DeletedUser
Guest
congrats on your tribe finally starting to fight..it only took a month. 23 villages in a week and it took you 3 weeks before that to take like 5. well, at least you guys are actually fighting a war now
DTATDM is full of it, if they were inactive they wouldn't fight back, they wouldn't reply, they wouldn't let us sit their accounts and look at the forums because they're so sick of how DT runs things. REL is not loyal to DT, they are loyal to the points and to the idea of REL, if they were in tribes with leadership that cared for their members, then they would probably put up more of a fight. They're sick of a dictatorship, and I would be too (I'm one of the lucky ones with a couple of dukes and several barons, we have a diverse range of leadership positions and everyone has a say and is welcome to their own opinion). If REL is to remain a no.1 tribe, their leadership needs to change.
Note: the following will be biased. If you disagree with a view, then make your own post so that different views can be shown. Don't just say "No, you're wrong, btw I hate that metaphor, it's too cliche`" - show me how you'd like it to be seen rather than just say my view is wrong, believe it or not, that's how I see it.
congrats on your tribe finally starting to fight..it only took a month. 23 villages in a week and it took you 3 weeks before that to take like 5. well, at least you guys are actually fighting a war now
25 WaC? - it seems as if I can't find anything bad to say about them :icon_sad:.
I for one am totally loyal to DTATDM and all the barons.
And just to let you know since I guess you are oblivious to something call The Tribal Profile IF you were to look at REL's you would see the there are 3-5 barons. For only having one duke I think that is a good thing as otherwise half of the tribe would be loyal to 1 and half to the other. That would then create dissention within the tribe. With 1 duke you are either loyal or not loyal. And I for one think that if you are not loyal to REL and DTATDM then you can leave here and now.
Also for this talk about K47 players being inactive.
They have just started asking for support now.
It seems that many of the players near LHD and FEAR have some strong personal allies within these tribes and refuse to attack them in ops. I for one am not sure how loyal they are. Infact as i have seen many have left to join the enemy. And guess what?!? If I was DTATDM I would not let them back into REL when we get to their villages. If they reall wanted to be a part of the best tribe in REL then they should have stayed and risked being rimmed and just built up out there. However if they HAD stayed they would have gotten support. They really never gave the tribe a chance to respond and send support. Within an hour or so they left and I had to send out a circular mail that contradicted the one that I had sent out before saying not to support this player or that player because they were now in an ENEMY tribe!!
I'd recheck the stats page.
Sorry, I didn't check the stats before this, it took 4 hrs as it was (on and off, doing tw stuff, eating, etc.).
But if you won't make a correction to it yourself (either by posting an edited version or an entirely new one), then I'll leave it as it is.
By the way, if you've got any more loose cannons (not naming names here or pointing fingers, just saying there is one that's gotten a portion of [DT] quite infuriated), point them in the direction of North instead of your allies if you expect to win this war .
congrats on your tribe finally starting to fight..it only took a month. 23 villages in a week and it took you 3 weeks before that to take like 5. well, at least you guys are actually fighting a war now
#1 2007,December 13th, 05:35 Top
Side 1: North
Side 2: Suigen
Timeframe: Forever
Side 1: Total conquers: 387
Side 2: Total conquers: 2954
Difference: Total conquers: 2567
Side 1: Total conquers against other side: 31
Side 2: Total conquers against other side: 15
Difference: Total conquers against other side: 16
Side 1: Total conquers points value: 1,685,092
Side 2: Total conquers points value: 12,527,718
Difference: Total conquers points value: 10,842,626
Side 1: Total conquers against other side points value: 192,482
Side 2: Total conquers against other side points value: 105,392
Difference: Total conquers against other side points value: 87,090
Withering I think you did as great of a job as any single one player could have in evaluating each tribe. Of course it will be biased and some things incorrect, there's no way for any single players to know everything about there is to know about the top 30 tribes. It was an interesting read and nice to see another persons perspective upon those tribes.
I personally don't think FEAR's no official diplomacy will hurt them, they are a very good tribe and will go far with their present leadership and style of play. Anyways, they are willing to create unofficial alliances and NAP's and are able to recognize when and with who they should. Arts works more closely with them than with any tribe we have official diplomacy with and more than most any tribe does with their official alliances.
I won't say much as oblomovo has already commented upon it, but we are in no way even a semi-elite tribe and it is unlikely we ever will be. Maybe I will get around to writing a short evaluation of us, but I am very lazy and it is also pretty unlikely.
P.S. DTA you said you'd respond to my answers of your questions, but you never did. It's not a big deal though feel free to just talk to warlord if you'd prefer, I believe the two of us have the same or similar opinions on those matters.
Even if I did swing that way, I wouldn't go there... I saw that pic.
I suppose i shall make my post in this thread.
In Response to DTA: having one duke all the time is in general not always better for a tribe as having only one leader means basically what you say is law and plus theres always the possibility of well what if you lose your account/leave the game etc, if theres no other duke then everyones stuck being a baron which can make things difficult for tribes.
Secondly: I cba to write up my own examination and besides i'm entirely too biased to write it tbh.
I suppose i shall make my post in this thread.
In Response to DTA: having one duke all the time is in general not always better for a tribe as having only one leader means basically what you say is law and plus theres always the possibility of well what if you lose your account/leave the game etc, if theres no other duke then everyones stuck being a baron which can make things difficult for tribes.
Secondly: I cba to write up my own examination and besides i'm entirely too biased to write it tbh.