You brought it up. Why?
Oh and congratulations for having the willpower to resist commenting twice. Unfortunately it failed on the third occasion. Were my words too much to resist
Now I can clear up your confusion over who you invited, when, and who had told you it would be a diplomatic violation:
[spoil]b4ldr on 10.08. at 20:53
You have also invited Vase, which i believe breaks the terms you have set out.
fireyflame on 11.08. at 00:20
"You have also invited Vase, which i believe breaks the terms you have set out."
i hadn't invited vase but even if i had how does that break the terms of agreement?[/spoil]
However.. when I talked to AngryChef, he had a bit different story to tell:
[spoil]AngryChef on 13.08. at 14:19
I have read this mail, it is not really a recruitment mail, vase face was invited on the 6th August 2010 and as soon as vase face moved the members over to us, he then joined, I am not going to send you the mail tho as it also contains some sensitive matters regards to our tribe, and I do not want to cat bit's out and be accused of hiding anything from you..[/spoil]
Oops, lie much fiery?
It's clear to everyone involved that he is indeed a refugee, even Vase:
[spoil]Vasetheface on 12.08. at 06:30
I know, I cannot expect attacks to stop. I have received no support from the tribe, nor have I asked for any.
AngryChef on 12.08. at 08:35
I am talking to vase face, and he is confirming what you say about the attacks, and even says him self that he is classed as a refugee..[/spoil]
Now we have threats of war over one little refugee who is being eaten by multiple tribes. You wanted to know why I said there was no point in mailing ABCD about refugees.. here it is, special delivery for the peanut gallery.