DeletedUser
Guest
Okay Eyes, I've tried to talk to you about this "NAP" a couple times in TWmail, but now I have to make it public. I've had about enough of this talk of a NAP with D*D, and it's time to get the facts straight.
I have been the leader of D*D since February of this year. Previous to that Steve34cks was the leader for 5 months, and then I was the leader for 9 months before that. Previous to that, GoldenSummit was the leader for at least 18 months. That takes us back three years, and not much after D*D entered the war against Cult. Being that you are in Cult, and before that D*D and Cult were marked as allies, this is significant. For why would there be an NAP in place previous to this time for you to meet your goal?
The first time you messaged me about this NAP with D*D was during my first time at the helm of D*D. You mentioned you had an NAP with D*D and you were being attacked. I told you I wasn't aware of any agreement, and being that I was in the leadership since the first day I was in D*D, I found this very strange that I never heard of such an agreement. I told you I'd check with other leaders, including Golden Summit, if there was such an agreement. Not one leader said they had agreed to an NAP with you on behalf of the tribe, including Golden Summit. And in D*D, if the Arch-Duke doesn't know about it, then there is no agreement. I told you this at this time, and asked which leader made this agreement. You gave me no answer, you could only say "leaders".
There is no NAP with you and D*D, and there never was, and as long as I'm the leader and you are in an enemy tribe, there will never be. It's not because I don't like you, or any other reason...I just don't make agreements like that. I play the game this way: You are in an enemy tribe, you are an enemy. I have never had a personal NAP...that's what tribes and allied agreements are for.
Now, if there was an agreement in place, or you thought there was, why did you not quit as you stated you would? Perhaps you changed your mind? That's cool, I have no problems with players staying in the game. We're just playing this game the way it should be played...attack red dots.
Now, I figure you'll tell everyone that you've emailed me a few times and asked about taking villages. I told you I didn't care, if my guys weren't taking them, then you could. Frankly, I find it odd you'd mail me, and I try not to ignore most people who email me, but what did you want me to say? Basically, I humored you and your mails.
Now, I'll say this publicly...if you want an NAP with D*D, I'll give it to you. All you have to do is form your own tribe, agree to pull out all your troops from Cult and OT villages, and never support a single Cult or OT player. Then you can have your villages in each of the 100 continents, and we'll leave you alone.
Stay in OT, be treated as an enemy.
I have been the leader of D*D since February of this year. Previous to that Steve34cks was the leader for 5 months, and then I was the leader for 9 months before that. Previous to that, GoldenSummit was the leader for at least 18 months. That takes us back three years, and not much after D*D entered the war against Cult. Being that you are in Cult, and before that D*D and Cult were marked as allies, this is significant. For why would there be an NAP in place previous to this time for you to meet your goal?
The first time you messaged me about this NAP with D*D was during my first time at the helm of D*D. You mentioned you had an NAP with D*D and you were being attacked. I told you I wasn't aware of any agreement, and being that I was in the leadership since the first day I was in D*D, I found this very strange that I never heard of such an agreement. I told you I'd check with other leaders, including Golden Summit, if there was such an agreement. Not one leader said they had agreed to an NAP with you on behalf of the tribe, including Golden Summit. And in D*D, if the Arch-Duke doesn't know about it, then there is no agreement. I told you this at this time, and asked which leader made this agreement. You gave me no answer, you could only say "leaders".
There is no NAP with you and D*D, and there never was, and as long as I'm the leader and you are in an enemy tribe, there will never be. It's not because I don't like you, or any other reason...I just don't make agreements like that. I play the game this way: You are in an enemy tribe, you are an enemy. I have never had a personal NAP...that's what tribes and allied agreements are for.
Now, if there was an agreement in place, or you thought there was, why did you not quit as you stated you would? Perhaps you changed your mind? That's cool, I have no problems with players staying in the game. We're just playing this game the way it should be played...attack red dots.
Now, I figure you'll tell everyone that you've emailed me a few times and asked about taking villages. I told you I didn't care, if my guys weren't taking them, then you could. Frankly, I find it odd you'd mail me, and I try not to ignore most people who email me, but what did you want me to say? Basically, I humored you and your mails.
Now, I'll say this publicly...if you want an NAP with D*D, I'll give it to you. All you have to do is form your own tribe, agree to pull out all your troops from Cult and OT villages, and never support a single Cult or OT player. Then you can have your villages in each of the 100 continents, and we'll leave you alone.
Stay in OT, be treated as an enemy.
