I see people complaining that we are giving feedback so instead of canceling our feedback please contribute and give yours. we have every right to say what we feels and if your only reason to post is to say our feedback is wrong in a feedback thread then you have an issue.
The problem is that the feedback was quite frankly shit.
Jawjaw was clearly looking for meaningful feedback about how this setting would affect gameplay. Instead all he got was mostly
tHiS sEtTiNg Is WeiRd!!
Or
"This setting doenst follow the narrative of what i think classic should consist of"
What should have been posted if people didnt want this crappy setting was something like this:
I dont agree with this setting because when it is in conjunction with expensive nobles and no hauls it greatly restricts defensive gameplay options. Recapping becomes a very cost-ineffective strategy and therefore your main option will be to just simply stack each nuke/noble that comes in. Any setting that reduces your options either in terms of attacking or defending should be considered flawed as it artificially lowers the difficulty ceiling. This world will primarily come down to who can be the most cost efficient with their nobling which will be mostly down to having the best spreadsheet/AM template to build the barbs you take. Additionally these type of settings create a risk-adverse environment which will encourage gentle merges and internalling. Therefore i feel like these settings are contrary to the concept of classic worlds being a 'hard mode' TW game setting. The world will likely be relatively passive and tame.
The reason i didnt post it is because i think classic is a wankfest anyway so i had no intention of playing regardless. But i bet if people had posted stuff like this JawJaw would have been more likely to take it into consideration.
The whole debate is part of a wider issue of a disconnect between what the tw community considers the essence of 'classic' and what Innogames themselves consider to be 'classic'
Perhaps that wonderful think tank sub forum could be used to discuss this critical and riveting issue