So anything that is negative to Manic is people being biased?thats not being honest, its being biased.
Maybe it is because you post like this? Extremely biased and hypocritical..Warstiner has always been flamed so has MANIC.
On past worlds whenever me or jon (warstiner) would post something on the public 20 trolls came running from under their bridges and flamed it... regardless what it was.
In what way were they disgusted? By the amounting of hugging that tribes have done on this world. If so, they are no different in that regard.MANIC decisions and way of leading was disgusted by other leaders from other tribes.
But in the end, manic was still there and on top.
There isn't that much difference in Fork and Manic. The Rank 1 and 2 tribe changes all the time on this world, as the tribes kick and recruit quite frequently.MANIC is rank 1 now with a 200 village lead, warstiner is rank 1 as player, hes leading an extremely active tribe with to much testosterone sometimes, but he handles it.
I don't think 1 or 2. The tribes haven't proven themselves to be good or bad. I am impartial in this regards. WOW I am Fork and not biased... shame Manic can't do the same on the whole.Btw, Fork members, you are extremely biased, all yoru comments are based on 2 things: 1 fork is awesome, 2 MANIC sucks...
Try to be more original and use an outsider view....
Nevertheless FORK is also an extremely good tribe if u just look at raw stats, both tribes are double the size of the rank 3 wich is an extremely incredible achievement in my eyes.
Not every post from a Fork member thinking Fork is a good tribe is biased, it is probably their honest opinion. Why would you be in a tribe you thought sucked? and then say how bad it is on forums? That would just be stupid..