I hope you plan on declaring walsh, because SubV don't have the balls to do it themselves.
uhhh, i dont why you're insulting us...can your tribe take on a 3-players tribe? i mean that's a pretty bad move. "hoping" an enemy to declare war on your allies and insulting your allies arent the best ways to keep the allianceship. Instead, it might make us turn our guns on you guys, just basic psychology.
and i think i know why you want EB-GBs to declare war on SubV: so that your tribe (Mighty) doesnt have to face EB-GBs. it's just too obvious. trying to turn 2 top tribes against each other while you're losing a war against one of them isnt the best strategy yet.
also, i suggest you check your tribe's location again. Mighty is located BETWEEN SubV and EB-GBs. Therefore, if EB-GBs were to declare war on us in SubV, they'll take MIGHTY out first, wouldnt you agree? (another solution is to merge...which is a very bad idea, look at PIRANA, instead of fighting, they hugged and being hated by most of the top tribes. So if Mighty and EB-GBs merged, it'll just become the "2nd PIRANA" family).
So a player attacks an ally(No clue about SUBV's diplomacy. Just a shot in the wind.) And he only gets dissmissed? Sounds like a pretty lenient rule to me.
they have been with us for many OPs, killing together, having fun together, helping each other out in tight spots. Thus, it is not morally right to destroy them. They havent done anything to US IN SubV (they would have been gone by now if they attacked a SubV member).
Plus, we're THE noobs, what do you expect us to do? All we do is point-whoring, so why bother taking on 3 powerful players and lose a lot of troops when we can just relax and go Fishing (that was sarcasm in case someone misunderstood, trust me, some people does take this serious)