than losing, that I have found over years of being on losing sides in TW.

I've never been in a winning tribe. I was in a losing tribe in W21. We ate barbs to stay alive. Not very stratifying but I got 11th ODD by worlds end. Heh.

 

[ashoka1]

nobling barbs is not bad...if you do it in backline to make D..

or

noble some in enemy area for death stars...

only 9 k barbs should be nobled on frontlines...coz

they don't take time to make a village full f troops

if you don't noble them enemy will and in ten days attack you with the troops of that barbs..

a 9k barbs doesn't need the resources and effort it takes to develop a 3 k barb.

 

[DeletedUser105935]

Well I totally agree although sometimes its all you can do.

 

[DeletedUser71060]

Why does anyone even care? TCRT, SPAM, and Calm. PISSED are the only tribes that matter.

very narrow minded
and its not about winning its the fun factor yes some see winning as there goal but me its having fun i was on the loosing side on w20 as that was what i choose i annoyed the best players in the top tribe and had fun doing so and ill do the same on this world
if sparta are not of any importance why is it so many tribes want a piece of us :lol:

 

[DeletedUser105935]

And we are winning don't forget were a young tribe still finding out who's the better players

 

[DeletedUser91224]

asta he is a very good player he has taken plenty off the enrmy and kept em so i have resect we are begining to close that cluster of gravel and then we will mop them up out of this world then it will be scions tern.

That was a good chuckle.

 

[DeletedUser105935]

Lol I find everthin you say funny glad you had a good laughth

 

[DeletedUser]

Why does anyone even care? TCRT, SPAM, and Calm. PISSED are the only tribes that matter.

Why are u even reading this then? There is other stuff going on in the world you know

Or we could all just have a grand old time talking about a "war" that is as one sided as it gets

 

[DeletedUser]

asta he is a very good player he has taken plenty off the enrmy and kept em .

This is a joke right?

 

[DeletedUser105935]

No

 

[DeletedUser]

No

He has taken like 5 TCR villages.

 

[DeletedUser105935]

shows how much you know were not at war with tcr.

Anyway just over 1 mounth knowso stat update.

Side 1:
Tribes: ~300~
Side 2:
Tribes: Gavel

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers:

Side 1: 1,578
Side 2: 704
Difference: 874

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 405
Side 2: 260
Difference: 145

Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 9,393,826
Side 2: 4,859,839
Difference: 4,533,987

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 3,443,116
Side 2: 2,325,408
Difference: 1,117,708

/

Side 1:
Tribes: ~300~
Side 2:
Tribes: -*S*-, Gavel

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers:

Side 1: 1,577
Side 2: 1,991
Difference: 414

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 429
Side 2: 364
Difference: 65

Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 9,390,719
Side 2: 13,235,207
Difference: 3,844,488

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 3,652,774
Side 2: 3,149,389
Difference: 503,385

 

[DeletedUser91224]

Side 1:
Tribes: -*S*-
Side 2:
Tribes: ~300~

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers:

Side 1: 1,288
Side 2: 1,577
Difference: 289

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 104
Side 2: 24
Difference: 80

Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 8,384,967
Side 2: 9,384,246
Difference: 999,279

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 823,981
Side 2: 209,658
Difference: 614,323

And thats just 4 players in the north...

 

[DeletedUser91224]

Side 1:
Players: landonashlea, churchill48018, Scots Hammer, dascoop, lostangel22
Side 2:
Tribes: ~300~

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers:

Side 1: 372
Side 2: 1,576
Difference: 1,204

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 87
Side 2: 17
Difference: 70

Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 2,253,443
Side 2: 9,381,231
Difference: 7,127,788

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 688,544
Side 2: 143,372
Difference: 545,172

:/