Most impressive player(s) so far?

DeletedUser105025

Guest
Its good. I couldn't believe you would give credit to players defensive skills based on stacking.
 

DeletedUser113394

Guest
its not meant to be funny,it appears you think everything is meant to be funny though.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Honourable mention to KPland.

He's done a great job defending against our last OP. Not sure if the owner of the account is still playing though. It might have been a sitter doing the hard work...
 

DeletedUser113394

Guest
yes,although the tribe did help...But its played by a very good player.
 

DeletedUser105025

Guest
Why doesn't war peace do something from his own account ? or...
 

DeletedUser108663

Guest
Why on earth would he do that when he can internal instead?
 

DeletedUser113394

Guest
well they can do Both at the same time so thats a bonus, Their Oda speaks for itself.They do have more than 100 caps vs Zips and no more than 10 losses so they Can ACTUALLY do something from their acc as well as sits :)
 

DeletedUser108663

Guest
and of those 100 caps, atleast half were villages we practically gave away (ie deep k65 vils - Carpet and Xapiex) and the last vill he took from ZIPs was back in September, all he's done since is internal..
 

Serious George

Non-stop Poster
Reaction score
203
I love it how so many are so quick to criticize players based on internals or barb nobling or "easy" captures versus "difficult ones." Nobling stats do not speak directly to the skill of a player. There are many variables involved in why players have the stats that they do. Stats don't tell the story of how much someone is supporting other players, how busy the player is with different sits, or handling tribal matters. Accounts also have co-players who are all at different skill levels as well. At the end of the day, you never truly know how skilled a player is until you have battled against them over an extended period of time. You then can see how they play and adapt in order to win the battle and/or war.
 

DeletedUser105025

Guest
Half of what you just said doesn't make any difference.
 

Serious George

Non-stop Poster
Reaction score
203
Half of what you just said doesn't make any difference.

It does make a difference regardless of what you think. There are a lot of factors that come into the equation of the how any particular account is played and how much of an impact that account has.
 

DeletedUser105025

Guest
What you said was a mumble jumble of what you think, not what is fact, or anything to do with what i think either.

Being a good player simply comes down to how you play, not how you can talk/act/mumble.
 

Serious George

Non-stop Poster
Reaction score
203
What you said was a mumble jumble of what you think, not what is fact, or anything to do with what i think either.

Being a good player simply comes down to how you play, not how you can talk/act/mumble.

Let me spell it out for you in simpler terms so that perhaps you can understand:

1. A players nobling history / stats (ODA/ODD) does not necessarily tell how skilled a player is

2. How much time a player is able to spend on their own account directly impacts what they are able to do. For example, if a player only spends an hour a day on their account then their stats and what they are able to do will be greatly impacted. Activity is nice but it doesn't make someone "skilled."

3. Fighting a player over an extended period of time is the only true test of their skill.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
1. A players nobling history / stats (ODA/ODD) does not necessarily tell how skilled a player is
They give a pretty good idea of if the player is any decent. They may not be directly related but there's a pretty noticeable correlation between what one nobles and how skilled he or she is. Most players nobling only barbs are people that either can't take villages from enemies or are too unsure of their ability to even try.

3. Fighting a player over an extended period of time is the only true test of their skill.

Very rarely does anyone ever fight someone 1v1, this is why there are stats by which people measure skill. Someone being "skilled" compared to you as compared to another is relative; stats are objective.
 
Top