END WORLD

blckdrgn1

Guest
nightwolf13 said:
The thing I find interesting as an outsider (and would be curious to hear if there is an obvious reason that I just don't know because I'm not playing this world), DST/ARCHER/SCORP/CROWS are SIGNIFICANTLY larger than Wizard. Overall the stats are definitely in that coalitions favor, the past couple weeks they lean towards Wizard and the last few days they lean towards the coalition again. The thing that I find curious is why are the stats as close as they are with such a disparity between the two groups? It seems to me that the coalition should be beating Wizard pretty handily given the significant higher amount of troops available and number of members to be active.
Click to expand...

Getting 160 accounts rowing their boats in the same direction is a little trickier than getting 45 to do it.
 

DeletedUser80268

Guest
blckdrgn1 said:
Getting 160 accounts rowing their boats in the same direction is a little trickier than getting 45 to do it.
Click to expand...
That's fair, but if you do things in squads or in location based groups it is very easy to be on the same page. It seems from reading posts that Stephenmac has a group in the east. Pavle (not sure who that is) has a group in the west and then Dins (I'm guessing it's the D3thiron person) has a group in the middle? (again oustider so I apologize if I am very far off). I don't know, still just seems a little off. I feel the numbers should be very strongly in favor of the coalition
 

DeletedUser120715

Guest
khaotic Caucasion said:
We have the luxury of losing big accounts because we have so many other accounts that we can internal and still have more activity than your tribe. You lose 2 accounts, that's a big chunk of activity. Say we keep this trend up, we lose 2 and you lose 2 every week? We will be the last ones standing because we have so many more active members. You're runfning out of backend players to quit, the big dogs will start dropping soon.
Click to expand...

Inactives quit. Its not that we are losing 2 and you 2 every week...When our back line inactives quit, the tribe will be fully functional and we will work united as one. You are 160 players, we'll see how many of them will still be here after one month right?
 
ampac

ampac

Contributing Poster
Reaction score
112
Thats fair enough, Im sure u and me are still here...And Blkdragon...

Mayhem, you dont think that you could still win this do you? after all the shit that your tribe have done to the loyal Wizard warriors who joined us...funny thing is that they told us that your tribe is full of shit and you guys are so greedy ingame...(Lol* this is the purpose of Externals right propaganda?) Lol*


Hahahahahha!!!

Oh well up to you to prove them their wrong.. :)

But from the looks of it your proving that they are right :)
 

DeletedUser120715

Guest
Win this? Hahahahahaah, i am sure i will win this. You have less than 10 accounts playing in this world at a competitive level. and i can count them one by one, and you have lost all the momentum you had by recruiting your spies at all fronts. Until now, every player of yours who got opped by us (except d3) had a big mouth but lost a ton of villages without even trying to play proper defense. Your point whores are going down and i dont see that you can do something about it.
Also, you personally cant have a solid opinion about this war and the frontlines without being in any front line at all. Your game is easy, throwing nukes at ops and sending defenses at the fronts but ask your tribe mates for how long will they be capable of spending so many hours in front of a pc?

You told about wizards that we have few players left, but most of these players have frontline villages while you have 5-6 players holding your fronts. Are you sure this tactic gonna work for long?
 

DeletedUser120206

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: WIZARD
Side 2:
Tribes: ARCHER, DST

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 383
Side 2: 494
Difference: 111

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 50
Side 2: 49
Difference: 1

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 2,516,624
Side 2: 3,642,110
Difference: 1,125,486

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 344,308
Side 2: 416,630
Difference: 72,322

chart


---------------------------

ARCHER and DST Total Conquers: 494 - 102 + 76 = 316
Wizard Total Conquers: 383 - 145 = 238
Corrected Difference: 316 - 238 = 78
Archer and DST Barb Conquers: 125 (39.30% of Total Conquers)
Wizard Barb Conquers: 73 (30.67% of Total Conquers)

---------------------------

Looks like ARCHER and DST have been the biggest Barb Noblers in what has been a stalemate week for all involved.

~Patrick
 

DeletedUser119947

Guest
wizard = pro
dst/archer = noobs

noble more barbs. so you last longer :)
 

DeletedUser103748

Guest
Ronald Weasley said:
wizard = pro
dst/archer = noobs

noble more barbs. so you last longer :)
Click to expand...

-Losing war by 700+ caps
-Falling behind in size (lower growth than opponents every week)
-Smaller member base (loss of activity is more painful on an account-by-account basis)
-Growing dissent among membership

Guess you gotta try to win in the forums then: "LUL BARB MUNCHERS"
 

blckdrgn1

Guest
Deja vu! Every world I've won, the enemy sounded just like mr mayhem.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Vahtos said:
-Losing war by 700+ caps
-Falling behind in size (lower growth than opponents every week)
-Smaller member base (loss of activity is more painful on an account-by-account basis)
-Growing dissent among membership

Guess you gotta try to win in the forums then: "LUL BARB MUNCHERS"
Click to expand...
How many caps behind is Wizard if you include @Night and LAD war stats? Really not sure and am curious if anyone wants to post it in here.
 

DeletedUser119947

Guest
probably he is from crows... dst/archer bi**h nobling barbarians and making def troops, posting on forum acting like a pro.. HAHAHA :)
 
Lady Mihaela Targaryen

Lady Mihaela Targaryen

Non-stop Poster
Reaction score
55
Really,Covfefe?

It's not Covfefe to Covfefe about Covfefe Covfefe
Is also speaks Covfefe about Covfefe,regarding Covfefe and the Covfefe
And I Covfefe about Covfefe really Covfefe is?
But let's not Covfefe about Covfefe too Covfefe.in the Covfefe all that Covfefe is Covfefe

And let me summed it up with one word :

COVFEFE
 

DeletedUser120206

Guest
kronos2367 said:
Really,Covfefe?

It's not Covfefe to Covfefe about Covfefe Covfefe
Is also speaks Covfefe about Covfefe,regarding Covfefe and the Covfefe
And I Covfefe about Covfefe really Covfefe is?
But let's not Covfefe about Covfefe too Covfefe.in the Covfefe all that Covfefe is Covfefe

And let me summed it up with one word :

COVFEFE
Click to expand...

Whatcha smoking homie? You must be lost or not aware of what you may be posting because it makes no sense just like your previous accounts fate being rimmed/should have been rimmed, someone escort Kronos back to the bus where it will take them to some institution where they can learn how to speak common sense.

~Patrick
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top