ashoka1
Guest
So merge is using chums and puppies ..
As many of you are well aware, relations between GLOW and ~P~/~N~ are becoming increasingly fragile. However, the sequence of events leading to the fragile state seems to be in question. My intent with this post is to clarify the current situation, and air out past transgressions and possible future solutions. It may be that I'm entirely at fault for this ordeal, but I don't believe that to be the case. Since their leadership is talking in circles (one says something while another does something else), I'll let you guys offer advice/wisdom/whatever else you may have to add on the topic....
So either fight them or dont post about it here.... at the end of the day does anyone really care? Now if you were taking a principled approached and went to war, I could see the play to rally support in the public forums - in fact, I have a lot of respect for a man of principle....but as of right now it just looks like you are whining more than anything. Just get it over with. Nut up or shut up.....this is a Realist world, there is no such thing as justice. You have to serve it yourself.
So (1) either fight them or dont post about it here.... at the end of the day does anyone really care? (2) Now if you were taking a principled approached and went to war, I could see the play to rally support in the public forums - in fact, I have a lot of respect for a man of principle....but (3)as of right now it just looks like you are whining more than anything. Just get it over with. (4) Nut up or shut up.....this is a Realist world, there is no such thing as justice. You have to serve it yourself.
[/Spoil]4.......
Realism maintains that universal moral principles cannot be applied to the actions of states in their abstract universal formulation, but that they must be filtered through the concrete circumstances of time and place. The individual may say for himself: "Fiat justitia, pereat mundus (Let justice be done, even if the world perish)," but the state has no right to say so in the name of those who are in its care. Both individual and state must judge political action by universal moral principles, such as that of liberty. Yet while the individual has a moral right to sacrifice himself in defense of such a moral principle, the state has no right to let its moral disapprobation of the infringement of liberty get in the way of successful political action, itself inspired by the moral principle of national survival. There can be no political morality without prudence; that is, without consideration of the political consequences of seemingly moral action. Realism, then, considers prudence-the weighing of the consequences of alternative political actions-to be the supreme virtue in politics. Ethics in the abstract judges action by its conformity with the moral law; political ethics judges action by its political consequences. Classical and medieval philosophy knew this, and so did Lincoln when he said:
I do the very best I know how, the very best I can, and I mean to keep doing so until the end. If the end brings me out all right, what is said against me won't amount to anything. If the end brings me out wrong, ten angels swearing I was right would make no difference.
I m not in glow you nub
Looks like merge using thier chums for pnp and then flaming glow.
Wouldnt be surprised if the first post was written after having consultation with merge.
One was kicked because he believes launching 12 hours away for the tribe is a waste, so a useless waste of an account and the other is an unstable former co-player who hijacked an account he didnt build, good finds there.Don't mind that we recently took on two of their players
Huskers is my friend. No sucking up needed. And I don't see anything incorrect, it's fine.
Looks like merge using thier chums for pnp and then flaming glow.
Wouldnt be surprised if the first post was written after having consultation with merge.
To an outsider atleast seems that way.
Are we gonna see the same old approach of using other tribes to weaken enemy tribes or merge has the guts to fight a tribe half its size without using help from its chums and puppies
But of course everything that happens in w67 only happens after consulting me:icon_rolleyes: Didn't you all the memo.. Are you at all serious? How did this become about merge
Personally I liked the thread and Glow's response, but brining my tribe into this is just stupid leave the topic about Glow and P for Christs sake.
(1)Personally I liked the thread and Glow's response, but brining my tribe into this is just stupid leave the topic about Glow and P for Christs sake.
(2) One was kicked because he believes launching 12 hours away for the tribe is a waste, so a useless waste of an account and the other is an unstable former co-player who hijacked an account he didnt build, good finds there.
To an outsider it seemed that way.
And I m an outsider.
you really are disrupting something good bye bye.
To an outsider it seemed that way.
And I m an outsider.
Are you the only duke of merge.
Or only you are authorized to speak on behalf of merge and your co leader is dummy
You r praised by all ...but mate its a team game ..too much of me and I isnt good.
Edit : read your edited post.thanks for clarifying.May be tribes involved knew but we outsiders thought otherwise.
Now we nubs know its all about glow and p
And merge wont get involved from either side
2. Guess it's lucky we are closer to Clinthorn. We've already seen him send support. Pocket Aces seems to be working well for what our council decided to do when we took him on board. As you probably know, I was very against his joining our tribe, but so far it hasn't had a terrible result.
– I was not aware; thank you for the enlightenment :icon_surprised:“As many of you are well aware, relations between GLOW and ~P~/~N~ are becoming increasingly fragile.”
- Kind of touchy group. I’d say for leadership of a Top Ten tribe, that is a rash response to a mail… unless you are genuinely afraid folks will actually leave. And even with that, too emotional a response IMO. :icon_neutral:“Huskerst0rm Mar 12,2013 16:09
I view solicitation of responses, especially when you haven't asked tribe leadership for permission as an act of war.”
- Making a lot of assumptions… are you psychic? Looks like a member was unhappy, left. And your response looks like a break-up with your high school sweet-heart... strange. Stalk much? :icon_rolleyes:“As you can see, the warning/advice was given and accepted. The only reason a member in his location would leave our tribe is because he wants villages that are in our tribe. I've seen it occur many other times. He has no other incentive to leave.”
- If a player has played alongside someone for 8 weeks, do you expect them to turn their backs on a dime?... of course he wants more folks he has played with around him. Though by your words alone, looks like that is what you are doing to Dude(?) though. :icon_idea:“After this, I was notified that Dude was messaging members and attempting to get them to flip. Quite the sneaky tactic. It's clear what the intentions are, but GLOW prefers to play it dumb--something that doesn't work on me.”
- Do you feel this the best move, truly? It’s a waste IMO. Waste of resources. Waste of troops. Waste of time. You focus on one player rather than the warring a tribe around you… leaves yourself open for enemies to strike (you seem to have called out Merge; maybe they do not like you either?) :icon_evil:“It's clear to me that #2 is not an option, even if it means hitting villages that are stacked. #1 is the only sensible solution. It sends a message to anybody else considering leaving that there are repercussions to defections. Dude's villages are at our core. Any potential expansion would require him to take our villages or DOA's villages--his intent when leaving.”
- While I enjoy the decently written PnP, seems like a rash post (similar to the tone of what seems to be transpiring between ~P~ and GloW) that ultimately will do nothing more than let your enemies know where your troops will be going. :icon_eek:“The other solution:
GLOW could:
1. stop their attempts to poach our players.
2. stop attempting to deceive our tribe members.
3. Remove Dude from their tribe.
4. Actually attempt reasonable diplomatic relations. Seeding a tribe is obviously preparation for war.
5. Turn their focus on the real threat: TribeWhoMustNotBeNamedBecauseICantEverGetItRight. Especially as they are wasting their nukes on the player we are currently using to seed them, and have lost quite a few defensive troops from PocketAces attacks. There has never been a better opportunity for GLOW to take on #1 in their area. You/they (as many of you reading this will be of that tribe), are easily the favorites to win this world. If we keep doing stupid shit like this--and you continue your attempts to undermine our tribes, we will flat out hand them the victory for the SE corner.
Interested in your thoughts,
Huskerst0rm”
Not sure who you're referring to, Merge? Again this is a thread about ~P~ and GloW. Not relevant and if you're insisting we war Merge now while we deal with ~P~ I am uncertain of your tactical knowledge.I read whole post. Glow makes a really dumb move for not going against hugger tribe.
Anonymous Player said:If I was more invested in this world I would be larger and might have asked for an invite in the future when my position was more favorable, but XXX takes most of my time. (EDITED TO PRESERVE IDENTITY.)
Long story short. ~P~ is to clustered and spread to thin with enemies on almost all fronts. They would be stupid to start attacks on Glow over one player. Plus it's not like there aren't others who will make the jump eventually.
– I was not aware; thank you for the enlightenment :icon_surprised:
- (1) Kind of touchy group. I’d say for leadership of a Top Ten tribe, that is a rash response to a mail… unless you are genuinely afraid folks will actually leave. And even with that, too emotional a response IMO. :icon_neutral:
- (2) Making a lot of assumptions… are you psychic? Looks like a member was unhappy, left. And your response looks like a break-up with your high school sweet-heart... strange. Stalk much? :icon_rolleyes:
- (3) If a player has played alongside someone for 8 weeks, do you expect them to turn their backs on a dime?... of course he wants more folks he has played with around him. Though by your words alone, looks like that is what you are doing to Dude(?) though. :icon_idea:
- (4) Do you feel this the best move, truly? It’s a waste IMO. Waste of resources. Waste of troops. Waste of time. You focus on one player rather than the warring a tribe around you… leaves yourself open for enemies to strike (you seem to have called out Merge; maybe they do not like you either?) :icon_evil:
- (5) While I enjoy the decently written PnP, seems like a rash post (similar to the tone of what seems to be transpiring between ~P~ and GloW) that ultimately will do nothing more than let your enemies know where your troops will be going. :icon_eek:
As requested, few thoughts laid out for you to read. Enjoy.