Ideas for making this world more exciting

Michael Wittman

Guest
say i have 1 million points. my enemy has 4 million points. i do not think it would be remiss for me to noble some barbs and inactives with the intent of building more offense and defense in order to counter his numerical advantage. but then again, that is so obvious that only a NOOB would say that we should only take active players when our enemies are 4 times our size because they started the world in the core or were more active in the beginning. yes it is easy to say only a noob nobles barbarians and inacitves. stupid people can make this claim to sound important. however if you look at strategy and troop production, each village is a troop factory and if you take them with the full intent of producing more troops for the war effort because you are badly outnumbered, you would not be a noob. it would be the idiot wanting to sound self important claiming that the only possible way to play well is to play by their narrow view of fighting. it is a long world with much strategy and all villages are troop factories. stop sounding like an idiot telling people who fight much bigger enemies to attack only active players. that would be completely counter productive in the long run as it would slow your growth while the large players keep growing. idiots. so tired of it
 

Swendog

Guest
Yup, what wittman said. I don't think many listen to the noobs that presume how the game should be played.
 

DeletedUser92095

Guest
Michael Wittman said:
say i have 1 million points. my enemy has 4 million points. i do not think it would be remiss for me to noble some barbs and inactives with the intent of building more offense and defense in order to counter his numerical advantage. but then again, that is so obvious that only a NOOB would say that we should only take active players when our enemies are 4 times our size because they started the world in the core or were more active in the beginning. yes it is easy to say only a noob nobles barbarians and inacitves. stupid people can make this claim to sound important. however if you look at strategy and troop production, each village is a troop factory and if you take them with the full intent of producing more troops for the war effort because you are badly outnumbered, you would not be a noob. it would be the idiot wanting to sound self important claiming that the only possible way to play well is to play by their narrow view of fighting. it is a long world with much strategy and all villages are troop factories. stop sounding like an idiot telling people who fight much bigger enemies to attack only active players. that would be completely counter productive in the long run as it would slow your growth while the large players keep growing. idiots. so tired of it
Click to expand...

LOL. funny how you always miss the point. who ever said the only way to play well was to play the way we do? point is you put your money where your mouth is. you talk trash, you back it up. FYI, eating 3k barbs isn't "backing it up" especially when you're trying to call out a top ranked tribe.

Oh and just so we're clear, the idea of not taking barbs was in response to the topic. If you think nobling grey dots makes this world more exciting then i can't help but feel sad for you and your tribe.

@swen
you agree with wittman? seriously? LOL
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Swendog

Guest
My whole point is that who cares about barbs. If someone uses their precious nobles on a barb than so be it. For someone to tell me not to take the 10K barbs in my clusters if players that went inactive when I'm not even on the front lines is completely irrational. Those villages generate troops, generate coins and add to the overall coziness of my villagers. Back off peeps and stop by for some ale when in the neighborhood.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
carrot soup said:
LOL. funny how you always miss the point. who ever said the only way to play well was to play the way we do? point is you put your money where your mouth is. you talk trash, you back it up. FYI, eating 3k barbs isn't "backing it up" especially when you're trying to call out a top ranked tribe.

Each and every individual player has there own style of play for example i for one absolutely hate Nobling barbs i would much prefer an active player's village because it gives me the sense of domination and it also is more of a challenge but even on my conquer record there are a few barb conquers here and there for strategical reasons.

the way you should be looking at it is if you guys think you are going to win the war then why not allow them to noble barbs surely if you are to win they are only building you up nice clusters no?

Oh and just so we're clear, the idea of not taking barbs was in response to the topic. If you think nobling grey dots makes this world more exciting then i can't help but feel sad for you and your tribe.

I agree with this +1

@swen
you agree with wittman? seriously? LOL
Click to expand...

Responded above^
 

DeletedUser92095

Guest
Like I said, this has nothing to do with wanting people to play a specific style. Just make them put their money where their mouth is. Nothing more. When people keep bragging about bringing FOOLS down, one thing I would expect from them is to actually noble villages from us.

Funny how people who used tor refer themselves as "warriors" would rather talk strategy now when they were promising to bring the downfall of FOOLS immediately after the secrets phase was won.
 

Swendog

Guest
carrot soup said:
Like I said, this has nothing to do with wanting people to play a specific style. Just make them put their money where their mouth is. Nothing more. When people keep bragging about bringing FOOLS down, one thing I would expect from them is to actually noble villages from us.

Funny how people who used tor refer themselves as "warriors" would rather talk strategy now when they were promising to bring the downfall of FOOLS immediately after the secrets phase was won.
Click to expand...

who was promising to bring down fools after the secret? no such thing was said by SOLO.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
carrot soup said:
when they were promising to bring the downfall of FOOLS immediately after the secrets phase was won.
Click to expand...
I wasn't on this world to play the secret win and after all the info I have gotten from it i am glad I wasn't here at all, it is just not my thing :icon_eek: whomever said that they will bring the downfall on FOOLS as of imminently after the secret win is talking rubbish it can not be don, its impossible and even unrealistic especially now, and if it came from solo i surely will not side on such a claim :icon_twisted:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser92095

Guest
Swendog said:
who was promising to bring down fools after the secret? no such thing was said by SOLO.
Click to expand...

Nobody said anything about that coming from SOLO. You guys were on our side back then weren't you? :) I believe it was wittman and our other loyal detractors who said things to that effect. Anyways, we all agree its rubbish so that's that.
 

DeletedUser99939

Guest
UnicornsAreReal said:
I wasn't on this world to play the secret win and after all the info I have gotten from it i am glad I wasn't here at all, it is just not my thing :icon_eek: whomever said that they will bring the downfall on FOOLS as of imminently after the secret win is talking rubbish it can not be don, its impossible and even unrealistic especially now, and if it came from solo i surely will not side on such a claim :icon_twisted:
Click to expand...
you wouldn't have wanted to have been here. Was crap.
 

Swendog

Guest
Yes Fools is a very strong tribe. Not an easy task to "bring" it down so to speak. Poor leadership from folks like Ezekial and Bang might though.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
WaTz PopPiN? said:
I'm surprised you were able to give yourself enough time away from your pajama party watching "My little pony" with your BF's to post this..
Click to expand...

I am not the surprised something not that funny or creative came from you.
 

DeletedUser100095

Guest
this thread was started with the title "Ideas for making this world more exciting" one poster put forth a couple of good ideas.....1.lowering cost of coins and 2.blocking barbs from being nobled. I would totally support both of the actions as a way to make the game more exciting.

I am not trying to tell anyone how to play thier game. Just tell me how exciting it is to take villages that cannot/willnot fight back?

As for taking those big barbs let me ask-
Did you lose troops clearing those barbs?
Could you have used those troops to clear an enemy/potential threat?

You say you need those villages to build troop factories- do newly aquired enemy villages not produce troops?

If you take an enemy village you have done 2 things
1. removed a threat/pontetial threat
2. aquired a village to produce those troops you say you need
 

WaTz PopPiN?

Guest
Blocking barbs from being nobled would be a tuff feat to get them to do, but half price coins makes perfect sense.
 

Swendog

Guest
tumblr_mkuj1kV6qm1rmiim9o1_500.jpg
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I saw that one on the Lad Bible earlier, made me laugh. :icon_biggrin:

Although it seems it is already too late. :icon_sad:

155743_505761566137705_1219269833_n.jpg


On Topic: Half Price coins would be nice, last I checked it was 1200ish players left with a good few of those over the 1000 mark being 0 points or restarted and most likely inactive so hopefully it won't be a long time until we actually meet the requirements for half priced coins.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top